- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WAPO reporting Nathan Phillips did not fight in vietnam war, which was claimed prior
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:31 pm to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:31 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
o people were claiming him as a Vietnam veteran bc he was in the Marines in '72 is what I'm gathering. I'm just waiting to see any links of him claiming he was a war vet or stolen valor. Was he in fact in the Marines in 72? That's what I'm seeing but no confirmation.
I then asked for links to confirm and got them. Then gave my response and said Phillips is wrong to not correct the record.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:32 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
confirmed this lack of existence.
Government coverup. Like they would really tell you if they existed
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:32 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
said Phillips is wrong to not correct the record.
He should also correct it to show that he was the aggressor
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:33 pm to roadGator
quote:
Your continued defense of the liar is also wrong.
Just admit that you are on the wrong side of history on this. You progs love that saying. Lol
I'm now entirely convinced you're not even reading my post before replying with an incoherent and completely out of this world drivel. Would you like to join the conversation or do you just want to continue to melt over there?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:35 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Odd water head you didn't work in a bone spurs.
Would you like to join the conversation or do you just want to continue to melt over there?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:36 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:He said he was a Vietnam vet not a Vietnam era vet.
he is in fact a Vietnam era vet
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:37 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
WAPO reporting Nathan Phillips did not fight in vietnam war, which was claimed prior

Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:38 pm to ShreveportHog94
Can't take losing. Most progs can't.
This whole thing was a lie and you jumped in with both feet.
Just say I was wrong and move to your next talking point opportunity that shareblue puts out there for you guys.
This whole thing was a lie and you jumped in with both feet.
Just say I was wrong and move to your next talking point opportunity that shareblue puts out there for you guys.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:38 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:I didn't ask you a question, goofball.
Asked and answered.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:38 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
And since you’ll be too lazy or ignorant to look it up, a gracious TD poster did the work for you here...
First I'm probably one of the first posters to question his status: LINK
As other posters in that same thread (Lsupimp/Abuthemonkey) enlightened me as to the "Vietnam Era Vet" distinction, I did look around and couldn't find anywhere where he used the term "Vietnam Vet" and clearly stated I can't possibly see everything and was open to evidence that he may have.
Finally, I watched the video in the post you linked to. He says "Vietnam Veteran Times", that he served 72-76 and was out a year after Vietnam ended. So again, unless I missed it in the clip, I still don't see Phillips, who has serious character issues otherwise, claiming war vet status.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:38 pm to ShreveportHog94
Here's your problem. You should have just condemned the man for his lies, but then you throw in a defensive line on his behalf, and also a deflection with your Trump quip.
Be a man and just stay on topic son. You're a hack.
Be a man and just stay on topic son. You're a hack.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:40 pm to LSURussian
Not surprised that went over your head.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:41 pm to ShreveportHog94
I’ve asked this question before and I will ask it again. Why are all the Arkansas fans on this board huge bleeding cuckish pussies?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:42 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Here's your problem. You should have just condemned the man for his lies, but then you throw in a defensive line on his behalf, and also a deflection with your Trump quip.
I asked for the proof then gave my response. I understand that seeking truth isn't a priority of this board and it's all about your side vs their side. It's ok. Give it a few years and maybe you'll grow out if it.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:42 pm to ShreveportHog94
It didn't go over my head. You're protesting too much. Grow up.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:45 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:As best I could understand over the background noise, he said “As a Vietnam veteran times ... served in the Marine Corps 1972 to 1976, got out in May ... the year after the war ended....”
And since you’ll be too lazy or ignorant to look it up, a gracious TD poster did the work for you here...
Sounds like an old man who switched the order of two words in a sentence, trying to say “Vietnam times veteran.”
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:46 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
ETA: Looks like CNN misquoted him looking at the actual video.
Yes, he used the Vietnam Times Veteran moniker again.
Look, maybe someone can unearth him saying otherwise, but I still think the story is a shitty media being lazy or intentionally trying to gin up the outrage.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:46 pm to ShreveportHog94
It's funny how you claim people miss the point and mine went way over your head. It's okay, maybe you will stop being a child one day, give it a few years..
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:47 pm to NIH
quote:no, there is not. See post above.
There's a link on page two that leads to video of him saying he was a Vietnam Veteran.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 3:03 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







