- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Virginia bill would legalize abortion up to and including labor
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is the type of shite we want leading our country?
Looking at you dumb frick libs.
Looking at you dumb frick libs.
0
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:16 pm to keks tadpole
quote:
As soon as RGB kicks-offs RVW is going to get attacked from all angles.
But why would lib/progs risk it?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:21 pm to Powerman
What percentage of Democrats do you think would disapprove of this law?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:26 pm to Wednesday
quote:
I ordinarily don’t get myself too worked up about the abortion issue. But wow. That is GUT WRENCHING. I felt sick. That legislator is childbearing age.
Same here, I normally don't get involved in the abortion discussions because it doesn't mean a lot to me personally, even though I am a conservative.
But this one - and the ones starting to appear like it - are a disturbing trend. Who is this bill FOR? Who is waiting until the last trimester, or right until birth, to decide on an abortion? This bill does nothing to better any situation and only serves as a poke in the eye to pro-lifers and those on the opposing side.
In short, it's a "look at me being totally down with the leftist cause" bill. There is nothing to gain here.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:27 pm to Ten Bears
quote:
I just sincerely want to know what is the purpose of stretching the law this far and legalizing infanticide?
Progressives want the state to be at the center of every decision its citizens make in their lives. How does one accomplish this? I believe the key is desensitizing people to the institutions that are threats to the state. This begins by devaluing human life, particularly those of the unborn. Once that happens, you lay a framework for justifying all manner of assisted homicide. The baby is deformed, it can be aborted. The child has a poor life quality, it can be aborted. The old folks are in pain and can't be cared for, they can be aborted. And who do you think will eventually make those decisions? The state. Having the power of deciding life and death is the ultimate power. That's what this is about imo.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I am sure this is just as benign as the NY law. No biggie.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:29 pm to udtiger
They are going to frick around and get RVW brought back and overturned.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:32 pm to Janky
quote:
They are going to frick around and get RVW brought back and overturned.
which would return it to a state's right issue, not a complete nationwide ban as the pro-babykiller crowd would have you believe.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:37 pm to Ten Bears
quote:I suspect that 95% of people who support abortion rights would personally oppose this sort of procedure. So, why the statute? I suspect that it arises from a fear of the slippery slope.
Can some libtard please explain the purpose of this?
And don’t give me the “life of the mother might be in jeopardy” crap. No one would be arrested or prosecuted for that even if there was some archaic law on on the books.
I just sincerely want to know what is the purpose of stretching the law this far and legalizing infanticide?
“If we agree to any limits on abortion, the Bible Thumpers will eventually take away all abortion rights and maybe even contraception.”
Most supporters of abortion rights are not quite that paranoid.
This post was edited on 1/29/19 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
A country that goes along with this isn’t worth saving.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I’m pro choice but this is a bit ridiculous. There has to be a limit.
At this rate it won’t be long before the left says it should be legal to terminate an infant several months AFTER delivery.
I also think it is interesting that she says the bill will remove informed consent requirements.
How does the left justify that???
At this rate it won’t be long before the left says it should be legal to terminate an infant several months AFTER delivery.
I also think it is interesting that she says the bill will remove informed consent requirements.
How does the left justify that???
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:56 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Kathy, say hello to Hitler for me when you reach your final destination.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 7:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Most supporters of abortion rights are not quite that paranoid.
Honestly. If supporters of abortion “rights” would be willing to recognize that there are some acceptable limits on the procedure the abortion opponents wouldn’t be so paranoid.
I just cannot see any rational reason to permit this barbaric practice. I cannot see any reason an abortion at 8 MOs pregnant would be any less dangerous to a pregnant woman than an emergency ceserean. The only reason to permit this practice is that there is some fricked up portion of the population that thinks it’s ok to kill a baby.
I don’t think that’s paranoid of me. I think that’s sane.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Please, please, please pass this POS Virginia. Please, please!
up to and including labor
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
It seems every single day the left moves the line of sickness and depravity a little further.
It's already crossed beyond what I could have ever imagined. Where do we go from here?
It's already crossed beyond what I could have ever imagined. Where do we go from here?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:02 pm to Janky
quote:
They are going to frick around and get RVW brought back and overturned.
Truer words have never been spoken.
And these pro “choice” people Would deserve that fate.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why do you post these misleading topic headlines? If the National Review says so, then it's all right with you, I guess, right?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:05 pm to texridder
What’s misleading, texdiddler?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:07 pm to Smeg
quote:
It seems every single day the left moves the line of sickness and depravity a little further.
How can any blue collar Democrat remain in this party of depraved immoral individuals?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:09 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Why are trying to defend this you sick frick
quote:
Gilbert: So how late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated it would impair the mental health of the woman?
Tran: Or physical health.
Gilbert: Okay. I’m talking about mental health.
Tran: I mean, through the third trimester. The third trimester goes all the way up to 40 weeks.
Gilbert: So to the end of the third trimester?
Tran: Yes. I don’t think we have a limit in the bill.
Gilbert: So where it’s obvious that a woman is about to give birth, she has physical signs that she’s about give birth, would that still be a point at which she could still request an abortion if she was so certified? [pause] She’s dilating?
Tran: Mr. Chairman, you know, that would be a decision that the doctor, the physician, and the woman would make.
Gilbert: I understand that. I’m asking if your bill allows that.
1
Tran: My bill would allow that, yes.
This post was edited on 1/29/19 at 8:10 pm
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News