- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vance vs Poli board experts re: 300 billion in Iran deal
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
....why?
spin
1
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:37 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Do you know more than the vice president when it comes to the current situation in Iran and how the deal will work? Yes or no?
You understand that you can't compel me to answer shitty questions? Yes or no?
Your logic is that the presence of knowledge is directly proportional to the validity of the action. Stated differently, the more someone knows, the more correct their actions are. That is not valid.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:41 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
You understand that you can't compel me to answer shitty questions?
in other words you're full of shite...... we already knew that from your other posting here
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:43 pm to jammajin
quote:
spin
What spin?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:47 pm to joshnorris14
Ahhh that’s what I thought. My logic is that I trust this current admin to do what’s best for the US long term given the circumstances in Iran. I don’t get daily intel briefs. Do you? You on the other are guided by TDS and would have found something to bitch about regardless of what the agreement said.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:47 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:Do you know WTF an MOU is?
If it ain't in writing, it doesn't mean shite.
I don't care if it is DJT, JD, Rubio, or Albert fricking Einstein doing the "explaining".
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:47 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
My logic is that I trust this current admin to do what’s best for the US long term given the circumstances in Iran.
You should question them after they got us into this stupid war.
This MOU should solidify that questioning.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why is that?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:30 pm to NC_Tigah
All they know is OMB
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:31 pm to jbdawgs03
Sounds like a good idea.
They won’t be so at to send drones to a country that is part of $300 million giving campaign to it.
They won’t be so at to send drones to a country that is part of $300 million giving campaign to it.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:33 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Do you know more than the vice president when it comes to the current situation in Iran and how the deal will work? Yes or no?
He sounded like a member of the Obama admin trying to sell the JCPOA
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:33 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
If it ain't in writing, it doesn't mean shite.
It won't mean shite to Iran if it is in writing.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:34 pm to jbdawgs03
The text should speak for itself. Commentary or editorial may be a slanted angle.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:37 pm to AGGIES
Id rather spend 300 billion arming the protestors and bombing the hell out of Iran.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:42 pm to AGGIES
It does but apparently the never Trump
Coalition is counting on useful idiots like Josh Norris to spew propaganda
Coalition is counting on useful idiots like Josh Norris to spew propaganda
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:43 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
with no anticipated US contribution
Pay very close attention to that statement. What seems off?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:46 pm to ronricks
I know. I know.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:47 pm to jbdawgs03
Exactly
There isn’t an outcome that this hack wouldn’t have condemned.
There isn’t an outcome that this hack wouldn’t have condemned.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:48 pm to jbdawgs03
Dawg, I have posted similar several times today. The bots and idiots can't be reasoned with.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:52 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
The $300 billion reconstruction fund would be paid for by Gulf Arab countries, with no anticipated US contribution, officials said.
Anyone else bothered by this qualifier here?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News