- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vance being brought back to the White House in the last hour
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:18 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:18 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
This better mean some positive war moves. I want them totally decimated. If we have to nuke, now is the time.
fricking retarded 60 year old dipshit
1
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:19 pm to tide06
quote: If we have to nuke, now is the time.
Are you a Christian? Just curious.
We can use tactical nukes —- far from major population area —- to destroy their uranium stockpiles
Are you a Christian? Just curious.
We can use tactical nukes —- far from major population area —- to destroy their uranium stockpiles
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:21 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You did exactly that by saying I've been in lockstep with those who would support dropping nukes on Iran
....
They're incapable of being honest.
Okay, honest guy. Prove it.
Show me in the post where I said it was because you don't hate Jews.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:24 pm to Forever
quote:
fricking retarded 60 year old dipshit
Its so stupid... lol:
Then afterwards they'll scratch their collective heads wondering why Iran still wants a nuclear deterrent.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:24 pm to The Baker
quote:
Okay, honest guy. Prove it.
No need for me to. You just did, like a fricking idiot. If I have been in "lockstep" with those who would support dropping nukes on Iranians, the implication is crystal clear and shouldn't need explaining to anyone. The implication is that since I support Israel (which isn't even frickin true) that I would therefore support dropping nukes on Iran.
Your stupidity is like revolutionary.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:26 pm to AlterEd
quote:
No need for me to. You just did, like a fricking idiot.
Well I made it super easy for you to show me and you still couldnt.
quote:
The implication is that since I support Israel (which isn't even frickin true) that I would therefore support dropping nukes on Iran.
I think you're just hallucinating.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:27 pm to Juan Betanzos
quote:
We can use tactical nukes —- far from major population area —- to destroy their uranium stockpiles
So you’re proposing the use of tactical nuclear weapons to take out the nuclear dust which per the WH is all that remains of their nuclear stockpile?
How do you see that opening up the strait of Hormuz?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:27 pm to The Baker
quote:
Then afterwards they'll scratch their collective heads wondering why Iran still wants a nuclear deterrent.
For reason of an anonymous internet message board poster thousands of miles away shite talking them?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:27 pm to The Baker
Alright, run along retard. That's enough attention for you.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:28 pm to joshnorris14
Negotiating with leaders who DO NOT value any human life is a waste of time......
Start dropping the arsenal!
Start dropping the arsenal!
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:30 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The amount of DVs in this thread dont want resolve they live to be OMB.
So downvoting the suggested use of nuclear weapons is resolving to be “OMB”?
Trying to understand the threshold to avoid being labeled anti MAGA, TDS or OMB, keeping in mind Trump hasn’t actually proposed that only some people on this board.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:31 pm to tide06
quote:
So downvoting the suggested use of nuclear weapons is resolving to be “OMB”?
correct
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:39 pm to Jizzy08
quote:Dropping a couple of tactical nukes that are limited to 1 or 2 kilotons, with the promise that much higher yields are available to us if they wish to continue fricking around should elicit a sense of urgency to settle matters.
No one is dropping a nuke
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:39 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
shite don't want our boys on the ground.
On this we agree.
quote:
So nuke or invade or come home empty handed.
If you find yourself deciding that genocide via nuclear weapons is the solution to a problem you yourself are the problem.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:45 pm to hogcard1964
quote:Preemptive nuclear strike? That would make everything great, yes?
If we have to nuke, now is the time.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:46 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
If we have to nuke, now is the time.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:46 pm to Pragmatist2025
What are we targeting exactly with said stinger nukes?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:47 pm to The Baker
quote:
correct
There’s a pro MAGA faction on this board that’s lost its damn mind.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:49 pm to tide06
Yeah, well, it appears that there are some on the other side of things than that group who quite apparently didn’t have much mind to lose in the first place.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:53 pm to Juan Betanzos
quote:
We can use tactical nukes —- far from major population area —- to destroy their uranium stockpiles
That's far too nuanced. However, I'd like to see a lot more damage.
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News