- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vance being brought back to the White House in the last hour
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:27 pm to DiamondDog
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:27 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
Vietnam ruined this country.
Iraq and Afghanistan killed its resolve.
because they were all stupid decisions and their effect was way too indirect to be supported here at home.
9/11 was perpetuated by a radical Saudi group... lead by a Saudi nepo baby mad man who we had cornered in tora bora in 2001. we let him go.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:27 pm to hogcard1964
quote:It is kinda nutty to wish this...
Washington Times reporting a peace deal announcement is imminent
Fark that.
I want them destroyed.
This isnt watching a movie on the interwebs.
End our involvement would be nice, dont get hyped with us nuke bombing them..
I wonder about the speed of Vances motorcade being him in the OP video.
They could communicate remotely. Are people wishcasting Trumps health again?
Even @grok seems presumptuous
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:30 pm to hogcard1964
unfeeling, bloodthirsty warmonger got it.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Only retards would condone the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.
You've been lockstep with those retards since this whole thing started... now you're going soft?
he's got 18 upvotes.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:30 pm to AlterEd
Really? The country that has made specific organized efforts to research and potentially build nuclear weapons dating back to the late 1980s in order to attack Isreal as well as the U.S.? That country?
Don't destroy them?
You sure?
Don't destroy them?
You sure?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:31 pm to FiddleHead
Seek testicles and brain matter.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:32 pm to The Baker
quote:
I'll absolutely downvote the evil idiots who want to nuke 90 million people
If troops are used will you lead the way?
Be the tip of the spear?
Was nuking Japan done by evil idiots?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:33 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Seek testicles and brain matter.
Nuking children is the most bitchmade thing I can think of.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:34 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Really? The country that has made specific organized efforts to research and potentially build nuclear weapons dating back to the late 1980s in order to attack Isreal as well as the U.S.? That country?
Don't destroy them?
You sure?
We're talking about Iran. What country are you talking about?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:35 pm to toratiger
quote:
If troops are used will you lead the way?
Be the tip of the spear?
That's rich coming from a guy who actually supports the conflict in general.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:35 pm to joshnorris14
You have been proven to provide false information around here. GTFO already fricknut
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:36 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You have been proven to provide false information around here. GTFO already fricknut
What are you talking about?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:37 pm to The Baker
I doubt many would agree on nuking the country. But if we weren't willing to finish the job (rid them of their nuclear capabilities) then we should have never entered in the first place. Now, we lose face, give them more power than they had before, and make them look like they have defeated us. That will only strengthen the IRGC's control over Iran and probably allow for the funding of many more terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis. Mission Accomplished.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:40 pm to DD_Rolltide
quote:
I doubt many would agree on nuking the country. But if we weren't willing to finish the job (rid them of their nuclear capabilities) then we should have never entered in the first place. Now, we lose face, give them more power than they had before, and make them look like they have defeated us. That will only strengthen the IRGC's control over Iran and probably allow for the funding of many more terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis. Mission Accomplished.
I would say look at the upvotes.
The rest of your statement is absolutely correct. We should have never gotten involved for this very reason. Iran is too entrenched and capable (unfortunately). The regime is looking at one singular outcome... survival.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:41 pm to Sp0728
quote:
Literally zero threat to the USA
quote:
Sp0728
Oh boy.
Tell us more
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:41 pm to jbdawgs03
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:43 pm to joshnorris14
A MOU isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:43 pm to joshnorris14
If we don't achieve a clear, unambiguous victory in this deal (some would say "unconditional surrender"), hasn't Iran just been emboldened completely and given the same geopolitical trump card (no pun intended) as a nuke?
Back to top


0







