Started By
Message

re: Vaccine fear mongering

Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:13 am to
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
7953 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:13 am to
quote:

They are coming out with non mRNA vaccines.
you meant to say they are coming out with vaccines, right
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:13 am to
Ahhhh someone has come over from the NextDoor App it appears.
Posted by BusterW
LA.
Member since Jul 2021
307 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:27 am to
Why don't you enlighten the fear mongers among us.People better be afraid. Because this shite is never going away, you know why?

Because or fricking Govt. is responsible for it. Nothing is gonna convince me otherwise, the fear mongering is coming from the people pushing this shite.

I'm not sick haven't had covid, AND if I did I'm not taking a shot that is Not gonna prevent me from getting it again, it might even kill me,

I don't know you very well, sounds like your the dipshit
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:43 am to
Why should I get a shot to ‘save’ the society that has done nothing but vilify my demographic for the past decade?
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
14977 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:52 am to
quote:

If you don’t want the vaccine don’t get it



Like I need your permission.

frick off dude, it's absolutely none of your business what I do or don't do
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146577 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:19 am to
poli is now the covid board and the OT is now poli lite.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:37 am to
quote:

It takes 5 minutes to find videos of experts explaining how improperly issued vaccines at the wrong time puts pressure to mutate faster.



You moron.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57261 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:42 am to
quote:

The virus may mutate and the vaccine may no longer be effective but why would it create a deadlier virus?


Aren’t you an MD? And you really are asking how this is possible?

Why don’t you start by reading papers submitted by other MDs and scientists?
Posted by limbaughnomicon
Member since Feb 2020
152 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:49 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/13/22 at 9:08 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51489 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:05 am to
quote:

Quit with the bullshite. If you don’t want the vaccine don’t get it. But there is no need to start making stuff up.


Okay.

quote:

NIH encourages researchers to investigate reported changes in menstruation after COVID-19 vaccination


Sure.

quote:

Axillary lymphadenopathy following intramuscular vaccine has been observed with influenza and human papilloma virus vaccines, and recently with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.2-4 We found that ipsilateral axillary nodal reactivity occurred after the first vaccine dose in 2 patients (5%) and after the second vaccine dose in 7 (26%); 4 patients (57%) after the second dose of the Moderna vaccine and 3 (15%) after the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. In the Moderna trial, axillary swelling and tenderness on patient survey was reported in 1322 (11.6%) patients after the first dose (567 [5%] placebo) and in 1654 (16%) after the second dose (444 [4.3%] placebo) of vaccine; in the Pfizer trial, only unsolicited reactions were recorded.


Enflamed lymph nodes can happen after a normal flu shot but for decades prior to this vaccine the medical advice was that if your lymph nodes are swollen for longer than two weeks you should speak to your doctor. Now?

quote:

“Enlarged lymph nodes are visible as early as one day after vaccination, and they can remain enlarged for a month or more,” says Dr. Desperito. (Keep in mind that while you may stop feeling a swollen lymph node, which can feel like a lump in your armpit, it may still be visible on a scan.) Call your doctor if you still feel a swollen lymph node after six weeks following your vaccine.



Now we move the goal posts back to 3x as long as was the previous advised period.

My argument on this has been and will always be that the problem is that we've rushed this. It normally takes 10-12 years for FDA approval with animal testing lasting a year then Phase I trials lasting a year (and that's not including Pre-Clinicals) yet here we are in what's actually Phase IV testing (4-5 years in) and the drug itself hasn't been in existence for two whole years yet.

There is precedence for this: Thalidomide.

Thalidomide went through 7 years of trials throughout the 1950's before being released in Europe in 1957. It quickly gained popularity and was in wide use by tens of thousands of people and being tested for use in the US before it was found to cause miscarriages and severe birth defects in 1961. That's a long-term effect which avoided trials somehow (in animal testing it had no issues at all, but then it didn't even make them drowsy despite dosages) yet we now have this less-than 2yr old concoction injected into well over 100M people in the US.

And when you fact-check if the process was rushed?

quote:

The vaccine developers didn’t skip any testing steps, but conducted some of the steps on an overlapping schedule to gather data faster.


They attempt to equate quality derived from observance over a period of time with quantity. That's not "science", that's "science-ism".

My point is and always has been: if you want to get the vaccine then get it, but do not attempt to mandate nor legislate (whether government or the private sector) that people must get it. That latter issue is what's causing the massive pushback from this board.
This post was edited on 8/9/21 at 7:17 am
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24600 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:15 am to
quote:

My point is and always has been, if you want to get the vaccine then get it. However, do not attempt to mandate nor legislate (whether government or the private sector) that people must get it. That latter issue is what's causing the massive pushback from this board.


This and don't lie about the side effects of the vaccines. Let people choose what to live with. Transparency has never been big governments strong suit.
This post was edited on 8/9/21 at 7:16 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57261 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:17 am to
He doesn’t have time to read all that

He needs you to convince him directly
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24857 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:18 am to
quote:

but don't bitch about the Government trying to get you to take the thing
if the government is pushing it, i will absolutely bitch about it. Government is anti Freedom per the NYT
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:22 am to
The more the Government pushes the vaccine the more push back there will be. Maybe the Government should stop pushing the vaccine and let people decide whether they should get it or not.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98558 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:23 am to
I don't fear monger about the vaccine.

I don't deride or criticize any person who CHOOSES to get it. My wife and children have taken the jab of their own volition.

What pisses me off is that people who have studied the issue and have concluded the "vaccine" is not for them are not being accorded the same level of respect.

Similarly, mandating vaccination is fricking ridiculous.
This post was edited on 8/9/21 at 7:48 am
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:38 am to
quote:

It takes 5 minutes to find videos of experts explaining how improperly issued vaccines at the wrong time puts pressure to mutate faster.


It works the exact same fashion for antibiotics.

Should we stop using them as well?

In case your cognitive dissonance prevents you from answering, let me help. The answer is no. You just use them more wisely.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57261 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:41 am to
quote:

It works the exact same fashion for antibiotics.

Should we stop using them as well?


You realize this question proves the opposing point right?

What happens if you get a bacterial infection and start taking antibiotics and immediately stop over and over? The bacteria becomes resistant in your body and you get sicker

Somewhat similar idea here - the weaker vaccine is, in principle, giving the virus more room to adapt into a more lethal variation

Whereas, if the nature took its course, the opposite would usually happen
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:46 am to
quote:

What happens if you get a bacterial infection and start taking antibiotics and immediately stop over and over? The bacteria becomes resistant in your body and you get sicker


That is the point of antibiotic stewardship. There is a suggested course of therapy that needs to be completed or until clinical improvement is documented.

I have no stance on telling others what to do in regards to the vaccine. Do what you want. I do not care. I do agree that the virus is gonna virus.

Regarding the post you responded to on antibiotics for microbial infections: I do have a stance on people lacking expertise telling me my business. You are out of your depth on the topic of antibiotics in the treatment of microbial infections.

Posted by ATW
Columbia, Mo
Member since Jul 2021
759 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:47 am to
quote:

This board is always preaching about fear mongering




Do the research you effing sheep.
Posted by ATW
Columbia, Mo
Member since Jul 2021
759 posts
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Possibly. But that doesn’t mean a deadlier virus.




Yet, it also might mean a deadlier virus.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram