- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
US Threatens UK: Increase Defense Spending, or Lose Support for Sovereignty Over the Faukl
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:10 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:LINK
European territories in the Western Hemisphere are not safe anymore.
Today, The Telegraph has issued a bombshell report (picked up by several other outlets by now) that reveals that the US is threatening to oppose Britain’s sovereignty over the Falkland Islands unless Andy Burnham increases the UK defense spending.
The proposal is reportedly among measures being prepared at the Pentagon to force NATO nations to fulfill their 5 percent of the GDP defense spending pledge.
A senior US official told The Telegraph that Britain was likely to receive ‘special attention’ in Washington’s review of its allies’ commitment to Nato, which will examine whether member nations have credible paths toward the target.
Officials in Washington believe that while Britain has the potential to be a leading defense partner, the defense investment plan, announced by Sir Keir Starmer in June, was not enough of a ‘step in the right direction’.
I would expect the UK to receive special attention because it has so much potential’, the official said of the review. ‘We will therefore continue efforts to incentivize and enable the UK to step up in a major way’.”
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:11 pm to Ailsa
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
“On the question of the Falklands, the official told The Telegraph: ‘I can say that they [conversations] are candid and nothing is being ruled out as far as options for encouraging the sort of burden-sharing that we seek’.
The island’s sovereignty has long been a contentious political issue – with Argentina maintaining that it should control the South Atlantic territory.
Britain and Argentina fought the 1982 Falklands War over the islands – with Argentina defeated but never dropping their claim.”
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:16 pm to Ailsa
You're either IN the Alliance or OUT. No more straddling the fence.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:22 pm to Ailsa
Good. Time to stop pretending these welfare states are our equals.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:22 pm to Ailsa
Need to remove them from 5 Eyes
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:52 pm to Ailsa
Also need to apply openness vs censorship. Want to see more free speech protections and protecting borders. An ally is no ally if they are controlled by the enemy…..
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:01 pm to Ailsa
Whoever the next President is, whether Dem or Repub, will have a lot of relationship mending to do for America.
There are far better ways to work with your allies than trolling, empty threats, or name calling.
There are far better ways to work with your allies than trolling, empty threats, or name calling.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:09 pm to The_Duke
quote:
There are far better ways to work with your allies than trolling, empty threats, or name calling.
First, these are not empty threats.
Second, if there are better ways to deal with our allies why is it that no other president has succeeded? Every President since HW Bush has pleaded with our “allies” to do their fair share, but none have had ANY success.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:16 pm to OU Guy
quote:
Need to remove them from 5 Eyes
More likely we will be the ones shut out if shite like this keeps up.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:28 pm to Penrod
quote:
Second, if there are better ways to deal with our allies why is it that no other president has succeeded? Every President since HW Bush has pleaded with our “allies” to do their fair share, but none have had ANY success.
No one is forcing the US to spend X amount of money on the military. We chose to do that so we can stay the number 1 power. We can stop at any time.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:31 pm to Ailsa
frick yeah. The GDP equity portion of the NATO treaty has always been horseshite with us getting screwed.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 9:57 pm to The_Duke
quote:
No one is forcing the US to spend X amount of money on the military. We chose to do that so we can stay the number 1 power. We can stop at any time.
That sword cuts both ways ….
Nobody forced the UK to sign up as a NATO member and contractually obligate themselves to a budget commitment…. a budget commitment that they are clearly ignoring despite repeated requests.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:02 pm to Ailsa
Good - we should back Argentina anyway, they are an actual ally, Britain no longer is
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:06 pm to The_Duke
quote:
There are far better ways to work with your allies
Allies? You sure about that?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:08 pm to The_Duke
quote:
The_Duke
Why are you so wrong about everything?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:16 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
Why are you so wrong about everything?
Wrong about what exactly? I know you guys don't live in the world where data matters but here you go.
"NATO's mandatory baseline requires member nations to spend at least 2.0% of their GDP on defense. The UK is currently projected to spend 2.6% of its GDP on defense, comfortably exceeding this minimum requirement. It remains the third-largest cash spender in the alliance, behind only the US and Germany."
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:17 pm to cadillacattack
The UK is meeting its agreed-upon numbers. No one is forcing the US to go above and beyond.
Popular
Back to top


10







