Started By
Message

US Threatens UK: Increase Defense Spending, or Lose Support for Sovereignty Over the Faukl

Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:10 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12257 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:10 pm
quote:

European territories in the Western Hemisphere are not safe anymore.

Today, The Telegraph has issued a bombshell report (picked up by several other outlets by now) that reveals that the US is threatening to oppose Britain’s sovereignty over the Falkland Islands unless Andy Burnham increases the UK defense spending.

The proposal is reportedly among measures being prepared at the Pentagon to force NATO nations to fulfill their 5 percent of the GDP defense spending pledge.

A senior US official told The Telegraph that Britain was likely to receive ‘special attention’ in Washington’s review of its allies’ commitment to Nato, which will examine whether member nations have credible paths toward the target.

Officials in Washington believe that while Britain has the potential to be a leading defense partner, the defense investment plan, announced by Sir Keir Starmer in June, was not enough of a ‘step in the right direction’.
I would expect the UK to receive special attention because it has so much potential’, the official said of the review. ‘We will therefore continue efforts to incentivize and enable the UK to step up in a major way’.”
LINK

Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12257 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:11 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

“On the question of the Falklands, the official told The Telegraph: ‘I can say that they [conversations] are candid and nothing is being ruled out as far as options for encouraging the sort of burden-sharing that we seek’.

The island’s sovereignty has long been a contentious political issue – with Argentina maintaining that it should control the South Atlantic territory.

Britain and Argentina fought the 1982 Falklands War over the islands – with Argentina defeated but never dropping their claim.”
Posted by America250
Member since Jun 2026
275 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:16 pm to
You're either IN the Alliance or OUT. No more straddling the fence.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
68287 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:22 pm to
Good. Time to stop pretending these welfare states are our equals.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
33653 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:22 pm to
Need to remove them from 5 Eyes
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
15215 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:52 pm to
Also need to apply openness vs censorship. Want to see more free speech protections and protecting borders. An ally is no ally if they are controlled by the enemy…..
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4699 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:01 pm to
Whoever the next President is, whether Dem or Repub, will have a lot of relationship mending to do for America.

There are far better ways to work with your allies than trolling, empty threats, or name calling.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 7:03 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57737 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

There are far better ways to work with your allies than trolling, empty threats, or name calling.


First, these are not empty threats.

Second, if there are better ways to deal with our allies why is it that no other president has succeeded? Every President since HW Bush has pleaded with our “allies” to do their fair share, but none have had ANY success.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72981 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:11 pm to
Shut up bitch. We ridin.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106362 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Need to remove them from 5 Eyes


More likely we will be the ones shut out if shite like this keeps up.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 7:17 pm
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
26077 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:17 pm to
frick’em
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49894 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:19 pm to
Donroe Doctrine ( ON / OFF )
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4699 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

Second, if there are better ways to deal with our allies why is it that no other president has succeeded? Every President since HW Bush has pleaded with our “allies” to do their fair share, but none have had ANY success.


No one is forcing the US to spend X amount of money on the military. We chose to do that so we can stay the number 1 power. We can stop at any time.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
28795 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 7:31 pm to
frick yeah. The GDP equity portion of the NATO treaty has always been horseshite with us getting screwed.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11414 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

No one is forcing the US to spend X amount of money on the military. We chose to do that so we can stay the number 1 power. We can stop at any time.


That sword cuts both ways ….

Nobody forced the UK to sign up as a NATO member and contractually obligate themselves to a budget commitment…. a budget commitment that they are clearly ignoring despite repeated requests.

Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
32474 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:02 pm to
Good - we should back Argentina anyway, they are an actual ally, Britain no longer is
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
12240 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

There are far better ways to work with your allies


Allies? You sure about that?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
12795 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

The_Duke


Why are you so wrong about everything?
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4699 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Why are you so wrong about everything?


Wrong about what exactly? I know you guys don't live in the world where data matters but here you go.

"NATO's mandatory baseline requires member nations to spend at least 2.0% of their GDP on defense. The UK is currently projected to spend 2.6% of its GDP on defense, comfortably exceeding this minimum requirement. It remains the third-largest cash spender in the alliance, behind only the US and Germany."
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4699 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:17 pm to
The UK is meeting its agreed-upon numbers. No one is forcing the US to go above and beyond.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram