- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US Supreme Court revives pro-Republican Texas voting map
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:49 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:49 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Will SC review the California’s recent gerrymandering too?
Is there a legal challenge to it?
There are two lawsuits challenging the California districting plan.
0
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:50 pm to JimEverett
Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the following.
What is a State? How does one define statehood? I can’t, not in this context, "I’m not a geologist.”
What is a State? How does one define statehood? I can’t, not in this context, "I’m not a geologist.”
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:52 pm to Bonkers119
You worked for Mary Landrieu, dork
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:09 pm to JimEverett
quote:
(except for intentionally drawing "racist" boundaries)
And that is about to go by the wayside as well.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:15 pm to JimEverett
After all...why not
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:19 pm to goatmilker
After all the noise after all the drama after all the theater it ended pretty much like I said
although I did think there was a chance it would be pushed back to a May election that didn't happen that's gonna save some people some money
although I did think there was a chance it would be pushed back to a May election that didn't happen that's gonna save some people some money
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:22 pm to Bourre
quote:
JimEverett
Yall remember all the leftist and TDS retards celebrating the lower courts ruling? lol, good times!!
I Suspect it's For their Personal feelings against Trump.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:36 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
The Supreme Court works for trump. So much for checks and balances.
Are you under the impression that "checks and balances" means "rock paper scissors"?
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:46 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Current districting practice is the single biggest factor behind why Congress is so ineffective.
wonder how it got that way?
Posted on 12/4/25 at 8:06 pm to BHTiger
It's about to be 6-2 because the DEI woman of color is about to get fired.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:12 pm to FLTech
quote:
t's about to be 6-2 because the DEI woman of color is about to get fired.
Wait what?
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:26 pm to FLTech
quote:
DEI woman about to get fired
Not gonna happen.
She's retarded.
She has no business on court.
Biden didn't even choose her himself.
But, it is what it is. We are stuck with that retard.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:30 pm to Privateer 2007
The AutoPen might have something to say about her hire
Posted on 12/4/25 at 10:13 pm to JimEverett
Wisconsin is getting ready to do away with two republican districts.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 10:21 pm to FLTech
quote:Good Lord
the DEI woman of color is about to get fired.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:09 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
The Supreme Court works for
The constitution. Sorry that bothers you. All the activist democrat judges enrich themselves and fight for their party. They make judgements based on feelings, politics, social justice, money, influence, and power. A most corrupt group doing the bidding of the left. Yet you throw out a feeble claim that you don’t even believe.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 12:04 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Wisconsin is getting ready to do away with two republican districts
Even IF they do, they probably won't have time to make it count for the 26 elections
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:13 am to Hampton
What seems to be lost in all of this. The TX map is not "in favor" of republicans. Its a redrawn "fair representation" which removes the previous gerrymandering.
In California's case it is furthering an already extremely gerrymandered map.
Typical, republicans view winning as fair. Dems review winning as absolutely screwing the people at large for their benefit. The supreme court is a good example, we get a fair constitutionalist and call it a win, they get an absolute idiot lunatic and call it a win.
In California's case it is furthering an already extremely gerrymandered map.
Typical, republicans view winning as fair. Dems review winning as absolutely screwing the people at large for their benefit. The supreme court is a good example, we get a fair constitutionalist and call it a win, they get an absolute idiot lunatic and call it a win.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 5:41 am to BoomerandSooner
Not for the Dems, they can sure dish it out but can't take it, a prime example of who they are,
Posted on 12/5/25 at 5:53 am to TigerIron
quote:
Are you under the impression that "checks and balances" means "rock paper scissors"?
He thinks Democrats should win at least half the cases at the Supreme Court, regardless of the constitutionality of their case.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News