Started By
Message

re: US release video of Reaper drone and Russian jet collision

Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:29 am to
Posted by Nole Man
Somewhere In Tennessee!
Member since May 2011
7181 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:29 am to
John Quill Powers
Call sign "Maveriski," gets laid tonight for sure!




Crappy pilots taking unnecessary risks.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46074 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:29 am to
quote:

It looks like one pass two different camera angles. You can still faintly see the yellow strips on the prop from the second camera. The prop has a dark shadow from the second camera angle making the yellow stripes difficult to see. Also, I do see two damaged prop fins.


Maybe....it's definitely the vid of a damaged drone prop but to make a 100% positive identification it's the same drone/prop? ....I can't watch those two vids and confidently say it's the same drone. I wish the DOD would have kept the video running so we could see the 2nd pass that damages the prop but they stop the vid after the first pass where the prop is not damaged and cut back to a vid showing the damaged prop.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

My thinking after watching the video was that it was gallons of fuel impacting the drone that bent the prop, not the Su-27.

Holy shite.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46074 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:32 am to
quote:

My thinking after watching the video was that it was gallons of fuel impacting the drone that bent the prop, not the Su-27. Can’t imagine that the propellers are designed to move through that much liquid mid-flight.


It's quite possible the density of the jet fuel combined with the speed of the dumped fuel impacting the drone prop could have bent the blades.......although that one blade is hooked pretty good.
This post was edited on 3/16/23 at 8:37 am
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26317 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Holy shite.

What?

That much fuel has plenty of mass/speed that the propellers are definitely not designed to handle in flight.

IMO it is more plausible than the plane managing to clip just one of the blades (and even then only bending it) without ostensibly doing anything else to the drone.
This post was edited on 3/16/23 at 8:36 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51609 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:34 am to
New rule: After the first attempt at spraying, the drone operator tries to target the jet's intakes.

That would stop this sort of "hold-my-beer" bullshite with the quickness.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24943 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Wouldnt it be a better idea to dump fuel on top of the drone and not below it?


Trajectory, flight path, moving target….

Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

That much fuel has plenty of mass that the propellers are definitely not designed to handle in flight.

Let's say your goofy theory is correct. What's the difference? The Su took down a reaper. Wouldn't have made a difference if the pilot tossed a dildo at the drone.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26317 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Let's say your goofy theory is correct. What's the difference? The Su took down a reaper. Wouldn't have made a difference if the pilot tossed a dildo at the drone.

There is no difference. It is just an observation.

I don’t see how the Su-27 would have hit just one propeller blade without taking it off completely or hitting any of the stabilizers/wings on the drone, which extend to the sides of and above the propeller.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123908 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Looks like a different prop...the first prop has yellow stripes and on the video showing the prop after the collision I don't see the yellow stripes.
Yes it does! Wow!
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

There is no difference. It is just an observation.

I don’t see how the Su-27 would have hit just one propeller blade without taking it off completely or hitting any of the stabilizers/wings on the drone, which extend to the sides of and above the propeller.

Ok. I'm arguing with myself then, lol. I have no issue with your opinion.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30778 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

What video are you watching,,, the Russian jet was above the US drone.


The russian jet is clearly below the reaper when he starts dumping fuel. He ends up above the drone, but thats why he hits it.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30778 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Trajectory, flight path, moving target….


I didnt say its harder than it looks obviously. Why wouldnt he just come back around when he could do it right instead of looking like an idiot?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118773 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:43 am to
quote:

The Su took down a reaper. Wouldn't have made a difference if the pilot tossed a dildo at the drone.



A lot of DoD and State Department officials would get noticeably excited.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I didnt say its harder than it looks obviously. Why wouldnt he just come back around when he could do it right instead of looking like an idiot?

Because he's Russian.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46074 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:

quote:That much fuel has plenty of mass that the propellers are definitely not designed to handle in flight.

Let's say your goofy theory is correct. What's the difference? The Su took down a reaper. Wouldn't have made a difference if the pilot tossed a dildo at the drone.


Let's agree on this. If f the US was engaged in a skirmish with a CCP or Russia backed nation....let's say it's Mexico or some other South American country and the CCP/Russia had a drone relaying surveillance and targeting information to military forces hostile to the US we would drop that drone wherever it's flying if we were to acquire targeting information.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27480 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:49 am to
Maybe we should stop flying drones over there, eh? Or, just demolish Russia and stop playing patty cake?
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Maybe we should stop flying drones over there, eh?

Why? International waters...Turkey has no issue with it.


We're allowed to walk with our balls hanging out and drop US dollars bills on a majority of dining room tables around the world because of our military presence. The moment the USA starts "minding its business" is the moment the USA becomes just like any other country.
This post was edited on 3/16/23 at 8:58 am
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:58 am to
How many hours of video was fabricated?

How many hours of video is forbidden to be seen?

What levels of censorship is the US using in this?

GOONS
This post was edited on 3/16/23 at 9:01 am
Posted by Goonie02
Member since Dec 2019
2510 posts
Posted on 3/16/23 at 9:00 am to
so the reports about the SU-27 crashing after the collision are false?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram