re: US' capture of Maduro likely broke international law according to experts

I was never not good.

His original point is still a shitty one

Maduro was no more the Pres of Ven than Osama was of Pak.

So if OBL claimed to be the Mayor of Abbotobad it's no different than a dictator claiming to be the rightful President of a country.

quote:

---

“Self-defense requires the existence of an armed attack," Milanovic told DW. "Simply allowing the exports of drugs from one country to another is not an armed attack and has never been treated as an armed attack."

---

This is just stupid. With this logic, China could hack our power grid and cause millions of deaths, but we couldn't do anything about it because it wasn't an "armed attack."

So one more time the US can operate militarily in any country in the world if it's for a terrorist.

But not a dictator that claims to be a President.

What are they going to do? Throw Trump in prison?



Get in line

I get it. We disagree.

That’s not unusual here.

Osama wasn’t the President of Pakistan.

Legally, there are differences.

I think, like some others, you are reading more into my statement than needed.

Maduro is a piece of shite and I think we disagree the right thing.

It’s just different than Osama.

You said you dgaf about the sovereign nation of Pakistan so we can rock and roll in every country in the world.

But for a dictator that internationally is considered a dictator we can't.

Trump wipes his arse with the international law.

But you think it was wrong in the instance no?

Because he is a President no?