- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:14 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
If that’s the case, then the driver unloaded 5 shots in to Garret as he approached the vehicle.
I have a hard time believing that the 1st five rounds are not from the rifle. The report is longer and drawn more out with a deeper echo than the last 3. The last 3 shots are sharper, less echo. I can sense the power of the round in the first 5, not as much in the last 3. The fact that the cameraperson is hiding wouldn't change this unless the phone was placed in the pocket or covered somehow.
If I had to guess, the recoil shocked Mr. Foster and his first round was his most "accurate" and he missed, leading to successive misses as he doesn't have the time/knowledge/muscle memory to keep the weapon on target.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:15 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Can the shooter still walk given Garrett had the gun coming up to the car?
Absolutely. You don’t have to wait for a guy to shoot you before you’re defending yourself.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
The first round of shots heard on the video is from the car. The second round is Garrett's friend firing back. Don't let them lie to you.
THINGS ARE GETTING SPICY
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:22 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
If that’s the case, then the driver unloaded 5 shots in to Garret as he approached the vehicle.
1st 5 rounds were not a pistol. Point blank range of an automobile, and you miss? The interview prior to the incident clearly indicated this guy was looking for trouble. He found the wrong guy.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:23 pm to BobBoucher
quote:That supports nothing. That's what a still image is. A "snapshot" in time. He could have literally been in the process of raising the rifle when the photo was taken.
This supports the still image earlier in this thread. Looks like Garrett is holding the AK downward. Wouldn’t make sense to fire 5 warning shots downward.
It's pretty hard to believe that the rifle toting dead guy wasn't the one that fired the 5 rifle-sounding rounds. The most telling evidence is that that banshee doesn't start wailing until after the final 3 shots. Those are the ones that took out Garrett, in self defense.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
I guess that could’ve happened.
It doesn’t change much.
It’s weird watching people lie about things you can see. An Austin city councilman said it was sickening watching the car barrel through the protesters.
It doesn’t change much.
It’s weird watching people lie about things you can see. An Austin city councilman said it was sickening watching the car barrel through the protesters.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:30 pm to the808bass
You're driving a car, and it gets surrounded by a mob, and someone with an AK 47 starts threatening you (and possibly fires a few rounds off). There is no organized law enforcement coming to your aid. You are forced to shoot your way out of this.
You are currently in:
a) Mogadishu
b) Beirut
c) Medellin
d) Austin, TX
Who picks D out of this list, before this weekend?
I'm waiting on the big-name D's to take a loss on this, and throw the guy under the bus. I mean, this is why soccer moms are buying Glocks instead of cleats for the kids right now. It's a fricking nightmare scenario for America.
You are currently in:
a) Mogadishu
b) Beirut
c) Medellin
d) Austin, TX
Who picks D out of this list, before this weekend?
I'm waiting on the big-name D's to take a loss on this, and throw the guy under the bus. I mean, this is why soccer moms are buying Glocks instead of cleats for the kids right now. It's a fricking nightmare scenario for America.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
watching the car barrel through the protesters.
yeah i saw lots of arguing about this on the LM post comments
some people said he "ran a red light" and others said he took a (legal) right on red
some say he "barrelled into protesters" and others say he did everything not to
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn’t see the car move.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:39 pm to the808bass
i haven't even watched the video just watching people who did say 180 opposite things
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:39 pm to Chromdome35
Lesson learned for Garrett Foster...


Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:41 pm to the808bass
There’s at least one video out there showing the car making a right into the direction the “protestors” were coming from. Then it appears that the car quickly stops. Presumably because there were idiots in the middle of the street.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that's the whole idea behind these "protests"
it's been this way since before Charlottesville, even
show up, start a fight, and then when there is a response, claim that you were innocent and saintly and you're facing unlawful response
Wanted it to be said again.
made my day SFP. Thanks.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/20 at 11:35 am
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:49 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
There’s at least one video out there showing the car making a right into the direction the “protestors” were coming from. Then it appears that the car quickly stops. Presumably because there were idiots in the middle of the street.
That’s what the caption of a video says. I still haven’t seen the car move.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:50 pm to Wolfhound45
***whistles softly "a-hunting we will go, a-hunting we will go..."***
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:52 pm to the808bass
Liberal Hank, who is an attorney (not sure if he has ever mentioned that) says video evidence is the worst kind of evidence.
You should be more “objective”.
You should be more “objective”.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:55 pm to Rebel
He is a "new poster."
WELCOME REDDIT fig, DARTHRAHVIN
WELCOME REDDIT fig, DARTHRAHVIN
Popular
Back to top


0









