- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Under Armour Collapses, Down 75% From Highs After Cutting Outlook (Again)
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:28 am to UPT
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:28 am to UPT
Wow, Bryce Harper is white?
I've heard that name, but no idea who he was.
Always assumed he was black. Maybe because Tennessee had some messed up crap with a recruit named Bryce something around the Kiffin era, and that just conflated in my mind.
I've heard that name, but no idea who he was.
Always assumed he was black. Maybe because Tennessee had some messed up crap with a recruit named Bryce something around the Kiffin era, and that just conflated in my mind.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:30 am to Sunbeam
Never heard of Lindsay Vonn.
I'd hit it.
I'd hit it.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:31 am to CAD703X
They need to find new non apparel cash flows while they still have the chance.
Ugly ugly but their problems are fixable.
Ugly ugly but their problems are fixable.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 10:32 am
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:35 am to DuncanIdaho
quote:
internal operational issues
Ahem, uh
You are intelligent enough to understand what that means, right?
quote:
After Trump uninvited Under Armour (UA) endorser Stephen Curry to the White House and lashed out at some NFL players, the sportswear brand tweeted Saturday that it "stands by our Athletes for free speech, expression and a unified America."
But the company later deleted that tweet and replaced it with one that adds the word "flag."
"@UnderArmour stands for the flag and by our Athletes for free speech, expression and a unified America," the updated tweet reads.
Curry is trying to tell UA how to run its business. And look how that has worked out. Same for the NFL, with its employees telling the owners what to do
Rule #1: The customer is always right. Not the employees
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:37 am to kingbob
quote:
Their fishing shirts were THE fashion item in Ascension Parish yet they would never order more at their Tanger outlet location.
This is the trashiest sentence I've ever read lol
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:38 am to CAD703X
quote:I think this has less to do with PC and more to with their shite being expensive. Feel free to pat yourself on the back though.
Sorry your shitty company has such a shitty CEO who put PC ahead of sound business practices.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:40 am to CAD703X
i like a lot of their stuff, but most of it's insanely overpriced.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:40 am to GumboPot
quote:
I think Adidas is cutting into UA market big time.
Well they did spend a lot of money buying coaches and players!
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:42 am to CAD703X
There is no cultural backlash . There is no cultural backlash. Say it with me . There is no...
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:50 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Under Armor's primary problem from a marketing standpoint is they have been playing dangerously close to being a FUBU type marketing campaign.
There's a fine line between "look at us, we're cool" and "look, we aren't really for white people".
Their problem was putting their product EVERYWHERE. Too saturated...no longer cool.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:53 am to CAD703X
Not a big fan of underarmour. Think their wicking technology is complete horseshite. Anything not cotton or absorbent can be called wicking because the material will not absorb it.
Underarmour is stuff made out of cheap man-made materials. 25 years ago no one wanted a shirt made out of nylon or rayon.
Underarmour is stuff made out of cheap man-made materials. 25 years ago no one wanted a shirt made out of nylon or rayon.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:55 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I mean, the reality is, UA, Adidas, Nike, New Balance, etc are completely interchangeable. There's no real compelling PRODUCT reason to choose one over the other.
For those folks, brand is basically 100% of the deal.
I've never bought any UA gear before only b/c I just never really liked it. Nike's stuff for the most part is solid other than their workout tshirts which are POS.
Thanks for the input
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:56 am to DuncanIdaho
N E W B A L A N C E
T
R
U
M
P
T
R
U
M
P
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:57 am to marinebioman
quote:
CLICK CLACK
Yeah this head ball coach!
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:58 am to el Gaucho
Fishing requires specific purpose-built apparel?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:01 am to Tridentds
quote:True, but the stuff back then was itchy and just not comfortable. I am not sure when it happened or who did it, but today's synthetic shirts are awesome.
Underarmour is stuff made out of cheap man-made materials. 25 years ago no one wanted a shirt made out of nylon or rayon
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:09 am to ShortyRob
quote:
ShortyRob
quote:
Under Armor's primary problem from a marketing standpoint is they have been playing dangerously close to being a FUBU type marketing campaign.
There's a fine line between "look at us, we're cool" and "look, we aren't really for white people".
LOL...You're completely and utterly off-base. They had Lindsey Vonn and effing Willie Robertson from Duck Dynasty featuring in commercials for their products. They are far more invested in hunting and fishing, tactical and military wear than Nike is and that's by several orders of magnitude.
Don't let that get in the way of the narrative though.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:12 am to flyAU
quote:
AKA "We have no clue what we are doing"
Pretty damn fitting
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:12 am to Pettifogger
quote:Jordan Speith is the answer.
UA is huge with suburban white kids
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News