- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:49 pm to 4cubbies
Right but you said a “warranties search” was conducted. I don’t know what that is. Could you explain it?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:50 pm to 4cubbies
quote:that's exactly what trotsky said
Idk why emotions always run so high here
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:51 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Police generally need search warrants to conduct searches. Searching without first obtaining a search warrant would constitute a warrantless search.
You do not need a “warrant” to conduct a search incident to arrest.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:52 pm to 4cubbies
Long night, slow flow pro?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:52 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Police generally need search warrants to conduct searches. Searching without first obtaining a search warrant would constitute a warrantless search.
It's more BS in the article
quote:
When police lawfully arrest someone, they may search:
The person
Clothing and belongings
The area within the person’s “immediate control” (to check for weapons or evidence)
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:53 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
It was a ghost gun. He should have worn gloves and ditched the gun next to the body. He never would have been caught.
You haven't read the digital forensics they used to track him down. His arrest has very little to do with the gun.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:53 pm to 4cubbies
Confessions are great to have for convictions but obviously are not absolutely needed in all convictions.
I’m not saying the defense attorney argument is valid.
I’m not saying the defense attorney argument is valid.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:54 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
My friend called me this morning as soon as my eyes opened to debrief this
These commies
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:55 pm to Rip Torn
Delete
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:56 pm to Riverside
quote:
“warranties search”
Just what it says. A search without a warrant. There are exceptions to admissibility for evidence that is obtained with a warrantless search.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:56 pm to Riverside
quote:
Right but you said a “warranties search” was conducted. I don’t know what that is. Could you explain it?
Read the article. I didn’t make that determination.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:56 pm to 4cubbies
Yes, we get it. You are excited this might get a guilty murderer off free because he killed someone you hate personally & politically because of what his job was.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:56 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Do police have to leave you alone if you tell them you don’t want to talk?
No. You don't have to keep talking to them either. If you do, that is your decision. Simply saying "I don't want to talk" isn't good enough. You have to also not talk.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:57 pm to 4cubbies
You are disgusting, and your kids will be emotionally fricked when they get older. Poor things :(
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:57 pm to toratiger
Cubbies is a leftist and they support murder. They’re pure evil
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:57 pm to Errerrerrwere
She’s actually from Talulah but we met in BR.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:57 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Just what it says. A search without a warrant. There are exceptions to admissibility for evidence that is obtained with a warrantless search.
Since when does this apply to a bag you had with you when you were arrested?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:58 pm to G2160
quote:
These commies
Only a smooth brain would read the article and think the defense was magically going to get all this evidence thrown out.
It's a defense team with little shot of winning. Of course, they are going to sling poo at the wall.
Imagine being retarded enough to read the article, and be so amazed by it because you don't fully understand it, then post it here like it's worthy of discussion.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:59 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
No. You don't have to keep talking to them either. If you do, that is your decision. Simply saying "I don't want to talk" isn't good enough. You have to also not talk.
Seems like the person being questioned could also just leave. Walk away.
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News