- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: turkey sold 1000s of children mainly survivors of the eq in 1999 to Jeffery Epstein's isla
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:54 am to RandRules
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:54 am to RandRules
quote:
Your argument is disingenuous. You are citing a study done by one of the most most liberal, left-wing colleges on planet earth, not to mention the fact that the psychology/psychiatry fields are absolutely dominated by liberal, left-wing doctors and so called “experts”. Take note of how many child psychologists are being/will be exposed as child rapists and worse in the Epstein files. Much like law, almost the entire psychology profession has been taken over by scumbags with no moral code.
It's impossible to discuss anything when "conservatives" dismiss every piece of information they don't like.
3
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:57 am to Ailsa
Sounds like this was the best shipping option as DHL, Federal Express, and USPS would have been 5x that amount to ship.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:01 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Satanists don't worship Satan in practice. They mock and deny the existence of God.
The ones at the top do. Baal isn't a new invention. It is history. Why is it so hard for people to believe that people today are pretty much like people 2000 years ago.
You are mistaken because there are so called Satanist that don't believe in Satan. These are the people that the top level satanist have tricked into going down the path that leads to Hell.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:03 am to ronricks
quote:
There were not 1,000's of children on Epstein's Island nor were there 1,000's of children run through the island. Think how ridiculous and sensational this claim is
Everything in our culture is so sensationalized. It leads to people shrugging their shoulders at accounts of 16 year olds being manipulated to recruit their friends into this stuff for Epstein and his friends.
I will never understand the inclination to see a post from some complete random on X, see the image that doesn't back up the post at all or provide context or sourcing, and then proclaim it true and get mad at anyone who doesn't join them in being manipulated by bad actors.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
hmmm lets see. FBI has a document that says a convicted trafficker was trafficking children and you dismiss it.
You madam are one sick individual. You lie on here constantly and are so in love with yourself that you can't seem the grasp that everyone here knows you do nothing but lie.
You madam are one sick individual. You lie on here constantly and are so in love with yourself that you can't seem the grasp that everyone here knows you do nothing but lie.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:09 am to BlackAdam
quote BlackAdam
quote:
But you can't find the occult/Satanic part with PP without engaging in your bad rhetoric (labeling any sin as "Satanic")
...
This is pretty silly when Satanism is an outright denial of the occult or the supernatural at all. Satanists don't worship Satan in practice. They mock and deny the existence of God.
................
False
quote:
But you can't find the occult/Satanic part with PP without engaging in your bad rhetoric (labeling any sin as "Satanic")
...
This is pretty silly when Satanism is an outright denial of the occult or the supernatural at all. Satanists don't worship Satan in practice. They mock and deny the existence of God.
................
False
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:11 am to RandRules
quote:
Your argument is disingenuous. You are citing a study done by one of the most most liberal, left-wing colleges on planet earth
You're attacking the source, not the information.
And you ignore this was just the first study, done for the DOJ way back in 1994. This was the start, not the finale. It's been over 30 years and many have confirmed this, or similar arguments, while none, to my knowledge, had adequately countered the conclusions/data.
quote:
not to mention the fact that the psychology/psychiatry fields are absolutely dominated by liberal, left-wing doctors and so called “experts”. Take note of how many child psychologists are being/will be exposed as child rapists and worse in the Epstein files. Much like law, almost the entire psychology profession has been taken over by scumbags with no moral code.
You clearly did not read up.
Psychology/psychiatry and religious organizations were where the panic emerged and the institutions who crystalized the false messaging.
quote:It's possible, and the Satanic Panic is evidence of how they have been weaponized by religious organizations in the past.
Mark my words, in the next few years, you will see the psychology and psychiatry fields weaponized by the Democrats/socialists.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:13 am to BlackAdam
quote:
This is pretty silly when Satanism is an outright denial of the occult or the supernatural at all. Satanists don't worship Satan in practice. They mock and deny the existence of God.
You're talking about something else. You're referencing the Church of Satan (COS) and/or The Satanic Temple (TST, which is an offshoot of the COS).
COS/TST and SRA are not overlapped outside the minds of the true believers of the Satanic Panic.
This thread is about SRA, not the annoying edge lord atheists defending the 1A.
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 10:14 am
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:14 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I will never understand the inclination to see a post from some complete random on X, see the image that doesn't back up the post at all or provide context or sourcing, and then proclaim it true and get mad at anyone who doesn't join them in being manipulated by bad actors.
There was a post on here the other day that linked a 'Catturd' X post that said Epstein rigged a Powerball drawing for himself and claimed it under his llc.
It ended up being a winner in Oklahoma who happened to claim the winnings under an alias with a very similar name. This is the level of stupidity we are dealing with on here posters that think every single 'Catturd' or 'Libs of tiktok' post is/are factual and they run here to post it
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 10:15 am
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:15 am to omegaman66
quote:
The ones at the top do. Baal isn't a new invention
And here you see further conflation of the concept of Satan.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Satan
Your friend
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:15 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I will never understand the inclination to see a post from some complete random on X, see the image that doesn't back up the post at all or provide context or sourcing, and then proclaim it true and get mad at anyone who doesn't join them in being manipulated by bad actors.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:16 am to omegaman66
quote:
FBI has a document that says a convicted trafficker was trafficking children and you dismiss it.
What document? When did I dismiss it?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:16 am to omegaman66
quote omegaman66
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
hmmm lets see. FBI has a document that says a convicted trafficker was trafficking children and you dismiss it.
You madam are one sick individual. You lie on here constantly and are so in love with yourself that you can't seem the grasp that everyone here knows you do nothing but lie
......
Satan is the father of all lies.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
hmmm lets see. FBI has a document that says a convicted trafficker was trafficking children and you dismiss it.
You madam are one sick individual. You lie on here constantly and are so in love with yourself that you can't seem the grasp that everyone here knows you do nothing but lie
......
Satan is the father of all lies.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:18 am to texag7
quote:
Your friend
Some people, like OP, are arguing Satan is the "father of all lies" in this thread.
I point out how people like OP are lying, and then get told Satan is my friend.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:38 am to 4cubbies
It depends on the credibility of the messenger. Personally, I first ask myself “Does the messenger stand to benefit financially or professionally for his/her position on the matter?” If the answer is yes, and it is definitely yes in this case, you owe it to yourself to do some independent research on the subject you want an answer for.
I’ve done plenty of research on the subject myself and i realize the atrocities people are capable of. Besides, it doesn’t take a genius to know that the guy heading up the Psychology dept at UC Davis is beholden to the Democrat party
I’ve done plenty of research on the subject myself and i realize the atrocities people are capable of. Besides, it doesn’t take a genius to know that the guy heading up the Psychology dept at UC Davis is beholden to the Democrat party
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:41 am to RandRules
quote:
It depends on the credibility of the messenger. Personally, I first ask myself “Does the messenger stand to benefit financially or professionally for his/her position on the matter?” If the answer is yes, and it is definitely yes in this case,
You think the DOJ in the 90s benefited from the Satanic Panic ruse being revealed? Quite the opposite.
And, again, you ignore this was just the start. 30 years of research all in one direction. Nothing of worth that I've found opposing it.
But I'm sure that's all part of the conspiracy, too.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:41 am to Timeoday
quote Timeoday
I see the Defendant stayed away from African-Americans.
....................
Wait til you hear about haiti.
I see the Defendant stayed away from African-Americans.
....................
Wait til you hear about haiti.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The continuation of that into murder of actual (post-birth) children.
It takes a very extreme path of devaluing human life to get to that point.
Does it?
Here's an article from 2018 about Democrats opposing a bill that would require babies who survived an abortion to receive the same medical care as any other baby. It claims they had voted against similar bills 73 times before this one. If it had been just this one bill you'd be thinking, "It could have been because of the pork attached to it," but that reasoning doesn't hold when we're talking about 74 bills. Some version of that bill gets reintroduced all the time and blocked every time, so we're no doubt up into the 80s by now.
LINK
It took the SCOTUS to finally kill partial birth abortion (pun intended).
Then there's the Northam Confession.
I'd say we're very close to accepting the murder of post-birth children as long as the concept of "abortion" is associated with the child.
Maybe one or two Democratic administrations away.
Especially because the birth demarcation is entirely arbitrary from the standpoint of the baby anyway. Why not move the goalpost any time you feel like it?
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 11:27 am
Posted on 2/3/26 at 11:12 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It's impossible to discuss anything when "conservatives" dismiss every piece of information they don't like.
You mean like the voluminous data that shows that women are healthier, happier, and wealthier when they are married than when they are single?
Yeah, I'm very familiar with the impasse you cited due to someone compulsively refusing to acknowledge data and holding the same standpoint despite all the evidence to the contrary.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News