re: Tulsi's Red Pilling is now complete.

Actually, lol-I agree that she's a Lefty but she is in complete alignment with the non-interventionist wing of the conservative/Libertarian movements. She is an anti-neocon in this regard and that's where we all latch onto her. That's a pretty gigantic thing. It's like why bash Glenn Greenwald on gun policy or trans this or that when we are aligned with him on this other major thing. It's politics and if you want a governing majority you have to find common cause as much as possible. Here I am smoking a Pall Mall:

Avoid. she is a WEF young global leader. Just like trudeau. She is a commie trying to sound reasonable. Like beto recently.

quote:

---

She's one of the most liberal politicians out there and an even bigger gun grabber than Feinstein. You fricking idiots simp so hard for her because she's hot and says a few okay things.

---

Exactly! She also provides a beautiful beard for all those pinko republicans that everyone around here loves to hate. Until it comes time to vote, of course.

Ask yourself why the republican establishment would endorse and promote a marxist/socialist democrat. If you can't figure it out, maybe you are part of the problem.

Uh, no, she's HOT!

quote:

---

Y’all need to cut her some slack.

---

Can't do it. Once a rattlesnake, always a rattlesnake. Once a Democrat, always a rattlesnake.

When Tulsi stood on that stage with 20 other communists vying for the nomination, she raised her hand in agreement with all the rest of them.

Her "red pilling" is not complete. She's a straight up Socialist and that won't change.

I admire her disdain towards the MIC, but that's about it. I honestly have no clue why the dumb fricks organizing the CPAC would have even invited her in the first place. Her outspoken criticism of the American Wehrmacht only places her barely to the right of Bernie Sanders.

This is exactly why the middle keeps moving farther and farther to the right. My political views haven't changed much over the last 20 years. I'm a conservative minarchist, registered Independent. 20 years ago, that put me barely on the right side of the middle. Today, it puts me into the "fringe right-wing extremist" category. I didn't change a bit. The middle moved. That's why things like inviting full blown progressives to the CPAC is, IMHO, a huge mistake. The pendulum never swings back to the right as far as it does to the left. The center of gravity is merely shifted to create the illusion that nothing has changed.

quote:

---

I voted for her for President. *

* there was an important local race where I needed to vote in the Dem primary. I cast my vote for her for president

---

I did the same in Texas. I voted in the Dem primary for Obama just to keep that state out of reach for Hillary. In retrospect, not sure Hillary would have been the better choice. I doubt she would have weaponized the government against the citizens the way Obama did. She would have focused on how to build up her nest egg, not some ideological initiative that she's been working on for years as a manchurian candidate.