1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
If you think calling Tucker’s comments about Mohamed an “endorsement” is inaccurate, then what term would you prefer us to use? How can we more accurately describe Tucker’s fawning comments about a radical Islamic communist in a binary Senate race?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 2:58 pm to Riverside
quote:
How can we more accurately describe Tucker’s fawning comments about a radical Islamic communist in a binary Senate race?
Why be so hysterical? He didn't fawn over El-Sayed. He noted what an awful candidate Rogers is.
His description of it being an America First position to favor spending tax dollars on American interests rather than on foreign interests is just objectively true.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:00 pm to DeBoar
Did the word 'endorse' change while I wasnt paying attention?
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:02 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
Did the word 'endorse' change while I was t paying attention?
Apparently. Brought to you by the people who claim to hate fake news.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Spending tax dollars on the green new deal, mass third world migration, and funneling tax dollars to public sector unions isn’t America First. That’s what Mohamed is supporting which Tucker fully knows.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:15 pm to Riverside
quote:his comments are intended to be 'illuminating' to the people he agrees with on most other issues, I.e. you and most of this boards conservatives.
If you think calling Tucker’s comments about Mohamed an “endorsement” is inaccurate, then what term would you prefer us to use? How can we more accurately describe Tucker’s fawning comments about a radical Islamic communist in a binary Senate race?
If you've followed Tucker for more than a few Twitter clicks you would know he's constantly trying to get his party to look at the other side and call out when their position on an issue is better.
In this particular case, spending $2T in America is objectively better than spending it in a pointless war with Iraq. Do you disagree with that?
Secondly, it being 9/11 shouldn't matter, because Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
You're whole argument is based on leftist emotion. "Muh don't criticize anything American because it's 9/11, even if that thing was incredibly dumb and most likely corrupt'
is that where trumpers are? Taking up for bush and Cheney's halliburton contracts?
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:17 pm to SportTiger1
Spending $2 trillion dollars on the democrat agenda is objectively terrible for America as the 4 years of Joe Biden’s presidency demonstrated.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Better question--- why are a few of you fighting so hard with semantics of support, endorse, back, get behind?
Have you flipped your Tucker apology tour wig?
Even if your word play of support, endorse, back, get behind wastes time...
Tucker said that El-Sayad was Trumpian and america first. Are you waiting for Tucker to blow him live, or what?
Have you flipped your Tucker apology tour wig?
Even if your word play of support, endorse, back, get behind wastes time...
Tucker said that El-Sayad was Trumpian and america first. Are you waiting for Tucker to blow him live, or what?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:21 pm to 3down10
quote:
If you are that worried about it, then nominate conservatives.
Again, if you nominate a conservative, I will vote for them.
Im specificly mocking you for thinking progressives will swap to loving America.
If you want to conserve the status quo, you're a conservative. The day democrats want to conserve theyre no longer progressive.
You might as well be claiming democrats are going to stop being progressive as your prediction. Its that retarded.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:33 pm to Epaminondas
Abdul Mohammed el Tucker.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:35 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Tucker said that El-Sayad was Trumpian and america first.
Did he? Timestamp it, link it, quote it.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:35 pm to 3down10
quote:
In the bible, Jesus talks about how the poor woman giving a very small donation was a much bigger thing than the rich person who give a lot more.
And? Who compelled any of them to “give?” You’re clearly a Democrat. Good Lord.
quote:
You however just care about yourself
You said in this very thread that you vote in your best interest. How are we any different. What did Jesus say about a plank in the eye? (Matthew 7 if you need a refresher)
quote:
I don't care what the rate of theft has been over the past 50 years. I care that the theft continues.
Income tax began in 1913. Yet you place it all on Trump. Guess this entire exercise is academic as you can never vote again. Because the theft will continue. Though I do recall a politician recently stating they wanted to do away with the income tax.
quote:
You don't fight shite.
It’s literally my career.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:35 pm to Riverside
Yall worry about a Muslim but dont care about all the dual citizens that are in office. Not 1 Muslim is on the Epstien list
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:36 pm to 3down10
quote:
Well for starters I work around numbers enough to not give a frick about an average. Plenty been below the average..because it's a fricking average.
Like you.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:37 pm to 3down10
quote:
If you don't understand my response, then I have to doubt you know what a conservative is. If you want my vote, nominate a conservative. It's not complicated.
Yes or no? Will you vote for a president if they don’t decrease spending?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:38 pm to RUFshreve
quote:
They cant fathom that anyone could stop supporting Trump, no matter how many promises he breaks and no matter how terrible this term has been.
This is where the confusion lies. I have posted statistics and policies. You two just hate Trump. Useful idiots.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:39 pm to 3down10
quote:
If you are that worried about it, then nominate conservatives. Again, if you nominate a conservative, I will vote for them.
And if it you vote dem! Brilliant. It always amazes me how you DSA losers won’t just admit who you are. It’s quite telling.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:39 pm to Riverside
quote:
That’s what Mohamed is supporting which Tucker fully knows.
Just stop.
In a wide-ranging discussion about politics between two conservatives, they both agreed that Rogers was a particularly bad choice for the Republicans.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:40 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
Sending billions to a foreign country and fighting their war isn't America first either.
Whataboutism.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News