
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Endorses Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed for US Senate
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:41 pm to RemyLeBeau
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:41 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
Apparently. Brought to you by the people who claim to hate fake news.
You have two options. Which would you vote for?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:41 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Im specificly mocking you for thinking progressives will swap to loving America.
If you want to conserve the status quo, you're a conservative. The day democrats want to conserve theyre no longer progressive.
You might as well be claiming democrats are going to stop being progressive as your prediction. Its that retarded.
Conservatives want to conserve the constitution, not the status quo.
I expect democrats to be democrats.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:42 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You have two options. Which would you vote for?
False dilemma.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
In a wide-ranging discussion about politics between two conservatives, they both agreed that Rogers was a particularly bad choice for the Republicans.
You have 2 choices. Which do you vote for?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:44 pm to 3down10
quote:
False dilemma.
Wrong. Don’t use phrases you don’t understand. Makes you look silly. If you don’t vote for Rogers it helps Al -Sayed.
Like I said… cutting off your nose to spite your face. A concept most of us learned at age 7. Maybe stop blaming others for your financial failures.
Concentrate on the good things. I’m sure you have a great family that loves you. That’s amazing. If I was single I wouldn’t blame you for that. Stop blaming the rich for your financial position.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:47 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And if it you vote dem! Brilliant. It always amazes me how you DSA losers won’t just admit who you are. It’s quite telling.
That's right. Neocon are at the bottom of my list.
1. Conservative
2. Libertarian (conservative at the federal level mostly)
3. Old school Democrats not named Clinton
4. Democrats, aka lenin marxists
5. Neocons, aka trotsky marxists.
You can keep crying about it, or you can compromise and support conservatives.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You have 2 choices. Which do you vote for?
Personally, I would have to vote for Rogers. Because of my Christian Worldview, I couldn't risk a Democrat Senate.
That's not what they were discussing. They were rightfully pointing out the primary reason Rogers is a vulnerable candidate. If asked I suspect both of them would of said, "Yes, I hope El-Sayed loses."
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:53 pm to Riverside
Tucker is a piece of shite.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:53 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And? Who compelled any of them to “give?” You’re clearly a Democrat. Good Lord.
Jesus told people they should help the poor. I don't remember him telling everyone they should give money to the Romans so the Romans can do it, aka a democrat/welfare system.
quote:
You said in this very thread that you vote in your best interest. How are we any different. What did Jesus say about a plank in the eye? (Matthew 7 if you need a refresher)
I've said repeated I vote for conservative issues. Which benefit everyone.
quote:
Income tax began in 1913. Yet you place it all on Trump. Guess this entire exercise is academic as you can never vote again. Because the theft will continue. Though I do recall a politician recently stating they wanted to do away with the income tax.
The entire country was enslaved in 1913. We need another Andrew Jackson.
quote:
It’s literally my career.
No, it's your career to pretend like you are fighting in the IRS. In reality, you are part of the system. Which makes it no coincidence that you defend it against everything except your ability to provide loopholes and such for customers as a service.
Tell me, in what ways have you worked towards getting rid of the IRS? If you are true fighter.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:53 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Personally, I would have to vote for Rogers. Because of my Christian Worldview, I couldn't risk a Democrat Senate.
Thank you. A straight answer.
quote:
That's not what they were discussing. They were rightfully pointing out the primary reason Rogers is a vulnerable candidate. If asked I suspect both of them would have said, "Yes, I hope El-Sayed loses."
Which makes the timing of all of this very suspect. If Tucker (and you) truly want El-Sayed to lose, why come out swinging at Roger’s before this election? They are the only two that can win. You can’t see how this strategy helps El-Sayed?
The time for all of this was during the primaries. Can you link Tucker or you bringing all of this up in the primaries? That would at least make it not appear as something you claim it isn’t.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:55 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yes or no? Will you vote for a president if they don’t decrease spending?
I will NOT vote for a republican who doesn't want to decrease spending or limit government.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:56 pm to 3down10
quote:
No, it's your career to pretend like you are fighting in the IRS. In reality, you are part of the system.
I work within the system that is present. I don’t work in a fantasy world. The IRS has stolen less from citizens through my efforts. What have you done? You have any tangible results. I’m not interested in a utopia. That’s as useless as arguing for socialism…which you have come very close to doing in this thread as well.
I would gladly vote to abolish the irs. I’d be fine. Find another area to practice. Tell us specifically what you have done while you call someone actually helping people not pay the IRS the bad guy. I’ll wait patiently while you say nothing about what you have done and prove my point.
The wealthy didn’t make you poor man. Stop blaming others. Take responsibility for yourself.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:58 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You have two options. Which would you vote for?
There are only two names on the ballot?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:58 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You have 2 choices. Which do you vote for?
It was a discussion of the political wisdom of the Republicans choosing Mike Rogers. They expressed rational opinions about why he was a bad choice for the Republicans.
Trump said that Paxton is an unappealing candidate, but people should vote for him. I'm sure, if asked, Saagar would have said "yes he's a bad choice, but vote for Rogers."
If the subject came up, Tucker probably would have said, "I wouldn't vote for anyone who doesn't put America First or is a Necon. I couldn't vote for Rogers. Of course, I couldn't support El-Sayed...or any Democrat. I would sit this one out."
Posted on 9/13/26 at 3:59 pm to 3down10
quote:
I will NOT vote for a republican who doesn't want to decrease spending or limit government.
Finally. Thank you for admitting you won’t vote for another President that gets elected in the general in your lifetime.
Decreases spending at the federal level hasn’t happened for 97 years. You want to make a difference. Baby steps. You’re acting like an infant.
What were your thoughts on doge?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:00 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
It was a discussion of the political wisdom of the Republicans choosing Mike Rogers. They expressed rational opinions about why he was a bad choice for the Republicans.
Can you link to you or Tucker having an opinion prior to the primary? That would at least give a hint of credibility that it isn’t meant to help El-Sayed.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:00 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
There are only two names on the ballot?
Only two that can win. Dummy.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:01 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Wrong. Don’t use phrases you don’t understand. Makes you look silly. If you don’t vote for Rogers it helps Al -Sayed.
Like I said… cutting off your nose to spite your face. A concept most of us learned at age 7. Maybe stop blaming others for your financial failures.
Concentrate on the good things. I’m sure you have a great family that loves you. That’s amazing. If I was single I wouldn’t blame you for that. Stop blaming the rich for your financial position.
You can vote 3rd party, you can stay at home. There are more than 2 choices.
My financial failures are a fantasy you've made up as a coping mechanism. And you thinking I blame the rich is also another fantasy you've completely created as a coping mechanism.
Because rich people should NOT be taxed more. You just tried to use it as a justification for taxing the poor, a real piece of shite move. Nobody should be taxed on income, rich or poor. The IRS should not exist.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Only two that can win. Dummy.
Only one can win. Dummy.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
False dilemma.
Wrong. Don’t use phrases you don’t understand. Makes you look silly. If you don’t vote for Rogers it helps Al -Sayed.
That absolutely is a false dilemma or false dichotomy
quote:
If you don’t vote for Rogers it helps Al -Sayed.
This is not true. A vote for a third party helps neither.
But what you are advocating for is a continuation of shitting candidates that will in no way represent the people. They are placed in a position by a higher authority to serve them.
It is the reason why Thune can do what he does with no reprecussions

Popular
Back to top


2





