
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Claiming Nuke Strike Imminent
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:10 am to Knocksville
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:10 am to Knocksville
A little over a year ago and most of the orange worshippers on here would have gone nuts if you had suggested Trump would start a war with Iran soon.
Never underestimate the idiocy of our government.
Never underestimate the idiocy of our government.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:12 am to KLSU
quote:
Yea I’m sure Trump is feeding his this information personally as Tucker has been such a great supporter.
He’s extremely close with JD who has also been against the war with Iran since Day 1
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:35 am to Knocksville
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:42 am to AUCom96
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:44 am to msutiger
Posted on 11/2/26 at 5:46 am to AUCom96
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:09 am to Knocksville
Cucker is a rabble rousers. Trump already stated no nukes. Cucker is trying to affect the election
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:10 am to cajunangelle
The woke right needs to be marginalized and silenced.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:25 am to Knocksville
Yep, it be like our pal Barook Hussein Obama's conciliatory policy towards Iran is finally coming to fruition.
Not sure a nuke could penetrate 300 ft of granite in that Pickaxe Mountain.
All I know, a nuke armed Iran is definitely NOT a good thing.
Not sure a nuke could penetrate 300 ft of granite in that Pickaxe Mountain.
All I know, a nuke armed Iran is definitely NOT a good thing.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 6:30 am
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:28 am to Zgeo
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:28 am to Knocksville
Tucker works for Qatar.
Qatar is in its 3rd day moderating the negotiations to end the US-Iran conflict

Qatar is in its 3rd day moderating the negotiations to end the US-Iran conflict

Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:35 am to cadillacattack
Van is hopping mad el-sayed used Tucker Carlson in a campaign ad....
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:36 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Who says sanctions aren't working?
The lack of a negotiated peace deal on US/Israeli terms or any push by the Iranians to pursue a deal.
quote:
Have you seen the state of Iran's economy? Do you think that's sustainable?
I don’t think the current status quo is sustainable for most parties.
The west can’t sustain without shipping and energy transiting the strait unopposed.
Africa and elsewhere face potential famine if fertilizer availability remains under required thresholds for crops.
Iran cannot sustain indefinitely absent Chinese economic aid without being able to export.
Trump is quite possibly about to see the midterms go blue in part because of gas prices.
It’s exactly what the Israelis want which is Iran engaged and sent into chaos in a way which doesn’t harm Israel militarily or economically which is absolutely worth noting as it points in a circumstantial way as to who is truly driving the engagement based on who is currently benefitting.
So no, none of it is really sustainable but it’s unsustainable in a way that’s pretty universal outside of one belligerent party.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 6:37 am
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:40 am to Knocksville
What the hell is the matter with him these days?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:45 am to cajunangelle
The same can be said for “Iran is this close to a nuclear weapon” that’s been said for 35+ years now. Trump basically tweeted D-day to Iran on Easter, but I guess congrats to Nathan on his most liked tweet ever.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we all agree that a nuke would be insane, right?
Very much so. I'm very anti-nuclear weapons in general, so I'm biased, but anyone who supports a first-strike nuclear attack is off-the-rails crazy. The repercussions of that would be hard to fathom.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 7:18 am to Rip Torner
quote:
Nuclear weapons are designed to explode above the surface to direct energy downward instead of being absorbed into the Earth and like wouldn’t damage anything at that depth. Lol they don’t create a 400 foot deep crater
Nuclear Bunker-Buster Options
• B61-11: An existing tactical nuclear gravity bomb with a specialized earth-penetrating metal case designed to burrow into soil and rock before detonation.
• B61-13: A newer, high-yield gravity bomb variant introduced to provide options against harder and larger-area targets, paving the way for phasing out older high-yield legacy weapons.
• B83-1: A high-yield (1.2-megaton) strategic thermonuclear gravity bomb historically serving heavy-yield bunker-busting roles, though slated for gradual retirement.
• Next-Generation Systems: The U.S. Congress and Air Force have allocated funding (such as $57 million in recent defense budgets) to study and prototype new nuclear weapon delivery systems and concepts aimed at defeating hard and deeply buried targets.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 7:20 am to Knocksville
Twenty years ago that guy was a solid contributor to political discourse. What the hell happened to him?

Popular
Back to top


2














