Started By
Message

Trump's letter tells Congress Iran hostilities 'terminated'

Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:13 pm
quote:

 The conflict involving Iran reached the 60-day mark Friday, and the Trump administration argues it has effectively ended due to a fragile ceasefire that began in April — meaning congressional approval is no longer required


quote:

Trump dismissed the idea of seeking congressional approval.

“It’s never been sought before — there’s been many, many times and nobody’s ever gotten it before. They consider it totally unconstitutional,” Trump told reporters at the White House.


quote:

House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed that stance, telling NBC News the U.S. is “not at war” with Iran because there is no “active, kinetic military bombing, firing or anything like that.”

news4sanantonio
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36748 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:15 pm to
Nope.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82332 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:20 pm to
It's pretty quiet over there.

Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Nope.


Obama did the same thing for the same reason.

quote:

quote:
The legal debate has focused on the Resolutions 60-day clock, which directs the President—absent express Congressional authorization (or the applicability of other limited exceptions) and following an initial 48-hour reporting period—to remove United States Armed Forces within 60 days from “hostilities” or “situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances.”
But as virtually every lawyer recognizes, the operative term, “hostilities,” is an ambiguous standard, which is nowhere defined in the statute.

quote:
My predecessor Monroe Leigh and Defense Department General Counsel Martin Hoffmann responded that, as a general matter, the Executive Branch understands the term “to mean a situation in which units of the U.S. armed forces are actively engaged in exchanges of fire with opposing units of hostile forces.

quote:
On the other hand, as Leigh and Hoffmann suggested, the term should not necessarily be read to include situations where the nature of the mission is limited (i.e., situations that do not “involve the full military engagements with which the Resolution is primarily concerned”); where the exposure of U.S. forces is limited (e.g., situations involving “sporadic military or paramilitary attacks on our armed forces stationed abroad,” in which the overall threat faced by our military is low and where the risk of escalation is therefore limited.
Subsequently, the Executive Branch has reiterated the distinction between full military encounters and more constrained operations, stating that “intermittent military engagements” do not require withdrawal of forces under the Resolutions 60-day rule.


quote:
the military means we are using are limited: This situation does not present the kind of “full military engagement with which the [War Powers] Resolution is primarily concerned.”




https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/167250.htm
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

It's pretty quiet over there.


We've recently hauled hundreds of tons of equipment over there and Iran is experiencing strange "gas leak" explosions.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
22953 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:27 pm to
Just wait until the IRGC can no longer communicate amongst their units.

It Will Be GLORIOUS!!
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36748 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:29 pm to
I misread you there and shot from the hip too quickly. I see what the intent is. Not that the thread title as stated can’t be misread/misinterpreted in a certain way, a certain bastardous way intended to mislead, by certain people. BUT this ain’t that, so my bad, dog. Damn, so this is what it feels like to be wrong, eh? Weird.
This post was edited on 5/2/26 at 6:16 am
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17962 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:30 pm to
Semantics.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
10851 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:33 pm to


I reserve any of my opinions until I hear from this thing.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:35 pm to
Don't sweat it brother. You save our asses here regularly.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:39 pm to
Dick Blumenthal is leaking generalities to the press from classified briefings. He says it's imminent.
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
5322 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

We've recently hauled hundreds of tons of equipment over there and Iran is experiencing strange "gas leak" explosions.


Link? Not doubting, just want to see who's reporting it.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 9:32 pm to
Tousi.

An American raised in tehran.

He has connections.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pfsqTHbGVQs

Google search:
quote:

The United States is conducting a massive logistical operation, recently delivering 6,500 tons of military equipment and munitions to Israel in a 24-hour period (April 2026). This includes, through at least two cargo ships and over 30 cargo planes, items like armored vehicles, trucks, and munitions, as part of an intensified effort involving hundreds of transport trucks.
This post was edited on 5/1/26 at 9:36 pm
Posted by TuDog
Boston
Member since Jun 2005
4540 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 9:38 pm to
Face of the Democrats and the panicans.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16390 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 5:23 am to
She's a super freak!
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24830 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:12 am to
quote:

The United States is conducting a massive logistical operation, recently delivering 6,500 tons of military equipment and munitions to Israel in a 24-hour period (April 2026). This includes, through at least two cargo ships and over 30 cargo planes, items like armored vehicles, trucks, and munitions, as part of an intensified effort involving hundreds of transport trucks.



Does he overlay that with any regular rotations on units anywhere in the region?

If there’s a rotation of deployments that will happen. Each unit moves their equipment into the AO overlaps a few weeks with the unit rotating out and then the unit rotating out loads up and goes home.

The freaking trains I’ve seen leaving Campbell with hundreds of rail cars of equipment makes me wonder if there’s not a better way.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10774 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:21 am to
No problem.

Iran has been in open violation of congressionally-approved sanctions for years.

The Biden administration did nothing to enforce the sanctions, in fact they looked the other way while the shadow fleet conducted BILLIONS in trade.

When you fail to enforce sanctions, they are meaningless.

Trump, Bessent, and Hegseth are enforcing congressional sanctions. It is really that simple.

This post was edited on 5/2/26 at 6:41 am
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19290 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:37 am to
Keeping equipment serviced in the field generally is tough so rotating equipment at same deployment time seems possible
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19290 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:38 am to
Sounds like a popular thing of Biden non enforcement policies in general
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36748 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:42 am to
Every single President since Iran turned into the problem it now is has given lip service to, or some useless “policy” that boiled down to that particular President putting some bandaid on it and basically kick the can down the road, and let it be some future President’s problem. All the while Iran was making incremental strides in certain areas in which let’s just say we don’t want them to. It were like a policy of weak policy.

Then a new Sheriff came riding into town, and he said to the townspeople, “Hold my beer.”
This post was edited on 5/2/26 at 6:44 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram