Started By
Message

re: Trump: ‘We’re Not Touching’ Social Security in Proposed Cuts to Government Spending

Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12330 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:35 pm to
Who cares? Only matters what actions are taken.

We have already learned not to pay attention to what the media says or what Trump says…

Posted by PineyWoodsHog
Darla Say Dictate Good
Member since Sep 2021
3070 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

SS shouldn't be touched. Pay roll taxes shouldn't go to anything except SS


Give me back what I've paid into it and I'll turn it into more, in the 17 years I have left before I'm eligible, than I'll get from the gubmint.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28579 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

As a person approaching 61 and working and putting money into it since I was 17 years old, I say frick you.

I want my muther fricking money.

Amen, brother.

I logged on to my SS account the other day to see the total amount that I've paid in and calculate what I reasonably expect to get out. I started paying in when I was 16. While I've done better with my 401K, that SS benefit is already purchased.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14812 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

As a 57 year old approaching those years I say: Raise it.


i agree, but best way to politically handle it is to heavily incentivise waiting longer to claim it.....IE a backdoor raising of the age...

Say you wait till 67/ or 68 and you dont pay taxes on it.....
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63365 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Trump: ‘We’re Not Touching’ Social Security in Proposed Cuts to Government Spending


Everything else is success theater.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
2658 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:54 pm to
62 in Feb., applied today.
An fyi to others approaching:
Make sure you have a certified copy of your birth certificate as you will need it when called in to your local office to verify.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63365 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

SS shouldn't be touched. Pay roll taxes shouldn't go to anything except SS.
So you’d end Medicare? Bold strategy Cotten!
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63365 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I was forced to pay into this system, I expect full repayment of my money , with interest.
Ir stopped being “your money” when the government took it. And the ROR would be considered negligent if the government were a CFP. It sucks. But people asked the to be dependent on the government. And this was the inevitable result.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:



As a 57 year old approaching those years I say: Raise it.


And means test.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63365 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

I just looked up 2022 numbers.

Pay roll tax revenue was 1.7 Trillion dollars.

Social security outlays were 1.2 Trillion dollars.

SS is more than self sustaining.
Is that all payroll tax? A big chunk goes to medicare and some to UE “insurance”. Even if that’s just SS, you need to do an NPV on the future payouts. Cash basis accounting won’t work here
Posted by Pfft
Member since Jul 2014
5082 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:02 pm to
Yup, I don't know which one is worse, big government or big business bribing big government to frick over the majority of the people.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26511 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:04 pm to
Just go with Milton Friedman's plan he created for Chile. You can leave your fund with the government plan or move it to a number of stock market that are regulated. Worked very well with much better returns.

The main complaint came from people who worked off the books and didn't pay in.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
10649 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:11 pm to
The headline might as well be "Trump: We're Not Interested in Balancing the Budget and Lowering the Federal Debt"

The only way to get the budget under control and lower the debt is to make cuts to Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, and Defense spending. Any unwillingness to seriously look at cuts/reforms in these areas is just kicking the can down the road.

You can't make enough cuts to the rest of government to have any effect. Making fed workers the boogey man is just throwing red meat to the base. He's not really serious about getting the budget under control.
Posted by Pfft
Member since Jul 2014
5082 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:14 pm to
Great day for you!
I did the math of starting at 62 or waiting until later. Total dollars for waiting does not catch up until you are almost 80 years old.

Will probably start at 63 or 64
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
38457 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

We’re Not Touching’ Social Security


Boooooooo

Slash and burn the Ponzi scheme yesterday.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26511 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:19 pm to
quote:


Great day for you!
I did the math of starting at 62 or waiting until later. Total dollars for waiting does not catch up until you are almost 80 years old.

Will probably start at 63 or 64


If you still earn money and you take it early, they take it back if you make more than squat.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
21737 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Welker said, “You won’t touch Medicare, Social Security?”

Trump said, “We are talking about Theft, abuse, fraud. I said, no, we’re not talking Social Security, other than we make it more efficient, but the people will get what they getting.”

Welker said, “So entitlements, off the table.”

Trump said, “And we’re not raising ages or any of that stuff.”

Intentional omission?
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
2439 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

As a 57 year old approaching those years I say: Raise it



Not sustainable at present. More going out than coming in. They should raise to 70.

Need to cut Defense spending as well.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3624 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:44 pm to
TDS is getting stronger with you
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63365 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

TDS is getting stronger with you
Huh? How does knowing the relative amounts of what makes up the budget = “TDS”? They could cut non DOD discretionary spending to $0 and only just barely balance the budget.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram