re: Trump: “The traitors that told the military to disobey my orders should be in jail”

quote:

---

It was several days back. But you are correct. I went and re-edited. It does match up with a video. Sorry for any confusion. I don’t remember where I got it. Probably some news hack that used AI to generate a transcription and AI took it upon him on herself to use interpretation. Sorry for any confusion.

---

No, you're all good... While RA found it easy enough, I had a very hard time locating the text and had zero desire to listen a thousand times to type the whole thing out.

Finding accurate info is tough, no harm no foul.

He took the bait. This will further feed the narrative that his orders were "illegal orders".

Did he have a choice to respond any other way? Probably not. But to the ignorant Left, this is going to come across as his "admission" that he is illegally ordering troops to oppress "American citizens".

It's bullshite, but you gotta give it to the Dim Establishment - they're really good at gaslighting their retarded sheep.

quote:

---

Thats the kind of emotional overreaction Democrats were looking for.

---

A statement of fact is only considered emotional overreaction to over emotional liberal women. Like you.

quote:

---

At least one Trump appointed judge agrees with you in the case of Portland.

---

Now do LA. And the appellate courts.

quote:

---

That is false.

---

You're right. But not for the reason you think. I spent the last half hour actually looking at the appellate record and he wasn't speaking in metaphor or even clever symbolism. He gave explicit instructions. Actual directives about real targets.

From the Second Circuit opinion in United States v. Rahman:

-He told one follower to “turn his rifle’s barrel to President Mubarak’s chest, and kill him.”

-He told another “Carry out this operation. Go ahead.” referring to the assassination plan.

-On a parishioner asking if he understood his instructions to bomb civilians “Yes, it’s a must, it’s a duty.”

-Another metaphor: “plan to destroy or bomb or inflict damage to the American Army.”

That is what a seditious conspiracy conviction looks like. People asking him for permission to kill specific people and bomb specific locations, and him giving them the green light.

Trying to compare that to “refuse illegal orders” is not serious and between this and your daycare analogy I'm starting to suspect you aren't a serious person. The PSA repeats the actual UCMJ requirement. It gives no target, no plan, no hidden meaning, and no operational approval of any kind. It does not tell anyone to refuse lawful orders, and unless you are ready to argue Trump gives illegal ones, there is no sedition angle to work with.

quote:

---

WHERE were these protectors of the military when Biden and his thugs were forcing them to take that unproven Covid shot, and persecuting those that would not?

Even after we knew they were wronged for certain WHERE WERE THEY to right the wrong?

---

Even Donald and crew didn't right the wrong on that. They offered them their jobs back only if they signed a statement that they were in no way coerced or pressured by the government to take the vaccine.

quote:

---

Actual directives about real targets.

From the Second Circuit opinion in United States v. Rahman:

-He told one follower to “turn his rifle’s barrel to President Mubarak’s chest, and kill him.”

-He told another “Carry out this operation. Go ahead.” referring to the assassination plan.

-On a parishioner asking if he understood his instructions to bomb civilians “Yes, it’s a must, it’s a duty.”

---

You insinuate you have a source. Link it.

quote:

---

A statement of fact is only considered emotional overreaction to over emotional liberal women. Like Trump

---

Fixed it for you buddy...

quote:

---

How can telling people to follow the law and Constitution be sedition?

---

When following military or CIA or FBI orders, who decides what is and isn't Constitutional.