- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump: “The traitors that told the military to disobey my orders should be in jail”
Posted on 11/23/25 at 1:27 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
Posted on 11/23/25 at 1:27 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
When following military or CIA or FBI orders, who decides what is and isn't Constitutional.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court
I don't know why y'all keep asking this
2
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:02 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I love it when communists use part of someone's analogy to fit their own narrative.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Ultimately, the Supreme Court
A typical lawyerly answer. Everything will be settled by the Supremes. You know with a little court packing in the future, everything will be determined by the courts and settled by the Supremes. Maybe they ought to rule in advance what are or are not legal orders. I can see this country is simply going to sh*it. I'm guessing whistleblowers and now conscientious objectors in the military will bring about the required cases to "test" this in the Gawd Almighty courts.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:20 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
HOLY SMOKES! BRUTAL moment as CBS stuns Rep. Jason Crow — who demanded the troops rebel against President Trump.
Even CBS called out the BS! x.com/RNCResearch/st…
“How do you respond to the allegations...from your colleagues, fellow veterans that what you put out there is weakening and corrosive?"
CROW: "They know better. We were very clear in the video that what we are talking about is unlawful orders."
“Specifically what?”
CROW: "Send troops into polling stations, kill terrorists' families."
“He hasn't done those things.”
They’re flailing.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:44 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
President Trump reposts, "Go get those traitorous sons of b*tches for sedition at the very least."
More virtue signaling.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/23/25 at 2:51 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:00 pm to HighStatus
quote:
What most people believe is that you should respect what the person wants to be called. Some shite that has ZERO impact on the lives of anyone is only a problem to people privileged enough to have time to worry about that shite.
So, on top of your other retardation, you're a misogynist that doesn't think women should have bathrooms, changing rooms, and school sports free from males? That the general public should be forced to validate a pervert's sexual fetish? Nice.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:09 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
If the president hasn't issued illegal orders, them members of Congress telling the military to defy the president is by definition illegal.
That is legit retard logic
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not entirely. It is reasonably clever, even if entirely duplicitous.
If the president hasn't issued illegal orders, them members of Congress telling the military to defy the president is by definition illegal.quote:
That is legit retard logic
If there WERE no illegal orders, and if Kelly, et al HAD advised military personnel to disobey his (definitionally legal) orders, they would arguably be violating section 2387 (at a minimum) by (to paraphrase that section) "inciting insubordination."
The problem with JD's "analysis" is that the Tweet did NOT advise military personnel to disregard LAWFUL orders, only unlawful ones. JD is changing the facts to support his narrative.
And if anyone thinks that this change was not intentional on JD's part, I have a lovely bridge to sell you ....
This post was edited on 11/23/25 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:27 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The problem with JD's "analysis" is that the Tweet did NOT advise military personnel to disregard LAWFUL orders, only unlawful ones. JD is changing the facts to support his narrative.
Which is why it's retard logic.
quote:
And if anyone thinks that this change was not intentional on JD's part, I have a lovely bridge to sell you ....
It's more flailing. They've dug in against lawful statements and lots of MAGA culture has made fools of themselves. They either just continue to dig in deeper until a new story takes over the news cycle or admit the foolishness of so many in the MAGA orbit. They've chosen the former.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
The insuation of that video is clear.
Keep parsing 4slowies.
Keep parsing 4slowies.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:31 pm to Jbird
quote:
The insuation of that video is clear.
Yes, ironically, the law and Constitution insulates the contents of that video from any government reprisal
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:33 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The implication of orders being unlawful are seditious.
Not in this case. A federal judge has already ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to DC violates federal law.
Oh, and in before "but, but it's a Biden judge..."
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not the point 4slowies.
They sent the message hoping a boasberg frick will rule guard usage etc is illegal.
They are without a doubt trying to split the military at the determent of the country simply for political points.
Another example Dems give not a single frick for the country.
They sent the message hoping a boasberg frick will rule guard usage etc is illegal.
They are without a doubt trying to split the military at the determent of the country simply for political points.
Another example Dems give not a single frick for the country.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:34 pm to BarberitosDawg
Your complete misuse of that meme is noted 
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:35 pm to Jbird
quote:
Another example Dems give not a single frick for the country.
It's so weird you argue this when they said to follow the law and Constitution
So not following the law and Constitution is caring for America now?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 3:39 pm to djsdawg
quote:You have not read 18 USC 2384, have you?
(The Tweet) simply said that members of the military should not follow unlawful ordersquote:
The implication of orders being unlawful are seditious.
Page 9 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News