- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump tax return decisions coming shortly SCOTUS 7-2, 7-2
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to SirWinston
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to SirWinston
quote:
On the bright side, one of overrated Tom Friedman’s stipulations for Biden to debate Trump will be met
And now he can legitimately claim the issue is subject to ongoing litigation and not something he can release as a condition to debate upon advice from his attorneys in that litigation.
0
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Can anyone explain to me why EVERY time the SCOTUS "gets it wrong" or is "politically 'cucked'" it just happens to be when they rule in opposition of one's preferred outcome?
That’s just your imagination.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to coozie
quote:
You guys seem to be forgetting the point: Trump is under a fishing expedition so they can have things to leak.
FIFY
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to MMauler
quote:
No, he's not.
He's under a politicized inquisition by far left whackjob Democrat operatives. These FILTHY F*CKING DIMS are on a fishing expedition to find political dirt on their opponent. And, that should not stand.
Remember, these are the same people who refuse to make the Clinton Crime Family Foundation reveal its donors EVEN THOUGH IT IS REQUIRED BY F*CKING LAW.
The GOOD NEWS is that both of these opinions just punt the final resolution 3-4 years down the road. By that time, Trump will be in 2-3 years into his second term and no one will care.
Relax, grandpa. Yes, Trump is under investigation. No, I'm not saying it's a fair or unbiased investigation.
Lmao, why is it that no one on this board can understand basic legal concepts?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:49 am to the808bass
quote:
For...
The perjured testimony of convicted felon Michael Cohen
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:50 am to SSpaniel
quote:You should NOT need to, if you would just listen to those who know more about these issues than you do.
Why should we, when we've go you here to Hanksplain them to us.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:51 am to AggieHank86
How's the practice going these days?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:51 am to the808bass
quote:
For...
You do realize you can google this, right? Like, all of the details of this case are right at your fingertips.
He's under investigation in Manhattan about whether or not the Trump organization falsified financial documents in order to hide hush money payments to two women Trump slept with before the election.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:52 am to TigerDoc
Umm... so the “ Touhy Regulations “are unconstitutional now? That’s not what the Supreme Court said in Touhy v. Ragen in 1951.
We have to amend the Privacy Act also?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:52 am to coozie
quote:
He's under investigation in Manhattan about whether or not the Trump organization falsified financial documents in order to hide hush money payments to two women Trump slept with before the election.
You gotta pay taxes on that?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:52 am to coozie
quote:I actually think that many of them COULD do so, if they were only willing to remove partisan blinders and TRY to be objective.
why is it that no one on this board can understand basic legal concepts?
But this is a political board, not a legal analysis board. Sound legal analysis is rejected here on a daily basis, where it conflicts with ideology.
This is a partisan pep rally, not a court of law. rah, rah, rah.
This post was edited on 7/9/20 at 9:55 am
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:55 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
By a senile dumb arse?.
We talking about Trump or Biden?
If you have to ask then we are talking about your senile dumb arse..
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:56 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
You gotta pay taxes on that?
I think the point is that falsifying financial documents with the intent to hide payments (to any party) is a federal crime. Don't think it's necessarily about taxes. But I guess yeah, maybe Stormy Daniels would have to pay taxes on that?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:57 am to coozie
And I wonder what will happen when those tax returns happen to "leak" to CNN or the New York Times.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You should NOT need to, if you would just listen to those who know more about these issues than you do.
But what if I don't like what they are saying? That means they are wrong, right?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:58 am to the808bass
quote:
And you didn’t plagiarize anything, I’m sure.
You're grasping at straws, just flinging baseless accusations of plagiarism. Have some pride, just take the L and walk away.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:58 am to coozie
quote:
He's under investigation in Manhattan about whether or not the Trump organization falsified financial documents in order to hide hush money payments to two women Trump slept with before the election.
So the Michael Cohen raid was not fruitful.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:59 am to wickowick
You can bet Creepy Joe Biden and his tax attorneys are scrubbing his Tax Returns right now.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:59 am to SSpaniel
quote:Here?quote:But what if I don't like what they are saying? That means they are wrong, right?
You should NOT need to, if you would just listen to those who know more about these issues than you do.
Yeah, pretty much does.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:00 am to RiseUpATL
quote:
They’ll attack things like that just to show that this filthy millionaire doesn’t pay his fair share of taxes, though he most likely does. You can’t really tell much more than that from a tax return. They are not at all representative of a persons over wealth and don’t tell the whole story on where income comes from.
That's all either of these cases are about; Digging to find something they can publicize that makes him look bad with zero underlying evidence.
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News