- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/9/20 at 1:04 pm to coozie
quote:
It's an investigation, relax. He hasn't been charged with anything.
After the Mueller debacle, that is easier said than done.
Wonder what ever happened to Hunter Biden's financial disclosure?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 1:08 pm to coozie
quote:Thoughts on Hillary smashing phones and deleting server data that were under subpoena?
This investigation is justified, but people here are more concerned about their partisan echo chamber.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 1:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
He was never charged with a conspiracy.
Basically only because under Justice Dept. guidelines, Trump can't be charged while in office. The facts and pleadings clearly indicated he was an unindicted co-conspirator. The whole point of the SCOTUS ruling today is that while you can't charge him, you can investigate him. Theoretically, a prosecutor can do all the leg work and be ready to file charges the day he leaves office.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 3:07 pm to wickowick
I’m not reading this whole thread but this really shouldn’t be a partisan issue, we need a clear ruling from SCOTUS on the extent Congress can subpoena personal information from a President, but I think it’s fair to punt this until after the election, just so long as we do eventually get a clear rule.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:03 pm to tmjones2
quote:
Maybe I'm just stupid but I genuinely don't understand what all the fuss is about if you're a Trump supporter.
Is there anything else to this beyond "I know he probably did something bad and I don't want him to get caught"?
Link where I was fussing?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:05 pm to Steadmans Cheddar
quote:
Basically only because under Justice Dept. guidelines, Trump can't be charged while in office. The facts and pleadings clearly indicated he was an unindicted co-conspirator. The whole point of the SCOTUS ruling today is that while you can't charge him, you can investigate him. Theoretically, a prosecutor can do all the leg work and be ready to file charges the day he leaves office.
Muh paying hot chicks to shut up!!! Investigate with Star Witness Cohen
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:08 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I’m not reading this whole thread but this really shouldn’t be a partisan issue, we need a clear ruling from SCOTUS on the extent Congress can subpoena personal information from a President, but I think it’s fair to punt this until after the election, just so long as we do eventually get a clear rule.
The problems are:
- it is partisan
- a clear rule will be selectively utilized
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:17 pm to teke184
quote:
How long until Biden’s financial documents are subpoenaed to look for transfers from his crackhead son to him?
SCOTUS and Roberts would rule the exact opposite if this case was heard tomorrow.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:47 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
It is partisan
Sure but it cuts both ways. A GOP House with a Dem as POTUS is a more likely scenario in the future anyway.
This post was edited on 7/9/20 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:50 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Sure but it cuts both ways. A GOP House with a Dem as POTUS is a more likely scenario in the future.
bullshite
The GOP has never investigated constantly on one farce after the other that had no basis in fact.
Clinton's impeachment was real.
Benghazi was real.
They barely moved on the tax scandal with lois lerner. They barely did anything on Fast and Furious. Both of those were more impeachable than that bullshite about the phone call.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:55 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
A GOP House with a Dem as POTUS is a more likely scenario in the future anyway.
Wut? When 2016?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 6:57 pm to Janky
quote:
Wut?
If you don’t realize the Dems have the advantage in the EC while the GOP has the advantage in the house then you don’t know that much about politics.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 7:00 pm to gthog61
quote:
bullshite
As usual you’re getting way too emotional.
We need a ruling from SCOTUS on what’s allowable when Congress decides to investigate POTUS. I have no problem punting until after Trump is no longer up for re-election.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 7:00 pm to Draconian Sanctions
K. See you November 4th. Don't be late.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 7:03 pm to Janky
Okay 
If you think I’m a Biden fan you don’t know shite
If you think I’m a Biden fan you don’t know shite
Posted on 7/9/20 at 10:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
If you think I’m a Biden fan you don’t know shite
That’s irrelevant since the rally cry of the left is Trump bad, and Biden’s not Trump. You will do as your told and vote Biden.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 11:16 pm to cajunangelle
President Trump tried to pretend to be upset about it but his body language would allow it. There’s nothing wrong with his taxes. He is dragging it out for maximal effect.
He is dragging it out for maximal effect.
Leftists are happy with the supreme court this time and it’s gonna be hard to invalidate other supreme court decisions and validate this one
He is dragging it out for maximal effect.
Leftists are happy with the supreme court this time and it’s gonna be hard to invalidate other supreme court decisions and validate this one
Posted on 7/9/20 at 11:40 pm to coozie
quote:
You're right! Thankfully, I don't have to hold the evidence to support this assertion. That evidence was already provided to the Manhattan DA when a subpoena was issued!
Thanks for admitting you don’t know anything about anything.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 11:43 pm to Steadmans Cheddar
Pretty sure it’s well understood any similar charges for campaign finance violations against Trump wouldn’t fly
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News