- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump tax return decisions coming shortly SCOTUS 7-2, 7-2
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:20 am to LSU5508
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:20 am to LSU5508
quote:
"The arguments here and in the Court of Appeals were limited to absolute immunity and heightened need. The Court of Appeals, however, has directed that the case may be returned to the District Court, where the President may raise further arguments as appropriate."
2
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:20 am to jatilen
quote:
so for Vance, this means that it will be tied up in court still?
quote:
Yes.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:20 am to gthog61
quote:So, it is me, Kav and Gorsuch interpreting the law exactly the same way ... versus numbnuts such as yourself who do not know the difference between a subpoena and a subway.quote:Well gee, your opinion is a fricking shocker
It is legally the right decision. All the reasons have been explained here for months.
But there will be great gnashing of teeth and rending of clothing on TDPT.
I can live with that.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:21 am to udtiger
quote:
Don't sweat it. This isn't over. It will never have wound its way through the courts by the election.
Good less ammo for our corrupt media
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:21 am to PhoenixLSUTiger
quote:
PhoenixLSUTiger
You. Are. Stupid.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:21 am to OchoDedos
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:21 am to AggieHank86
quote:
me, Kav and Gorsuch interpreting the law exactly the same way
You’re not interpreting shite. You’re reading blogs. Thanks for the post.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:21 am to OchoDedos
quote:
they punted
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:22 am to SirWinston
quote:Gorsuch & Kavananaugh riding dirty
frick Roberts
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:22 am to themunch
quote:
Again by Roberts, again 7-2: From the syllabus: "The courts below did not take adequate account of the signficant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President's information."
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:22 am to TigerDoc
Evidence of what?
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:23 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Trump lost
LINK
wow
come on CA. It doesn't appear he lost.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It is legally the right decision
Yup, now corrupt da’s can attack a president politically using the power of their office.
Of course republicans will take pride in remaining above the fray while the republic spins into chaos.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to wickowick
Roberts giveth...and Roberts taketh away...
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to SirWinston
quote:
Shut up, cuck
You guys know that Trump is going to get routed in November.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to the808bass
quote:I set forth the legal analysis on this case for y'all ... many months ago. This opinion confirms that I was correct.
You’re not interpreting shite. You’re reading blogs. Thanks for the post.
Come on, you can admit it.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to jatilen
quote:
More of a win for the president, it appears. The question presented, Roberts writes, is whether the subpoeans issued exceed the authority of the House under the Constitution.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to wickowick
a grand jury can see POTUS financials. that is different than Political hacks like Schiff.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to claremontrich
quote:
come on CA. It doesn't appear he lost.
Of course not.
This is the same sort of lie they want to run with his returns
Nobody will understand them so the media will say they say whatever the media wants them to say.
Posted on 7/9/20 at 9:24 am to themunch
Can anyone explain to me why EVERY time the SCOTUS "gets it wrong" or is "politically 'cucked'" it just happens to be when they rule in opposition of one's preferred outcome?
I cannot recall a single time when anyone posted "Well, SCOTUS sure fricked up that decision and they have no understanding...but, I am happy they are so stupid!"
I'm a process guy. This is the process.
I cannot recall a single time when anyone posted "Well, SCOTUS sure fricked up that decision and they have no understanding...but, I am happy they are so stupid!"
I'm a process guy. This is the process.
Page 3 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News