- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump tariffs blocked by US Court of International Trade
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:22 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:22 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The fentanyl issue was an out from previous trade agreements, not a justification for Constitutionality of the action.
We'll just have to agree to disagree. At 5:15 in the morning, I just went back to check the 2/3/25 White House BS declaration about the "dangers" from Canada.
Who believed that? Obviously not the 2/3rds Republican appointed panel yesterday.
1
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:26 am to The Egg
Goldman Sachs says this is a nothingburger. The Admin can sidestep.
Goldman on Tariff Judgment: Nothingburger
Goldman on Tariff Judgment: Nothingburger
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 5:26 am
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
If the courts tell us that we will have to depend on Congress to save us, then we are doomed. That place is a den of corruption whose only goal is to grift from the public treasury.
Amen. This court, and the people who support this ruling, do not have the USA’s best interest at heart. frick the court, frick the swamp, frick the deep state, frick the uniparty.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:39 am to Figgy
quote:
Mr. Trump
The fact that they do not refer to him as president Trump shows you the level of respect does not exist
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:02 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Irrelevant to the court case.
Who believed that? Obviously not the 2/3rds Republican appointed panel yesterday.
What is relevant is the "panel" ignored both precedent and law in issuing its finding.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:11 am to NC_Tigah
You have to excuse Ivory. He believes every president before Trump used all the right statutes and employed thousands of Constitutional scholars to painstakingly go through all of their proposals to make sure there wasn’t the slightest hint of impropriety before moving forward with an executive order.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:24 am to The Egg
Timing for this is curious. Comes out just when the EU was about to fold.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:36 am to WestSideTiger
That's a pretty good video.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:03 am to The Egg
quote:
Trump tariffs blocked by US Court of International Trade
Based.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:14 am to Seldom Seen
Why has the US court of international trade EVER ruled on the unfair practices of other countries? If they can deny tariffs, why didnt they put in tariffs at any time over the past decades?
I know because they dont have the authority.....just like they dont have the authority to take them off...
I know because they dont have the authority.....just like they dont have the authority to take them off...
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:41 am to trinidadtiger
Because this was the goal. It (predictably) backfired.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 5/29/25 at 12:04 pm to The Egg
Page 9 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News