Started By
Message

re: Trump tariffs blocked by US Court of International Trade

Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by WestSideTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4934 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:24 pm to
Napolitano Talked about this a couple weeks ago.


Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6012 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:28 pm to
No, they don’t have that authority regardless of what the fake lawyers exclaim
Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
2033 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:37 pm to
ROFLMAO

Ignore
Posted by FoTownBam
Foley Al
Member since Oct 2023
4214 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:38 pm to
Is this the first thing that this “court” has ever ruled on, because I’ve never heard of them.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7335 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:41 pm to
I’m sorry do people think it’s an “international court”? With jurisdiction outside the US or something?

It’s a US (federal) court, which has as much authority as any court. Unless this is appealed and overturned, Trumps trade war is effectively over.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6012 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:49 pm to
I am very familiar with the court and the Judicial Branch doesn’t have the authority to strike down every decision they disagree with. That’s not a thing just because you agree with it
Posted by TTOWN RONMON
Member since Oct 2023
1568 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Its not one of those fake courts like the international criminal court. It's an actual US court that Congress established under article 3. They absolutely had legitimate jurisdiction on this.



Yes it is, this was set up by Congress to try and thwart any President who does what Trump is doing, the Congress has NO POWER over the Executive Branch. He should ignore them, and if needed declare Marshall Law on these corrupt Judges who are trying to subvert the will of the people.

Its one BIG CROOKED CABAL.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7335 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:53 pm to
It appears you’re wrong, despite your familiarity. But it’ll be appealed and ultimately scotus will decide so we’ll see.

My prediction: the actual justifiable tariffs related to things like national security will hold. The 10% sweeping tariffs are doneso.

Should be a great day for the market tmrw. To the moon!
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted by mtheob17
Charleston, SC
Member since Sep 2009
5493 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:55 pm to
Where have they been on all the unfair trade practices around the globe over the last 20 years? Maybe they should investigate China which pushed us to where we are now.
Posted by theronswanson
House built with my hands
Member since Feb 2012
3209 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Where have they been on all the unfair trade practices around the globe over the last 20 years? Maybe they should investigate China which pushed us to where we are now.


That’s something Congress should have passed and the President should have signed into law. Letting the executive branch dictate tariff policy is not how our country works and is antithetical to the Constitution. How is levying a tariff on Canada or Australia advancing our national security?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9213 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

No, they don’t have that authority regardless of what the fake lawyers exclaim


It really is amusing to watch some of y'all chime in on something you don't understand. Some of us warned that the BS about Fentanyl could only be stretched so far to justify an "emergency" under the IEEPA necessary to allow the President (instead of Congress) to impose taxes, including tariffs.

This was an uncontroversial ruling. It's a shame that the President doesn't get better legal advice.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6012 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:06 pm to
I’m wrong because a court overstepped its authority?
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5669 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

This was an uncontroversial ruling. It's a shame that the President doesn't get better legal advice.


You run what you brung at the track. Let’s see how this “uncontroversial” works out. I think it will end up similar to your spelling. Good luck.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7335 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:09 pm to
You’re wrong because they didn’t overstep their authority.

But again, it’s getting appealed obviously, so we’ll see what happens!

Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9213 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Yes it is, this was set up by Congress to try and thwart any President who does what Trump is doing, the Congress has NO POWER over the Executive Branch. He should ignore them, and if needed declare Marshall Law on these corrupt Judges who are trying to subvert the will of the people.

Its one BIG CROOKED CABAL.


It's like watching dogs try calculus with some of y'all:)

The Court wasn't invented recently just to thwart Trump:

"The United States Court of International Trade (case citations: Ct. Int'l Trade) is a U.S. federal court that adjudicates civil actions arising out of U.S. customs and international trade laws. Seated in New York City, it exercises broad jurisdiction over most trade-related matters, and is permitted to hear and decide cases anywhere in the country, as well as abroad.

The court originated with the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, which established the Board of General Appraisers as a quasi-judicial entity of the U.S. Treasury Department tasked with hearing disputes primarily concerning tariffs and import duties.[3] In 1926, Congress replaced the Board with the United States Customs Court, an administrative tribunal with greater judicial functions, which in 1930 was made independent of the Treasury Department. In 1956, the U.S. Customs Court was reconstituted by Congress as an Article III tribunal, giving it the status and privileges of a federal court. The Customs Courts Act of 1980 established the U.S. Court of International Trade in its current form, granting it jurisdiction over all trade matters and conferring its judges with life tenure."
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100830 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:10 pm to
Welp this is not good for Trump.


This means no new trade deals will be formed since he has no tariff threat. Countries will continue to take advantage of us and Congress will sit on their hands and do nothing.

Another major L for Trump admin. They’re really piling up lately
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:12 pm to
If you think the executive has been overreaching for years now, you should love this ruling.

Take your anger out on Congress, they haven’t been a functioning legislative body in decades.
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 8:17 pm
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
14988 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Welp this is not good for Trump.


This means no new trade deals will be formed since he has no tariff threat. Countries will continue to take advantage of us and Congress will sit on their hands and do nothing.

Another major L for Trump admin. They’re really piling up lately


The money board loves this.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5669 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

The court originated with the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, which established the Board of General Appraisers as a quasi-judicial entity of the U.S. Treasury Department tasked with hearing disputes primarily concerning tariffs and import duties.[3] In 1926, Congress replaced the Board with the United States Customs Court, an administrative tribunal with greater judicial functions, which in 1930 was made independent of the Treasury Department. In 1956, the U.S. Customs Court was reconstituted by Congress as an Article III tribunal, giving it the status and privileges of a federal court. The Customs Courts Act of 1980 established the U.S. Court of International Trade in its current form, granting it jurisdiction over all trade matters and conferring its judges with life tenure."


That is sweet and all, but who enforces their rulings? I will give you a guess.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
17756 posts
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:19 pm to
No standing
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram