- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:28 pm to AuburnTigers
No, they don’t have that authority regardless of what the fake lawyers exclaim
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:38 pm to The Egg
Is this the first thing that this “court” has ever ruled on, because I’ve never heard of them.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:41 pm to Rip Torn
I’m sorry do people think it’s an “international court”? With jurisdiction outside the US or something?
It’s a US (federal) court, which has as much authority as any court. Unless this is appealed and overturned, Trumps trade war is effectively over.
It’s a US (federal) court, which has as much authority as any court. Unless this is appealed and overturned, Trumps trade war is effectively over.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:49 pm to mwade91383
I am very familiar with the court and the Judicial Branch doesn’t have the authority to strike down every decision they disagree with. That’s not a thing just because you agree with it
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:53 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Its not one of those fake courts like the international criminal court. It's an actual US court that Congress established under article 3. They absolutely had legitimate jurisdiction on this.
Yes it is, this was set up by Congress to try and thwart any President who does what Trump is doing, the Congress has NO POWER over the Executive Branch. He should ignore them, and if needed declare Marshall Law on these corrupt Judges who are trying to subvert the will of the people.
Its one BIG CROOKED CABAL.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:53 pm to Rip Torn
It appears you’re wrong, despite your familiarity. But it’ll be appealed and ultimately scotus will decide so we’ll see.
My prediction: the actual justifiable tariffs related to things like national security will hold. The 10% sweeping tariffs are doneso.
Should be a great day for the market tmrw. To the moon!
My prediction: the actual justifiable tariffs related to things like national security will hold. The 10% sweeping tariffs are doneso.
Should be a great day for the market tmrw. To the moon!
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:55 pm to The Egg
Where have they been on all the unfair trade practices around the globe over the last 20 years? Maybe they should investigate China which pushed us to where we are now.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:59 pm to mtheob17
quote:
Where have they been on all the unfair trade practices around the globe over the last 20 years? Maybe they should investigate China which pushed us to where we are now.
That’s something Congress should have passed and the President should have signed into law. Letting the executive branch dictate tariff policy is not how our country works and is antithetical to the Constitution. How is levying a tariff on Canada or Australia advancing our national security?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:59 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
No, they don’t have that authority regardless of what the fake lawyers exclaim
It really is amusing to watch some of y'all chime in on something you don't understand. Some of us warned that the BS about Fentanyl could only be stretched so far to justify an "emergency" under the IEEPA necessary to allow the President (instead of Congress) to impose taxes, including tariffs.
This was an uncontroversial ruling. It's a shame that the President doesn't get better legal advice.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:06 pm to mwade91383
I’m wrong because a court overstepped its authority?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This was an uncontroversial ruling. It's a shame that the President doesn't get better legal advice.
You run what you brung at the track. Let’s see how this “uncontroversial” works out. I think it will end up similar to your spelling. Good luck.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:09 pm to Rip Torn
You’re wrong because they didn’t overstep their authority.
But again, it’s getting appealed obviously, so we’ll see what happens!
But again, it’s getting appealed obviously, so we’ll see what happens!
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:09 pm to TTOWN RONMON
quote:
Yes it is, this was set up by Congress to try and thwart any President who does what Trump is doing, the Congress has NO POWER over the Executive Branch. He should ignore them, and if needed declare Marshall Law on these corrupt Judges who are trying to subvert the will of the people.
Its one BIG CROOKED CABAL.
It's like watching dogs try calculus with some of y'all:)
The Court wasn't invented recently just to thwart Trump:
"The United States Court of International Trade (case citations: Ct. Int'l Trade) is a U.S. federal court that adjudicates civil actions arising out of U.S. customs and international trade laws. Seated in New York City, it exercises broad jurisdiction over most trade-related matters, and is permitted to hear and decide cases anywhere in the country, as well as abroad.
The court originated with the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, which established the Board of General Appraisers as a quasi-judicial entity of the U.S. Treasury Department tasked with hearing disputes primarily concerning tariffs and import duties.[3] In 1926, Congress replaced the Board with the United States Customs Court, an administrative tribunal with greater judicial functions, which in 1930 was made independent of the Treasury Department. In 1956, the U.S. Customs Court was reconstituted by Congress as an Article III tribunal, giving it the status and privileges of a federal court. The Customs Courts Act of 1980 established the U.S. Court of International Trade in its current form, granting it jurisdiction over all trade matters and conferring its judges with life tenure."
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:10 pm to The Egg
Welp this is not good for Trump.
This means no new trade deals will be formed since he has no tariff threat. Countries will continue to take advantage of us and Congress will sit on their hands and do nothing.
Another major L for Trump admin. They’re really piling up lately
This means no new trade deals will be formed since he has no tariff threat. Countries will continue to take advantage of us and Congress will sit on their hands and do nothing.
Another major L for Trump admin. They’re really piling up lately
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:12 pm to The Egg
If you think the executive has been overreaching for years now, you should love this ruling.
Take your anger out on Congress, they haven’t been a functioning legislative body in decades.
Take your anger out on Congress, they haven’t been a functioning legislative body in decades.
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:14 pm to deltaland
quote:
Welp this is not good for Trump.
This means no new trade deals will be formed since he has no tariff threat. Countries will continue to take advantage of us and Congress will sit on their hands and do nothing.
Another major L for Trump admin. They’re really piling up lately
The money board loves this.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The court originated with the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, which established the Board of General Appraisers as a quasi-judicial entity of the U.S. Treasury Department tasked with hearing disputes primarily concerning tariffs and import duties.[3] In 1926, Congress replaced the Board with the United States Customs Court, an administrative tribunal with greater judicial functions, which in 1930 was made independent of the Treasury Department. In 1956, the U.S. Customs Court was reconstituted by Congress as an Article III tribunal, giving it the status and privileges of a federal court. The Customs Courts Act of 1980 established the U.S. Court of International Trade in its current form, granting it jurisdiction over all trade matters and conferring its judges with life tenure."
That is sweet and all, but who enforces their rulings? I will give you a guess.
Back to top


1




