Started By
Message

re: Trump secures historic deal with Greenland and Denmark...

Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:02 pm to
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
43496 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

But none of that is in the deal that we know of as of yet. It’s just a security deal.


Not only do you not know this, but it contradicts what Trump just said about it. For frick's sake, stop being a re-tard.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12582 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

NATO members didn’t and don’t let us use joint bases for Iran operations. So there’s no reason to think they would give us unfettered use of a base on Greenland.


They have no power over the US. Hegseth is calling for a NATO 3.0

https://nypost.com/2026/07/11/opinion/europe-is-stepping-up-to-fortify-nato-3-0-and-we-must-too/
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15999 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:02 pm to
Sorry but I’ll believe Trump over any article or news report
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4304 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:03 pm to
Can someone explain what’s different here?

Were China and Russia establishing bases in Greenland?

US already had bases there.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 6:04 pm
Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
3256 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Doing everything except fixing the actual problems with this country.


If the actual problem was fixed… you wouldn’t be around to see it ;)



Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13672 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:07 pm to
How many US military bases do we have in Greenland right now?

Is it just the one?
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 6:08 pm
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
52106 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:08 pm to
Good deal.

I want Iceland more, though.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16570 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:09 pm to

I wouldn't be opposed to pulling entirely out of all bases that aren't in our hemisphere, with Japan being the exception.

Now that several of the Central and South American countries are having a Renaissance and resurgence of sorts, it's time to build "fortress America" and focus trade and defense on the North and South American continents exclusively. Canada will have to be brought to heel in this plan, but thats doable.

Between the two continents, every resource whether human or natural is aplenty. Shutting out the rest of the world and guaranteeing our own survival should be paramount now more than ever.
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
2770 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:09 pm to
Trump is connected to reality about as much as McConnell is.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4304 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:09 pm to
Yes, Pituffik (formerly Thule).

There are apparently a couple of “strategic sites” we want to revitalize.

Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
5314 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Not only do you not know this, but it contradicts what Trump just said about it. For frick's sake, stop being a re-tard.


Nah dude don’t let Trump keep jozzing on your face.

If it includes a mineral deal, great. If not it’s just a deal that says we get to pay to defend Denmark’s territory.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
25082 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Wasn’t this kind of de facto the case already? Seems like they’re just trying to reach for any win right now.

Do you really think Trump wanted a 51st state?

No, he wanted access to the minerals and to ensure we could keep anyone we don’t like out of the western hemisphere, that island is incredibly strategically important from a naval standpoint.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
43496 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

How many US military bases do we have in Greenland right now?


This is about much more than just military bases.

Trump says that the deal grants the US the security rights, but also "all other needs" that the US has with Greenland. They haven't been shy about what they want out of Greenland. This is going to be about oil and rare Earths as well. Which is a huge deal.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12582 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:


Sorry but I’ll believe Trump over any article or news report


Me too. I posted it for the news that Hegseth said we need a NATO 3.0 and I believe it will happen.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

I figured they were already locked out. Due to NATO, and we have a history of bases on Greenland including at least one currently.


I’m not going to pretend that I knew the details of the arrangement to have bases in Greenland prior to this deal, but there are other countries that are typically in alliance with the U.S. that allowed for Chinese and Russian assets, if not bases, in their territory.

Panama is an example, and so are many 3rd world nations where China initiated Belt and Road projects, or where Communist politicians took control.

With the EU being so openly anti-American, in fact if not in word, long before Trump became president, it was questionable whether Denmark might allow incursions of Russian or Chinese “companies” or communication networks, or “refueling access” in Greenland.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
100576 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:13 pm to
So we own greenland now

Orange just keeps winning
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
43496 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Nah dude don’t let Trump keep jozzing on your face.



For frick's sake, read something, dipshit.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


I believe I'll take Trump at his word on this before some random retard on the internet who has no clue and is just looking, yet again, for a reason to be outraged by the things Trump does. People like you are thoroughly frickin' broken.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31369 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

De facto isn’t as rock solid as ink on paper


How does it differ from the agreement that has been in place for 75 years? That is the real measure of the new deal.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27755 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:23 pm to
I'm happy to see it, could have done without all the drama.
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3505 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:26 pm to
This is in writing, and from how it reads the US can expand its presence while prohibiting adversarial countries from investing there. As the Article Ocean opens up more and more, Greenland gains strategic importance since it sits along the corridor between the Arctic Ocean and North Atlantic. For example ships and subs from Russia need to pass it to get to the US from the north.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram