re: Trump says those who want to talk about "Epstein hoax" are "stupid people"

quote:

---

It’s almost getting sad at this point

---

It’s sad alright. Because he ain’t wrong.

Ok, I guess I should’ve simplified it to …..


You have no idea what you’re doing or talking about if you think any of those three questions could be answered with a yes or no.

quote:

---

explained to you in simple terms why I’m not going to say a simple “yes” or a simple “no” to any of those questions, because only a fool would think satisfactory.

---

What is complex about Donald Trumps claims? It’s quite straightforward


Feel free to write your novel about Trumps 1000 character Truth social post.

Imagine voting for a pedophile - good luck with your life.

quote:

---

That's the liberals fantasy. What the rest of us who are critical of Trump on this matter think is DT is just doing the "establishment" thing and covering for a powerful something - like the CIA or Mossad, for example.

---

It’s common knowledge it was an intel op. It’s been outlined in detail all over the internet.

Benny Johnson ran a podcast the other day where Epstein admitted it.

The FL prosecutor on the state case was told flat out he was an intel asset which is why that case got dropped.

The issue isn’t just that the deep state trafficked poor American girls to get raped all over the world.

It’s that they got caught red handed, killed off the guy, destroyed the evidence and Trump who ran on cleaning all of this mess up is now telling his base we’re crazy people for even mentioning all the evidence and demanding accountability with exactly zero deep state people indicted for any of their myriad of crimes and corruption.

When you’ve lost Steve Bannon and and General Flynn you’ve truly lost the plot.

Unfortunately all we can do is speculate as to why and hope someone gets him back on track because his response to this is legitimately derailing his entire 2nd term and we haven’t even hit midterms.

I started out as respectful as it can get on this forum with you, then what did you do? You made an unsolicited comment about me eating dog shite. Neither have I acted in any arrogant manner involving myself declaring intellectual superiority over you or anyone else. In fact, that originated with YOU being offensive towards me simply being verbose in many of my responses. Did I eventually respond in kind to your insults towards me, O guess I’m guilty as charged on that. Ironically, I do fault myself for responding in kind at all, I try not to do it. If I’m confident in a response, I typically would see no need for snark on my part.

Which brings me to the issue of an answer to your questions/challenges at all: It’s become crystal clear to me that you probably aren’t what I’m looking for in a debate partner. And I can’t imagine anyone taking that as some sort of acknowledgment that I don’t have any answer(s). I don’t think anyone would accuse me of lacking an answer or response at any time, if I choose to do so of course.

So I guess come back with another insult of some sort.

quote:

---

You made an unsolicited comment about me eating dog shite.

---

No. I said you sniff your own farts



That was after multiple responses failing to respond to the actual question.
Also after you said this

quote:

---

That’s either a sadly ill conceived thought, or it’s a lie. Either way, it’s not helping your case for being correct about anything at all, in my view anyway. When you say something like that it only makes me feel more justified in discounting your assertions and statements.

---

But you were oh so respectful and not seething with condescension the whole time

quote:

---

I started out as respectful as it can get on this forum with you, then what did you do? You made an unsolicited comment about me eating dog shite. Neither have I acted in any arrogant manner involving myself declaring intellectual superiority over you or anyone else. In fact, that originated with YOU being offensive towards me simply being verbose in many of my responses. Did I eventually respond in kind to your insults towards me, O guess I’m guilty as charged on that. Ironically, I do fault myself for responding in kind at all, I try not to do it. If I’m confident in a response, I typically would see no need for snark on my part.

Which brings me to the issue of an answer to your questions/challenges at all: It’s become crystal clear to me that you probably aren’t what I’m looking for in a debate partner. And I can’t imagine anyone taking that as some sort of acknowledgment that I don’t have any answer(s). I don’t think anyone would accuse me of lacking an answer or response at any time, if I choose to do so of course.

So I guess come back with another insult of some sort.

---

Still can’t rebut it.




This is what you always do. Filibuster and obfuscate.


Can never address the issue.

Well he's stupid then for talking about releasing the files and applauding dumbass Bondi for attention-whoring the whole thing and getting people all focused on it. If he had never mentioned it and she had never done that, people wouldn't even be talking about it right now like this. And he keeps talking, making it bigger.

A lot of MAGA are the ones that are the most pissed about it.

quote:

---

Still insisting on being offensive towards me I see. Even after I tried to taper down the debate and donate you a win. I guess you insist on forcing the issue. Look, you can look at my history. There is an endless supply of rebuttal and addressing of issues and non-obfuscation. And with people that have a much brighter disposition than you. I have no issues in most instances. So don’t take any future lack of response to you as a lack of ability and thoughts to rebut. Take it as I don’t believe you’re a worthy opponent. Both style and substance.

---

I told you write your novel. David_DJS asked you to write your novel. It was obvious to him you ignored filibustered and obfuscated.



You can’t bear to call Trump a liar but also think to highly of yourself to present a dumb argument thus you have to ignore the subject.