- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump says that federal workers who don't want to work in the office will be fired
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:27 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:27 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Make the government lean, efficient and based on merit
And once it's there, we can talk about WFH and accommodating the work-life needs of good federal employees IMO.
Just like in the private sector, if you can manage WFH employees, you will ultimately have more profits due to eliminating the need for commercial real estate.
2
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:29 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Just like in the private sector, if you can manage WFH employees, you will ultimately have more profits due to eliminating the need for commercial real estate.
Don't bring logic into this thread. The people bitching about WFH are the same ones who tell cops "I pay your salary"
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:30 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
How’s this going to play out with that deal being signed? The article I read yesterday on it, from a left wing side, made it sound like Trump couldn’t do anything about it.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:31 pm to TheCheshireHog
I doubt he can.
The AFGE is stupid powerful. That behemoth needs dismantled.
The AFGE is stupid powerful. That behemoth needs dismantled.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:32 pm to LNCHBOX
Less than 3% of jobs in the market even offer hybrid schedules to date. I am not a fan of a hybrid or work from home schedule. I think there is a loss of congruency and synergy within the work culture and dynamic as a result of "absence". Particularly within the C-suite level.
Personally, my home is my refuge and not a space for the energy that is derived from work.
Personally, my home is my refuge and not a space for the energy that is derived from work.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:33 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
if you can manage WFH employees
That's the issue with federal employees; you can't get rid of them. Certainly not like you can in the private sector.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:42 pm to Flats
Also the percentage of gov employees is actually smaller than it was in 1970 relative to population and has remained steady.
It's not the employees. It's the outrageous budgets that Congress oversees. They have a spending problem. Getting rid of employees will not change that.
The spending under Trump last time was just as bad. They are making you take your eye off the ball.
It's not the employees. It's the outrageous budgets that Congress oversees. They have a spending problem. Getting rid of employees will not change that.
The spending under Trump last time was just as bad. They are making you take your eye off the ball.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:44 pm to LNCHBOX
Most work from home telework jobs require at least 2 days a pay period in the office; unless a reasonable accommodation if could be permanent.
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:45 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
The spending under Trump last time was just as bad.
Yeah, I know.
I thought we were talking about government employees working from home.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:27 pm to Flats
quote:
That's the issue with federal employees; you can't get rid of them.
This is a bigger issue than WFH. If you have useless workers WFH, they will be just as useless in an office. And they will cost more.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:33 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
My counter to this is that everyone on here is saying these are "cake jobs". If the job is really as good as people think then going back in will not make these people quit. It has to be one or the other.
Whether they are cake or not is irrelevant. Many of them are unnecessary and thus need to be eliminated. This will hopefully cause many of them to quit or be fired.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Ian Jaeger
This dude may be the worst of the copy/paste hacks.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
See how reports. Those that do not report, simply do not fire them, eliminate the position they occupy, give severance and say bye.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:47 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
LegendInMyMind
Why are you always hating people on X who have a significant following? Your name "LegendInMyMind" is perfect for you. A nobody criticizing someone that has 221k followers.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:50 pm to John Barron
Because, John, all they do is rip off people with actual sources and retards like you eat it up. You're too stupid to see a problem with that, though, boy.
He's a "body builder" and "political commentator" who does absolutely nothing. He doesn't even provide "commentary", you dolt!
quote:
someone that has 221k followers.
He's a "body builder" and "political commentator" who does absolutely nothing. He doesn't even provide "commentary", you dolt!
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:51 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
This is a bigger issue than WFH.
Sure it is, but it’s still a big part of WFH. I was responding to a post about managing employees. If you have a marginal employee, is he easier to manage when he’s at home or when he’s down the hall?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:53 pm to John Barron
quote:
A nobody criticizing someone that has 221k followers
Worth on life does not equate to number of followers. Exhibit A, the Kardashians. You've got some growing up to do.
Also, mist of us realize they post BS to get views. They are not legit sources. They just want the money.
It will make sense to you someday.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:54 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Also, mist of us realize they post BS to get views. They are not legit sources. They just want the money.
Like the Charlie Kirk fan account that many here have been fooled by?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:55 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Because, John, all they do is rip off people with actual sources
I don't even follow this guy. But you don't get 221k followers without producing content people like. So why do you care so much? It just comes off as you being a jealous prick.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:57 pm to John Barron
For the love of all that is good and kind, John, PLEASE go be stupid somewhere else.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News