Started By
Message

re: Trump Pardons Tina Peters

Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:19 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476446 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I think he hates nefarious government prosecutions and political prisoners.


What does that have to do with Tina Peters?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476446 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Would / should Tina Peters be in jail serving a 9 year sentence if the data showed vote flipping and clear election fraud?


You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.

Her violations were based in a claim of defense of a coverup, so any nullification of her criminality should be focused exclusively there.

*ETA: this is why the Rosa Parks example is retarded.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:21 am
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5110 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

isn't she jailed on state charges?


Yes, and the POTUS should order all Federal money going into the Colorado Government to be halted until she is free.

She is in jail for exposing truth.

There should be a whole bunch of folks in Maricopa County in Arizona who should be finding lawyers and contacting the Feds and cutting deals.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476446 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

She is in jail for exposing truth.


What, exactly, did she expose?

Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13521 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

The ones crying are the ones supporting criminals, ITT


The ones crying about it are you and all the usual TDS f@gs who REEEE here daily about OMB because OMB pardoned a political prisoner.

Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5372 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

But can we acknowledge she clearly broke the law?

It looks like it. Just like the vast majority of people that get pardoned
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75080 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Yes, and the POTUS should order all Federal money going into the Colorado Government to be halted until she is free.

That would be an interesting decision.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62961 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.



I asked you a question. You are sidestepping it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476446 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I asked you a question. You are sidestepping it.

Within my comment is the answer.

I just guided you to a better question that may not be a "No"
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62961 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Within my comment is the answer.



No you didn't.

I asked a straightforward question. You responded:

quote:

You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.



I wasn't making an argument. And, I wasn't asking you to comment o what would be needed to make an argument.

quote:

Her violations were based in a claim of defense of a coverup, so any nullification of her criminality should be focused exclusively there.



Again. I wasn't referencing the legal defense she attempted and didn't ask you to opine on that.

quote:


*ETA: this is why the Rosa Parks example is retarded.


I didn't mention Rosa Parks.

I asked a direct question in response to your post that pointed out that her data did not show election fraud or tampering.

Are you afraid to answer it?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42176 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

But can we acknowledge she clearly broke the law?


Debatable. She was trying to preserve the data per her duties in her position. Technically she did break "a law", but she would have broken another law by letting them destroy it.

Why did they want to destroy the data so bad?
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:44 am
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13521 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:


quote:
She is in jail for exposing truth.


What, exactly, did she expose?



Shut the frick up, you TDS bitch.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21880 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Come on SF, Trump had trials too. I’m not arguing whether the woman is guilty of said ‘crime’, I’m arguing for a FULL exposition of the Evidence of vote tampering which lies underneath her choice to risk conviction because of her dedication to having the WHOLE TRUTH aired.

Do you serve Truth, or the Law? One must choose their basic “First Principle “. That is the bottom line.

When Law - in whatever form- does not serve Truth, is said Law just, virtuous or even practical?

Will, should or can it stand as a a basic civil principle for societal survival and prosperity? I think not, as our agreement and ‘implied social contract “ deteriorates by the day.


This.

RCDFan1950 has the correct view in this thread. This and a couple other similar posts of his.



Unfortunately the Constitution and the law are not on Tina / Trump’s side.

But in this case the corrupt CO state politicians have used the CO state law to prosecute Tina in order to silence her and hide a larger crime.

Thus we have a Constitutional and moral crisis.


He is bringing attention to her plight.

The election theft will all come out in the coming months and corrupt CO politicians will be charged and tried and political pressure will lead to Tina’s release.

Hopefully something can be done in the meantime to get her into federal custody to protect her as a witness and better treat her health issues.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:58 am
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

here you are insisting she remain unjustly incarcerated.
Good Lord. That is not remotely what he said.

He said that the president of the United States did not have constitutional authority departing individual for convictions on state crimes.

Accepting reality is not remotely the same as liking it.

Personally, I am glad that she is in jail. She undisputably broke the law, and she is sitting exactly where she should be sitting.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44204 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:56 am to
quote:

so her shutting off security cameras, breaking into secure voting rooms/machines with a guy with fake credentials and trying to shop that info to pillow guy isn't rigged, politically motivated?


Now do Watergate…
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

YES! I’m going through this right now. When we’re overwhelmed and/or overextended our brains search for familiar problems to ruminate about or “fix.” Social media feuds are not new to Erika so it’s almost like visiting an old friend instead of having to make sense of her new reality or try to solve her new, enormous problems. My psychologist friend calls it “mental masturbation.” Getting stimulation and dopamine without any risks or growth or progress.


Thanks! I had been re-thinking my own obsession with being right on this board from the Biblical perspective of Matthew (speck of sawdust/plank in own eye). I'm going to resolve to participate less in fishing with dynamite issues (duh, President can't pardon state offenses) and stick to fact finding threads (why are they lying about pipe bomber?).

Cheers
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

quote:

You're paid to post here on behalf of Democrats
i'd love to see your (((proof))) of this surely you're not just a loon making shite up
Ed does not like to burden his arguments with facts.

For the most part, he just replaces them with emotional cursing.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 10:34 am
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

so her shutting off security cameras, breaking into secure voting rooms/machines with a guy with fake credentials and trying to shop that info to pillow guy isn't rigged, politically motivated?
quote:

Now do Watergate…

That too was a crime, and the perps went to jail.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44204 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Now do Watergate…


quote:

That too was a crime, and the perps went to jail.


Mark Felt served time?
Who knew?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42176 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Do you serve Truth, or the Law? One must choose their basic “First Principle “. That is the bottom line.


This ^^

Plus
No one wants to answer why they wanted to destroy the data so bad.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram