- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Pardons Tina Peters
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:19 am to BTROleMisser
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:19 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
I think he hates nefarious government prosecutions and political prisoners.
What does that have to do with Tina Peters?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:20 am to moneyg
quote:
Would / should Tina Peters be in jail serving a 9 year sentence if the data showed vote flipping and clear election fraud?
You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.
Her violations were based in a claim of defense of a coverup, so any nullification of her criminality should be focused exclusively there.
*ETA: this is why the Rosa Parks example is retarded.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:21 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:22 am to beaux duke
quote:
isn't she jailed on state charges?
Yes, and the POTUS should order all Federal money going into the Colorado Government to be halted until she is free.
She is in jail for exposing truth.
There should be a whole bunch of folks in Maricopa County in Arizona who should be finding lawyers and contacting the Feds and cutting deals.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:22 am to riccoar
quote:
She is in jail for exposing truth.
What, exactly, did she expose?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The ones crying are the ones supporting criminals, ITT
The ones crying about it are you and all the usual TDS f@gs who REEEE here daily about OMB because OMB pardoned a political prisoner.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
But can we acknowledge she clearly broke the law?
It looks like it. Just like the vast majority of people that get pardoned
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:27 am to riccoar
quote:
Yes, and the POTUS should order all Federal money going into the Colorado Government to be halted until she is free.
That would be an interesting decision.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.
I asked you a question. You are sidestepping it.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:32 am to moneyg
quote:
I asked you a question. You are sidestepping it.
Within my comment is the answer.
I just guided you to a better question that may not be a "No"
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Within my comment is the answer.
No you didn't.
I asked a straightforward question. You responded:
quote:
You would probably need to show the active coverup/threats to make that argument, more than what was contained within the data itself.
I wasn't making an argument. And, I wasn't asking you to comment o what would be needed to make an argument.
quote:
Her violations were based in a claim of defense of a coverup, so any nullification of her criminality should be focused exclusively there.
Again. I wasn't referencing the legal defense she attempted and didn't ask you to opine on that.
quote:
*ETA: this is why the Rosa Parks example is retarded.
I didn't mention Rosa Parks.
I asked a direct question in response to your post that pointed out that her data did not show election fraud or tampering.
Are you afraid to answer it?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:42 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
But can we acknowledge she clearly broke the law?
Debatable. She was trying to preserve the data per her duties in her position. Technically she did break "a law", but she would have broken another law by letting them destroy it.
Why did they want to destroy the data so bad?
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:44 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
She is in jail for exposing truth.
What, exactly, did she expose?
Shut the frick up, you TDS bitch.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:52 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
Come on SF, Trump had trials too. I’m not arguing whether the woman is guilty of said ‘crime’, I’m arguing for a FULL exposition of the Evidence of vote tampering which lies underneath her choice to risk conviction because of her dedication to having the WHOLE TRUTH aired.
Do you serve Truth, or the Law? One must choose their basic “First Principle “. That is the bottom line.
When Law - in whatever form- does not serve Truth, is said Law just, virtuous or even practical?
Will, should or can it stand as a a basic civil principle for societal survival and prosperity? I think not, as our agreement and ‘implied social contract “ deteriorates by the day.
This.
RCDFan1950 has the correct view in this thread. This and a couple other similar posts of his.
Unfortunately the Constitution and the law are not on Tina / Trump’s side.
But in this case the corrupt CO state politicians have used the CO state law to prosecute Tina in order to silence her and hide a larger crime.
Thus we have a Constitutional and moral crisis.
He is bringing attention to her plight.
The election theft will all come out in the coming months and corrupt CO politicians will be charged and tried and political pressure will lead to Tina’s release.
Hopefully something can be done in the meantime to get her into federal custody to protect her as a witness and better treat her health issues.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:58 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:54 am to Dex Morgan
quote:Good Lord. That is not remotely what he said.
here you are insisting she remain unjustly incarcerated.
He said that the president of the United States did not have constitutional authority departing individual for convictions on state crimes.
Accepting reality is not remotely the same as liking it.
Personally, I am glad that she is in jail. She undisputably broke the law, and she is sitting exactly where she should be sitting.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:56 am to beaux duke
quote:
so her shutting off security cameras, breaking into secure voting rooms/machines with a guy with fake credentials and trying to shop that info to pillow guy isn't rigged, politically motivated?
Now do Watergate…
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:08 am to 4cubbies
quote:
YES! I’m going through this right now. When we’re overwhelmed and/or overextended our brains search for familiar problems to ruminate about or “fix.” Social media feuds are not new to Erika so it’s almost like visiting an old friend instead of having to make sense of her new reality or try to solve her new, enormous problems. My psychologist friend calls it “mental masturbation.” Getting stimulation and dopamine without any risks or growth or progress.
Thanks! I had been re-thinking my own obsession with being right on this board from the Biblical perspective of Matthew (speck of sawdust/plank in own eye). I'm going to resolve to participate less in fishing with dynamite issues (duh, President can't pardon state offenses) and stick to fact finding threads (why are they lying about pipe bomber?).
Cheers
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:08 am to beaux duke
quote:Ed does not like to burden his arguments with facts.quote:i'd love to see your (((proof))) of this surely you're not just a loon making shite up
You're paid to post here on behalf of Democrats
For the most part, he just replaces them with emotional cursing.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 10:34 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:10 am to jimmy the leg
quote:That too was a crime, and the perps went to jail.
so her shutting off security cameras, breaking into secure voting rooms/machines with a guy with fake credentials and trying to shop that info to pillow guy isn't rigged, politically motivated?quote:
Now do Watergate…
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:21 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Now do Watergate…
quote:
That too was a crime, and the perps went to jail.
Mark Felt served time?
Who knew?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:24 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
Do you serve Truth, or the Law? One must choose their basic “First Principle “. That is the bottom line.
This ^^
Plus
No one wants to answer why they wanted to destroy the data so bad.
Popular
Back to top



0



