- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Moves to Overturn Manhattan Conviction, Citing Immunity Decision
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
What will be stripped away from facts as inadmissable?
Gonna be fun
Gonna be fun
0
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you want to try to argue the payments to Cohen were official Executive/Presidential actions? Feel free.
Your whole trial is rigged with corruption.
It and you are humorous to me
Do you want to argue my facts?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s not Trump’s burden to prove entitlement to the immunity. The prosecution must rebut the high presumption that President Trump’s actions are entitled to immunity.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:08 pm to Riverside
quote:
The prosecution must rebut the high presumption that President Trump’s actions are entitled to immunity.
And that will be easy to do
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
You've had a hard week. Take L...
Trump is going to win on appeal.
Trump is going to win on appeal.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:10 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Paying off a hooked to protect his reputation doesn't smell quite the same.
So if a fella comes in to your town or church and says he is going to tell everyone you frigged 3 of his sheep unless you pay him $10, you are telling me it is against the law to write your lawyer a check for legal expenses to protect your reputation?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Cool. That will require motion practice and a new trial, minimally.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can't wait to read the briefs discussing how corporate payments for a "hush money" settlement were official acts of the President of the US.
They probably weren't related to campaign finance laws either.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:13 pm to BCreed1
quote:
You've had a hard week.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:14 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
They probably weren't related to campaign finance laws either.
Theoretically? No.
We don't know if campaign finance law had anything to do with his conviction (and the fact that we don't is the strongest argument for a re-trial, FWIW)
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:14 pm to Timeoday
quote:
So if a fella comes in to your town or church and says he is going to tell everyone you frigged 3 of his sheep unless you pay him $10, you are telling me it is against the law to write your lawyer a check for legal expenses to protect your reputation?
Naw, I believe Trump was wrongly convicted in crimes that shouldn't be illegal.
I'm saying paying off a hooker with hush money to protect your reputation isn't an official act as President.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We don't know if campaign finance law had anything to do with his conviction
Except for the jury instructions where the judge said that a campaign finance law violation could be the predicate crime.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:15 pm to stout
Ehhh that's a stretch. Seems pretty cut and dry to me that actions related ti thus were in a personal setting. SCOTUS made clear that doing a thing while president doesn't make the thing an official act.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:15 pm to TigerFanatic99
Pretty sure that isn't the argument.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:17 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I'm saying paying off a hooker with hush money to protect your reputation isn't an official act as President.
The entire defense of the payments is built around it being a valid corporate expense due to reputation affecting the value of the company.
I want to hear how anything related to Trump Corp was part of the Executive
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:18 pm to Riverside
quote:
Except for the jury instructions where the judge said that a campaign finance law violation could be the predicate crime.
That doesn't refute what I said. At all.
I never argued that possibility was precluded.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
lol you’re so dumb. You’re saying he paid her off in benefit of his company, not political reputation?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:19 pm to stout
"Long shot" is an understatement
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:21 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Ordering the prideboys to hang Mike Pence because he believed it was necessary to enforce election security, sure.
Good Lord
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Prosecutor Steinglass: They committed FECA violations Trump's lawyer Blanche: Objection Justice Merchan: Overruled. Prosecutor: This was a campaign contribution, that's why it was made... The defendant already announced he was going to run for President again.
quote:
Prosecutor; You don't have to agree on which crime, the Judge will tell you. All roads lead to former President Donald Trump. You the jury can hold him accountable. Very soon it will be time to go deliberate and then come back in here and say Guilty, 34 times.
LINK
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News