
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump Media Ban Sounds Like It Will Get Paused by Court
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:40 pm
At today's hearing, the Trump-appointed judge said that it looked like the ban didn't allow the media companies to contest Trump's decision. Seems like just a speed bump that can be easily cured.
Reuters - Due Process Concerns in Media Ban
quote:
Kelly said that two precedents from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit make clear that journalists are entitled to due process before their White House press passes can be revoked. The judge added that it did not appear that the White House had given the three news outlets a meaningful opportunity to contest the revocation of ?their access.
Reuters - Due Process Concerns in Media Ban
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
So... they have a vested property right to a press pass?
That's what these courts are stating.
Jesus Tapdancing Christ! Apparently anyone can get a fricking law degree now.
That's what these courts are stating.
Jesus Tapdancing Christ! Apparently anyone can get a fricking law degree now.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:43 pm to IvoryBillMatt
sooo should that judge be allowed to restrict cameras/media from his court room
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:43 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Trump had to know because the same thing happened to him in 2018. There's a process to remove the press. He just doesn't want to do it that way.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:45 pm to udtiger
You’d be well advised to avoid your attempts at amateur legal analysis…
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
If they get them back, sit them in the back row and do not call on them.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:46 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Trump had to know because the same thing happened to him in 2018. There's a process to remove the press. He just doesn't want to do it that way.
Because he shouldn't have to.
If I invite someone into my home and then decide they have to leave because I don't want them there, I don't have to give them "due process." They are their at my invitation which is subject to recall at my whim. To state otherwise is to say they have a vested right to be in my house once I let them in.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:47 pm to VOR
quote:
You’d be well advised to avoid your attempts at amateur legal analysis…
I'll put my Westlaw history up against yours any day.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:48 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Where in the fck was our due process during the 2020 stolen election???
All I remember is, “NO STANDING”
They can fck right off.
All I remember is, “NO STANDING”
They can fck right off.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:49 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Trump Media Ban Sounds Like It Will Get Paused by Court
Between the courts, the Democrats, and the Thune/McConnell sellouts it's a wonder President Trump can do anything at all.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:49 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Trump had to know because the same thing happened to him in 2018. There's a process to remove the press. He just doesn't want to do it that way.
Yes. This isn't an earth-shattering decision from a leftist judge. It's pretty standard...and easily corrected by the Trump Administration if they want to follow through.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:49 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
There's a process to remove the press. He just doesn't want to do it that way.
While true, that still doesn't minimize the audacity of a court telling the POTUS he can't control who and who does not come into the fricking White House without providing "due process."
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:54 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
While true, that still doesn't minimize the audacity of a court telling the POTUS he can't control who and who does not come into the fricking White House without providing "due process."
Just remember this when the dems follow suit in the future by trying ousts OAN, Fox, Newsmax and whoever else.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:54 pm to Jesterea
quote:
It’s not his house.
It's not CNN's either.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:56 pm to Jesterea
quote:
It’s not his house.
So if I lease an apartment, I have no control over my invitees?
Does this mean anyone has the right to stroll in and mill about the place? I mean, the WH is open to the public for tours.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:00 pm to Jesterea
quote:
Just remember this when the dems follow suit in the future by trying ousts OAN, Fox, Newsmax and whoever else.
You're mistaking me for a populist who wants it one way for his side but the other way for the other side.
If the next Democratic POTUS wants to limit who can cover the nude male hormone grown titties he or she has invited to party on the WH lawn, that's his/her prerogative.
As to the asinine, "It's not his house" nonsense, you're a taxpayer, right?
Why don't you stroll right up there to the WH gate and demand access? It's YOUR house, after, all, right?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:02 pm to udtiger
It is amazing how utterly retarded the Judiciary has become
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Why is everyone so up in arms about kicking media outlets out of the White House?
At this point in Trump’s presidency, is he really swaying anyone’s vote? If you don’t like CNN or MSNBC, just don’t watch them.
At this point in Trump’s presidency, is he really swaying anyone’s vote? If you don’t like CNN or MSNBC, just don’t watch them.

Popular
Back to top

19











