- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump mandates all EPA data to be reviewed prior to release
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:26 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:26 pm to joshnorris14
Exactly. He just doesn't want them releasing a bunch of politically motivated bullshite in the meantime.
FYI, I am someone that absolutely believes in Global Warming.
I just don't get my panties in a bunch about something clearly logical.
FYI, I am someone that absolutely believes in Global Warming.
I just don't get my panties in a bunch about something clearly logical.
1
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:26 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Associated Press ?@AP BREAKING: Trump administration mandating EPA scientific studies, data undergo review by political staff before public release.
If this is true, every single one of you frickers should be afraid, very afraid. It's one thing to want to quell scientific or media bias but only Trump approved information is a recipe for absolute disaster.
This makes me WABA, Want America Back Again.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:26 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Sure. I think Obama probably agreed with most of it anyway, but I'm not aware of any similar rule under his administration requiring WH political staff to approve data.
You think the EPA was just releasing shite left and right that wasn't approved by Obama.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This is so freaking inane. They are part of the EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
They exist and get their authority from an Act. Not from Trump. Don't be a fricking retard.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:28 pm to joshnorris14
Few realize this Josh. It's a long, long term objective, but it has started.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:28 pm to Canard Noir
quote:
If this is true, every single one of you frickers should be afraid, very afraid.
Why?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:28 pm to Canard Noir
quote:
If this is true, every single one of you frickers should be afraid, very afraid.
We should be afraid of a boss telling his employees not to release things without his approval?
Ok.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:29 pm to bmy
quote:
They exist and get their authority from an Act. Not from Trump. Don't be a fricking retard.
And their boss is....
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:29 pm to Fun Bunch
scientific research, especially that funded by the government, should be freely available to the community.
if a group takes issues with any findings, they are free to refute them using facts, observations, and logic.
that's how the science thing works.
restricting this process is wholly unethical and detrimental to the advancement of society.
if a group takes issues with any findings, they are free to refute them using facts, observations, and logic.
that's how the science thing works.
restricting this process is wholly unethical and detrimental to the advancement of society.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:29 pm to NIH
Its amazing how quickly "conservatives" bow down to the executive branch after a Republican is in office.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:29 pm to bmy
quote:
They exist because of and get their authority from an Act.
Yes, it was via an EXECUTIVE ORDER of the then President.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:30 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We should be afraid of a boss telling his employees not to release things without his approval?
When what he's telling them to release is scientific data? Absolutely.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:30 pm to Iosh
quote:
I'm not aware of any similar rule under his administration requiring WH political staff to approve data.
What if the data that Trump's staff has is conflicting with what the EPA wants to release?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:30 pm to Fun Bunch
This board needs a remedial civics class.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:31 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We should be afraid of a boss telling his employees not to release things without his approval?
We're the boss.
This is taxpayer funded data.
What happened to transparency?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:32 pm to Salmon
quote:
We're the boss.
Nope, not of the EPA. The President is their ultimate boss.
Fortunately, WE are still HIS.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:33 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Nope, not of the EPA. The President is their ultimate boss.
Fortunately, WE are still HIS.
cool
so you agree with me
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:34 pm to MSMHater
quote:
So, in theory, the executive branch should have editing control of scientific data from one of its "appendages"? Are you guys hearing yourself?
Their managing supervisor, reviewer and BOSS is the Chief Executive. They work directly for the POTUS. They report to the POTUS.
They are NOT independent in any way. Congress originally had the authority and responsibility to carry out the missions of these agencies. Congress decided that it was too much trouble SO they delegated all rule-making responsibility and authority to these agencies that are in the Executive Branch. POTUS is the Boss of everything in the Executive Branch.
EPA and all of their snowflake liberal bureaucrat Democrats WILL NOW bend to the Will of the POTUS.
The decision is Unalterable, Final and Non-Negotiable. The End. Stop talking and get back to work.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:34 pm to Salmon
quote:
We're the boss.
This is taxpayer funded data.
What happened to transparency?
Went from drain the swamp to power grab just like that. Sad that short sidedness and partisanship makes DC exactly like it's always been.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:34 pm to Salmon
Sort of, but it still seems you have the chain of command fricked up.
Page 5 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News