- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump hater orders man to remove MAGA hat at mall in PA
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:14 pm to Dead End
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:14 pm to Dead End
quote:
That's the perfect quote to illustrate the mindset of a leftist. Your feels don't matter. Your feels don't make you safe. You'll make a great victim.
His feels don't mean shite regarding my rights.
I am too lazy to find the post you are replying to.
That a-hole can eat shite.
1
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:56 pm to gthog61
quote:
His feels don't mean shite regarding my rights.
Absolutely
quote:
I am too lazy to find the post you are replying to.
It's not worth your time.
quote:
That a-hole can eat shite.
Absolutely!
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:11 pm to MetArl15
quote:
Locked and loaded in a mall is trashy and unnecessary. So were the actions of the guy who assaulted him.
Westgate?
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:12 pm to texridder
quote:
You think it's just fine to kill someone who threatens to knock your hat off?
If some random guy starts physically contacting me in the middle of a public space, you're damn right I am going to react. That's not a sane thing to do.
Like how am I supposed to know he or she only wants knock my hat off? It is an irrational act.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:22 pm to MetArl15
quote:
Locked and loaded in a mall is trashy and unnecessary.
How do know it was not necessary? Trash? Sounds like you belong in England. A place where self defence can land you behind bars.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
How that idiot thinks the gun coming it exacerbated it is beyond logic
It is only beyond your logic.
What happens if the other guy has a gun too?
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:37 pm to texridder
quote:
What happens if the other guy has a gun too?
Since he initiated the fight, his pulling a gun would have probably qualified the man he attacked in shooting him. You see, oh little ignorant one, SYG laws don't protect the one who initiates a violent encounter.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:49 pm to Clames
quote:
Since he initiated the fight, his pulling a gun would have probably qualified the man he attacked in shooting him. You see, oh little ignorant one, SYG laws don't protect the one who initiates a violent encounter.
Swing and a miss.
The discussion was about the fact that pulling a gun escalates the situation.
Try again.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:23 am to texridder
quote:
What happens if the other guy has a gun too?
Then the Trump supporter that's being attacked is lucky to have a gun to defend himself against a criminal with a gun.
Do you not realize you just made a great argument on why to carry a gun?
Swing and a miss, douche.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:44 am to Dead End
quote:
Then the Trump supporter that's being attacked is lucky to have a gun to defend himself against a criminal with a gun.
Do you not realize you just made a great argument on why to carry a gun?
Can you read, dimwit? The post is about whether the MAGA guy pulling his gun exacerbated the situation.
Try harder next time.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 4:25 am to texridder
quote:
The discussion was about the fact that pulling a gun escalates the situation.
Well.... Did it? Did escalation happen or deescalation happen? Also, what did the authorities conclude?
Don’t answer with your feels and what if’s. What happened?
Posted on 1/11/20 at 4:35 am to texridder
quote:
The post is about whether the MAGA guy pulling his gun exacerbated the situation.
Seems like the aggressor ran away scared when the gun was pulled. Thus the situation was de-esculated because the gun was introduced.
Strange.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 4:46 am to MetArl15
quote:
Why would assault charges follow a punch if they don’t follow brandishing a gun?
Your answer can be found by research of the statutes. Read all that covers this situation and report back. Be prepared to quote them.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 4:51 am to Crimson Wraith
Wonder if it was this hero. He is from/lives in PA and this was posted last week.
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 4:54 am
Posted on 1/11/20 at 5:03 am to MetArl15
quote:
Regardless, I don’t hate Trumpers, I just profoundly disagree with nearly everything he stands for, and I find the cult of personally surrounding him terrifying
So you disagree with a roaring economy, record low unemployment, the belief we should take a stance for America in foreign negotiations instead of immediate submission, the belief that foreign nationals need to use legal means to become citizens, a strong defense, the belief federal crimes should be prosecuted fairly regardless of affiliations, government is not the best steward of your money, federal law enforcement should be unbiased, foreign leaders shouldn’t have a role in dictating domestic policy, policies that have promoted wage growth among all incomes, stronger retirement accounts, etc. Good to know.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 5:03 am to stout
I don’t think a glock has a safety.
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 5:06 am
Posted on 1/11/20 at 5:08 am to 24nights
It doesn't. There was a thread about this dude's post on the OT
Posted on 1/11/20 at 5:22 am to MetArl15
quote:
I just believe it leads to more violence rather than inhibiting it. Studies have shown the same:
And you are the reasons that “studies” are performed. Let’s look at some more “studies”
-Thinking Can Make You Fat
U.K. Daily Telegram September 11, 2008 The Studies a??Glycemic Instability and Spontaneous Energy Intake: Association with Knowledge-Based Work,a?Psychosomatic Medicine, 2008
-Junk Food in Pregnancy Leaves Children Fat for Life
U.K. Daily Mirror July 1, 2008 The Studies a??Offspring from Mothers Fed a a??Junk Food' Diet in Pregnancy and Lactation Exhibit Exacerbated Adiposity That Is More Pronounced in Females,a? The Journal of Physiology, 2008
-Bacon Gives Kids Cancer
U.K. Daily Mirror January 31, 2009 The Studies a??Cured Meat, Vegetables, and Bean-Curd Foods in Relation to Childhood Acute Leukemia Risk: A Population Based Case-Control Study,a? BMC Cancer, 2009
Follow those groundbreaking studies with this:
LINK
quote:
'Real' fake research hoodwinks US journals October 5, 2018 by Ivan Couronne
Three US researchers have pulled off a sophisticated hoax by publishing fake research with ridiculous conclusions in sociology journals to expose what they see as ideological bias and a lack of rigorous vetting at these publications.
Seven of the 20 fake articles written by the trio were accepted by journals after being approved by peer-review committees tasked with checking the authors' research.
A faux study claiming that "Dog parks are Petri dishes for canine 'rape culture'" by one "Helen Wilson" was published in May in the journal Gender, Place and Culture.
The article suggests that training men like dogs could reduce cases of sexual abuse.
Faux research articles are not new: one of the most notable examples is physicist Alan Sokal, who in a 1996 article for a cultural studies journal wrote about cultural and philosophical issues concerning aspects of physics and math.
This time the fake research aims at mocking weak vetting of articles on hot-button social issues such as gender, race and sexuality.
The authors, writing under pseudonyms, intended to prove that academics in these fields are ready to embrace any thesis, no matter how outrageous, so long as it contributes to denouncing domination by white men.
"Making absurd and horrible ideas sufficiently politically fashionable can get them validated at the highest level of academic grievance studies," said one of the authors, James Lindsay, in a video revealing the project.
Lindsay—that is his real name—obtained a doctorate in mathematics in 2010 from the University of Tennessee and has been fully dedicated to this project for a year and a half.
One of the published journal articles analyzes why a man masturbating while thinking of a woman without her consent commits a sexual assault.
Another is a feminist rewrite of a chapter of "Mein Kampf."
Some articles—such as a study of the impact of the use of an anal dildo by heterosexual men on their transphobia —even claimed to rely on data such as interviews, which could have been verified by the journal gatekeepers.
For that "study" the authors claimed to have interviewed 13 men. In the dog article, the authors claimed to have examined the genitals of nearly 10,000 canines.
"If our project shows anything, it shows that what's coming out of these disciplines cannot currently be trusted," Lindsay told AFP.
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 5:33 am
Posted on 1/11/20 at 9:08 am to Crimson Wraith
He should've fricked with their heads and wore an Obama shirt and a MAGA hat.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 9:10 am to texridder
quote:
It is only beyond your logic.
What happens if the other guy has a gun too
LOL @ you thinking you just made a point.
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News