Started By
Message

re: Trump fans confused how their investments in his crypto/Stock are now worth a Fraction

Posted on 7/7/26 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
56739 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Trump didnt take advantage of anyone.

If a businessman did it then I would agree with you. If a religious leader, a politician with a big following, or some similarly situated celebrity does it, it is taking advantage of their gullible followers. It’s one of the ugly things about Trump. We have to take the graft and the grift if we want the tilting against the deep state.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38432 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I’m still trying to get a feel for where crypto gets its value. As far as I can tell, it was supposed to be just a privately owned/funded medium of exchange outside the eyes and ears of the government. Of course, the same can be said of “points” in a trade association — yet another pain in the arse that I was fortunately never lured into. Same can be said for timeshares and pleasure boats.

At the end of the day, crypto seems like chain letter, pyramid, or Amway/MaryKay type deal where there’s no real value to the base product/service.
I’m not endorsing or knocking crypto as an investment, but the theory behind its value is basically scarcity plus confidence.

Bitcoin, at least in theory, gets value from having a limited supply, being transferable without a bank, and having enough people trust it that it becomes liquid.

But that is also the problem. Its value depends almost entirely on continued belief in the system. If that belief holds, so does the coin. If confidence collapses so does it. So you are correct that it holds no intrinsic value.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140189 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

then proceed to make a billion and a half investing in them inside of a year, I'm not sure what anyone can counter with as far as Trump having become a brazen grifter in general.
Now see, that may be new information.

My impression was that there was no evidence that Trumpcoins have been unloaded by the Trump family, and they are way down from their highs. I think the company marketing them, which is a Trump holding in some proportion, made about $600 million on the initial offering. But I don't think there is anything out of the ordinary with that transaction in terms of other crypto offerings.

If the Trump family did unload massive amounts, accounting for the downturn, that would be very shady in my opinion. Do you have evidence that occurred?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14340 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

No, you could not possibly have come to this conclusion from what I stated.


Well, which part was I mistaken about?

See, if you deny that Trump is engaging in graft when he so obviously, blatantly, and unashamedly is, then it doesn't really matter much whether this was an example of it or not.

It's like the abortion supporter who tries to distract with incest and rape. She isn't any more against abortion purely for convenience sake than she is in the case of incest, but she throws out the incest to gaslight and to try to make the opposition look unreasonable.

So regardless of whether you said anything about it or not in the post in question, I'm asking you now: Do you deny that Trump is engaging in blatant graft?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14340 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

But I don't think there is anything out of the ordinary with that transaction in terms of other crypto offerings.


What's out of the ordinary is that Trump deregulated the industry while owning two companies that benefitted from the deregulation (that's what I meant by "investing" in them, not buying and selling coins), World Liberty Financial and CIC Digital LLC.

The first was created on September 16th, 2024 and the second was created on January 17th, 2025.

The "Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology EO" was signed on January 23rd, 2025, three days after Trump was inaugurated. That executive order declared crypto to be a national priority (after Trump himself had criticized it for years as a haven for dirty money) and set federal policy and instructed agencies to begin changing regulations and relaxing enforcement. Which obviously increased traffic and therefore business for his two crypto companies. Just like if he had created a bunch of weed dispensaries and then signed an EO making weed legal according to federal law.

Anybody who is not dishonest will admit that Trump used the office of the presidency of the United States to profit on this.

Nobody has brought it to bear before a court that I am aware of, and I don't know whether it technically violates the Emoluments Clauses or not.

I do know that it very obviously is exactly the type of thing that MAGA claims it is vehemently opposed to. Whether it's legal or not.

This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17415 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 1:49 pm to
The only other candidates (at least in my state) were one-off candidates with no chance of winning the election.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
15145 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:01 pm to
And you rejoice!!!!! YAY!!!! You got him this time!

Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
15145 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:


"Trump fans"

Those who felt the risk of crypto was worth voluntarily putting in their money?


Because there have been no risks associated, and no fluctuation in value, with other forms of crypto before this... apparently.
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
2530 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Bitcoin, at least in theory, gets value from having a limited supply, being transferable without a bank, and having enough people trust it that it becomes liquid. But that is also the problem. Its value depends almost entirely on continued belief in the system. If that belief holds, so does the coin. If confidence collapses so does it. So you are correct that it holds no intrinsic value.


One of the best explanations I’ve ever read, but I’m still left thinking “there’s nothing there”, which you do sort of confirm. It’s not like investing in Exxon because you know people need gas, or General Mills because you know people gotta eat, or Union Pacific because you know all these products need to move. Even Enron produced more utility, at least in theory.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140189 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

What's out of the ordinary is that Trump deregulated the industry while owning two companies that benefitted from the deregulation (that's what I meant by "investing" in them, not buying and selling coins), World Liberty Financial and CIC Digital LLC.
That's a fair point. I am generally for deregulation. I get your point though.

Congress could have passed legislation, and should have in this arena. Had it done so, I'm not sure it would've affected the transactions that you've noticed. But of course Congress is completely impotent in its present iteration, so it fell to the chief executive.

Unrelated, but since you mentioned it, I also think dispensaries should be legalized.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6477 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

We have to take the graft and the grift if we want the tilting against the deep state

Ummmm....
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42238 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Congress could have passed legislation, and should have in this arena. Had it done so, I'm not sure it would've affected the transactions that you've noticed. But of course Congress is completely impotent in its present iteration, so it fell to the chief executive.



Yes the same Chief Executive who established a new crypto firm three days before signing the EO

Are we prepared to just concede the point that Trump engaged in grift and double dealing or are we still in denial?
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
9800 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:23 pm to
And you were stupid enough to invest?

No wonder you are butt hurt over this.
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20963 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:32 pm to
Best ties around - Trump ties before he announced his run for President.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140189 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Are we prepared to just concede the point that Trump engaged in grift and double dealing or are we still in denial?
If by "we" you mean me, I guess I'm missing the "double dealing" precept here.

I just don't know enough of the details regarding the crypto offering, profits, etc. to come to the definitive conclusions you have. That isn't a MAGA thing.

For example, a while back, people were running on Paul Pelosi profiting on sales that seemed to coincide with a congressional bill. However, in detailing it out, I found that Pelosi's transaction actually involved long-term options he'd picked up a year before, and were due to expire when he cashed them. It left the whole thing far less nefarious than it superficially appeared.

Similarly Kelly Loeffler was accused of insider trading at the onset of Covid. The accusation was she sold a ton of stock just ahead of the covid market downturn. As it turns out, the transactions were carried out in a blind trust, and most of the "sales" were actually put option sales, which is a long play. From a financial standpoint it was incredibly stupid

In my own account, anticipating the market downturn with Covid closures, I had dumped a ton of stock. It didn't take Warren Buffett to figure out what the market was going to be doing for the next few months at that point. But apparently Kelly Loeffler's money manager missed that. It is what it is. But what it wasn't, was "insider trading."

But I just call them like I see them.
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89484 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

The only other candidates (at least in my state) were one-off candidates with no chance of winning the election.


So what?

They were on the ballot. If you were really against Kamala, nothing was stopping you from pulling the lever for one of them.
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 3:23 pm
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17869 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

I’m still trying to get a feel for where crypto gets its value.


You really want a subject to ponder? What makes that 20 in your wallet really, actually, worth 20 dollars?
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 3:26 pm
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17869 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

In my own account, anticipating the market downturn with Covid closures, I had dumped a ton of stock.


I bought a ton during the downturn. Mostly ETFs, but some in energy that was a gamble to make it through the lockdowns. Turned out to be a fantastic gamble. Some offshore stock bought at 60 something cents is now bumping 5 bucks a share.

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
66740 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Do you deny that Trump is engaging in blatant graft?


Yes, he definitely isn't.
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1897 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 4:00 pm to
then you're a fracking idiot!

your opinion therefore is worthless if you chose that clueless cackler over anyone


quote:

I voted against Trump not for Harris but, yes, that meant I had to pull the lever for her.
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 4:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram