- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/21/18 at 10:26 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
They are transsexuals.
And they have a serious metal disorder.
Thats like saying the guy who dresses up as Napoleon is Napoleon...and has a mental illness.
No. He just has a serious mental illness.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 10:43 am to 14&Counting
quote:
protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law.
I am not aware of any federal law which confers protected class status based on sexual orientation.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 10:50 am to ljhog
quote:
I am not aware of any federal law which confers protected class status based on sexual orientation.
Read the article first idiot
Posted on 10/21/18 at 11:02 am to 14&Counting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6jz2Jma5-s
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 11:06 am
Posted on 10/21/18 at 11:22 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:Dumbass, without definitions set by government there can literally be no laws at all.
I think you’re missing my point. The government shouldn’t “claim” anything. If government starts defining gender, they will define anything. You can’t claim to defend liberty if you aren’t consistent about it.
What is murder? It has a specific definition and varying degrees which are defined.
What is robbery versus burglary and are they mutually exclusive?
Laws contain definitions by default.
The consistency comes exactly from govt. setting established definitions.
Liberty? What is that without a definition?
Posted on 10/21/18 at 11:29 am to 14&Counting
quote:LOL!! Having sex, yes. That's a choice. *Unless Bill Clinton has his eye on you, then it's happening whether you like it or not.
recognizing sex largely as an individual’s choice
But being born with a hoyner or a hoohoo? That's not a choice. I'm not one to argue people who claim they were "born gay" because I'm not them, I don't know what's in their mind, and I could give a shite honestly. But biological birth gender isn't a fricking choice. It's how you were born.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 11:35 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Government should get out of people’s personal lives and shouldn’t define gender at all.
So you don't have a problem with a 30 year-old man exposing his junk in a bathroom that you're nine year-old daughter is in. Got it.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 11:41 am to Homesick Tiger
What about those with a micro penis?
Asking for a friend.
Asking for a friend.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:21 pm to 14&Counting
The folks that scream about multiple gender ID’s are the same people that scream “its science” when climate change is on the table.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:28 pm to Sidicous
quote:
Dumbass, without definitions set by government there can literally be no laws at all. What is murder? It has a specific definition and varying degrees which are defined. What is robbery versus burglary and are they mutually exclusive? Laws contain definitions by default. The consistency comes exactly from govt. setting established definitions. Liberty? What is that without a definition?
It’s called the first amendment. We don’t have the first amendment just so we can talk about the weather. That means that people can live very controversial lives or do things that you may not agree with. Of course we have laws - to ensure that people don’t get hurt. That is the only reason first amendment rights might be curtailed - if it hurts or defames others. But someone tucking their dick and wearing a wig doesn’t hurt you or affect you. Let them do what they want, of course with the stipulation that the taxpayer doesn’t fund it. Government defining gender is dangerous though. I would imagine you’d be pretty upset if someone told you how to live your life.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:29 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
quote:
If they can claim that some men are born with "female gendered brains", they can make it a "civil rights" issue, and a "medical condition" and force you to fund it with your tax dollars.
I think you’re missing my point. The government shouldn’t “claim” anything. If government starts defining gender, they will define anything. You can’t claim to defend liberty if you aren’t consistent about it.
Unfortunately we are infested with such a large number of the ignorant that we have to have definitions to everything, else people will be saying "You can't arrest me, I'm a tree."
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:30 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Government should get out of people’s personal lives and shouldn’t define gender at all. Let people be whoever or whatever they want as long as taxpayers aren’t funding it.
It's too many people thinking like you that's brought this confusion on society. I agree, let people be what they want to be but quit trying to force the sane portion of society to condone or normalize this type of behavior. These people people along with the LGBTQ...XYZ want normal folks to throw common sense and decency in the trash and make believe this BS is ok..., forget about it!
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:43 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:Govt. already tells us how to live our lives. Seatbelt laws? Helmet Laws? Cannot let children go play without adult supervision any longer like when I was a kid. Can't ride in the bed of pickups...the list is long about how govt. controls how to live our lives.
I would imagine you’d be pretty upset if someone told you how to live your life.
Defining man/woman was considered common sense till the DimProgTards insisted on blurring lines. Now they believe in squirrelkin, dragonkin, 200+ genders that are all fiction, unless they get defined! There is no 3rd or more gender, man or woman, that's it.
Party of Science? Consensus?
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:20 pm to 14&Counting
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:23 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
the taxpayer doesn’t fund it.
The taxpayer already does.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:26 pm to wmr
quote:
Chopping off a dude's dick doesn't make him a chick.
Indeed, there has LONG BEEN a DEFINITION.
Its called a fricking EUNUCH.
Not a fricking transvestite. frick this gay new world order.
edit: frick frick frick. Sorry, I realized I did not have enough fricks given in my post to properly express my melt.
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:30 pm to 14&Counting
I never cease to be amazed by the difficulty some display in distinguishing between physical/biological sex and behavioral/psychological gender.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:33 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
I think you’re missing my point. The government shouldn’t “claim” anything. If government starts defining gender, they will define anything. You can’t claim to defend liberty if you aren’t consistent about it.
So a person can’t claim defense of liberty if they want to prevent Bill the pedo from using the same bathroom as a 6 year old girl? What about the 6 year old’s liberty?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News