Started By
Message

re: Trump Defining Transgender Out of Exisitence

Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:32 pm to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

hurting




No. That would be weird.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

You just restated your original claim using slightly different words.


Incorrect. I specifically pointed to what is wrong here.

quote:

I get it.


You clearly don't.

quote:

you think there is some objective basis for believing someone can simply choose to be the opposite of what actual objective reality shows to be false, and this alternate "objective reality" is based on how they feel. The problem is that feelings are subjective and not based in actual observable reality


Told you.

quote:

Can you restate your point more clearly, without the basis being how one feeeels is true?


Feel has nothing to do with my position. It defines the thread, though.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Well, for thousands of years, everyone on the planet understood the concept.




What a stupid point. I don't know what's better. That you made it, or that you don't know why it's stupid.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Feel has nothing to do with my position. It defines the thread, though.

Yeah......no.
But you believe in you!
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:52 pm to
Is this where you try to argue that science supports your position despite a lack of understanding of the science? So far, feelings are what's been offered in the thread. Change my mind.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:59 pm to
Dude are you fricking autistic or something?

I’ve never seen someone so committed to being an online douchebag.
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11712 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

I'm 35 and I'll never have to work again


You're 35 and you still do "u mad" posts? Damn lol
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Is this where you try to argue that science supports your position despite a lack of understanding of the science?

No....not at all.
My position is based on the entirety of human history showing that the unifying structure of civilizations and culture is one man, one woman, one family, one culture.
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 7:10 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

u mad


You're a tool for even mentioning something so idiotic.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

I position is based on the entirety of human history showing that the unifying structure of civilizations and culture is one man, one woman, one family, one culture.


Well, you're wrong. Again. No surprise there. That's a subset, or maybe more correctly a byproduct of what unifies civilization. It's also a relatively modern interpretation of reality. For example, one man/one woman is complete bullshite across the entirety of human history. This is only applicable to some civilizations, and even those civilizations don't entirely adhere to the concept. Multiculturalism is also not some new concept that the evil liberals dreamed up in the last decade or so.

I'm glad you've decided to stay away from science, but your grasp of human history won't help you, either.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:14 pm to
You follow me around and are obsessed to the point that you've included me in your signature so you can always be close to me. I'm not the one with issues here, bud.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

I'm glad you've decided to stay away from science, but your grasp of human history won't help you, either.


Uh Huh...
Stunningly articulate argument you make!!
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Stunningly articulate argument you make!!


Indeed.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11315 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

You follow me around and are obsessed to the point that you've included me in your signature so you can always be close to me. I'm not the one with issues here, bud.


Oh but you are! Since you are old enough to type and still haven't been able to grasp the concept of gender, I suggest that you try to tackle one, perhaps simpler concept at a time.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

Indeed.



Indeed..indeed.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68271 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:34 pm to
This kind of clean up is much needed.

The national government is a 'big one size fits all' machine.

There just isn't room in there for this kind of customization of laws.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

gender


You strike me as someone who couldn't define this term without heading to Google or asking your preacher-man.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Since you are old enough to type and still haven't been able to grasp the concept of gender, I suggest that you try to tackle one, perhaps simpler concept at a time.
Do not be dense.

Part of the population accepts the premise that psychological/behavioral gender and physical/biological sex are not necessarily iin lockstep with one another, and part of the population insists that the two are co-extensive.

Buckeye falls iinto one category, and you into the other. Grow up.
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 7:42 pm
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23286 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Part of the population accepts the premise that psychological/behavioral gender and physical/biological sex are not necessarily iin lockstep with one another, and part of the population insists that the two are co-extensive


Keep building that strawman brother, buckeye will bring you the match
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram