- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/24/17 at 7:44 am to TBoy
quote:FIFY.
Obama and Clinton's continue to be Putin’s men
Posted on 10/24/17 at 7:52 am to member12
Frankly, it's the Trump acolytes who are the real joke, member 12, only they're more sad than funny.
You guys are incapable of understanding or analyzing anything except in terms of the extreme left vs. Trump and America ( or your insular view of America).
You guys are incapable of understanding or analyzing anything except in terms of the extreme left vs. Trump and America ( or your insular view of America).
Posted on 10/24/17 at 8:02 am to TBoy
Are we crying tears of pure uranium TBoy?
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:30 am to TBoy
quote:
Only a mindless Trump-bot would support Trump ignoring U.S. law in this manner.
Oh.. you mean like people ignoring U.S. law with regards to sanctuary cities??
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:51 am to TBoy
Something stinks with this.
Trump re-certified the Magnitsky Act, which essentially hammers Russia with a whole slew of sanctions and boycotts.
What exactly is he not "implementing" with these other sanctions? What does this new bill actually "sanction"?
You're using the freaking Daily Beast as a source on this for Christ sake. Every link they source in their articles are just links to their other articles. They never actually supply outside sources. They just write shite and then keep referring to their previous written shite acting like this backs up all their claims.
Who else is writing about this topic and confirming the accusations?
Trump re-certified the Magnitsky Act, which essentially hammers Russia with a whole slew of sanctions and boycotts.
What exactly is he not "implementing" with these other sanctions? What does this new bill actually "sanction"?
You're using the freaking Daily Beast as a source on this for Christ sake. Every link they source in their articles are just links to their other articles. They never actually supply outside sources. They just write shite and then keep referring to their previous written shite acting like this backs up all their claims.
Who else is writing about this topic and confirming the accusations?
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:53 am to TBoy
TBoy
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:56 am to TBoy
Sorry but it's impossible to care about y'alls Russia hysteria anymore when there is suspicious evidence around the uranium deal and every single one of you is dead fricking silent on it.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:56 am to VOR
quote:
You guys are incapable of understanding or analyzing anything except in terms of the extreme left vs. Trump and America ( or your insular view of America).
Well...I did ask the OP for the specific section of code the author of the article claims Trump has violated. I haven't seen it yet.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 9:58 am to VOR
quote:
You guys are incapable of understanding or analyzing anything
Pot...meet Kettle.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:24 am to Decatur
quote:
Well I think you have to consider how much this is due to just incompetence. This is a rather incompetent administration.
A good question but they've managed to start implementing some additional North Korea sanctions signed after the Russia bill, so I suspect it's intentional neglect.
Newsweek
This post was edited on 10/24/17 at 10:26 am
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:34 am to TigerDoc
Doc...my man....I know you will have the actual citation. What is the author of the article in the OP talking about? What section of the law is Trump ignoring?
This post was edited on 10/24/17 at 10:35 am
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:36 am to VOR
quote:
VOR
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:36 am to 91TIGER
quote:
91TIGER
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:54 am to Wolfhound45
Wait this guy is bitching about Trump not implementing something?
What about the line in the sand?
What about immigration laws?
What about 2nd amendment rights?
Was it Trump not implementing those things? Was it OP?
What about the line in the sand?
What about immigration laws?
What about 2nd amendment rights?
Was it Trump not implementing those things? Was it OP?
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:59 am to BeefDawg
quote:
Trump re-certified the Magnitsky Act, which essentially hammers Russia with a whole slew of sanctions and boycotts.
Unless he subsequently undermines Magnitsky in the same manner as Daily Beast is asserting here, and keeps Tillerson/Treasury from doing their jobs.
Keep in mind that Trump's campaign knowingly took a meeting with folks who outlandishly lie about Magnitsky and try to demonize everyone associated with it. Of course, the campaign may have taken it thinking they'd get info on HRC, but either way, it wasn't a good look.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 10:59 am to TBoy
quote:
Only a mindless Trump-bot would support Trump ignoring U.S. law in this manner. The U.S. government does not belong to Trump.
I'm not a Trump supporter but I do have a remedial understanding of civics which empowers me to know that the executive branch has the authority to execute laws made by the Congress through the means it sees best fit.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 11:01 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
I'm not a Trump supporter but I do have a remedial understanding of civics which empowers me to know that the executive branch has the authority to execute laws made by the Congress through the means it sees best fit.
I think we can all agree that the executive branch signing laws and then eroding their impact isn't exactly something we want more of, no?
Posted on 10/24/17 at 11:03 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I think we can all agree that the executive branch signing laws and then eroding their impact isn't exactly something we want more of, no?
Maybe not but that doesn't stop the act from being constitutional. And, from a historical perspective, this kind of thing happens all the time.
Posted on 10/24/17 at 11:05 am to TBoy
Putin is a conservative. So am I
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News