- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump charged with trying to delete Mar-a-Lago surveillance footage in new indictment
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:26 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:26 pm to GumboPot
We live in a country where good people keep saying that the police or military would protect us when the time came.
Face reality, every one working in some government job would screw you and your family if given a chance.
I've said it before. The house needs to defund the fbi and cia immediately.
Face reality, every one working in some government job would screw you and your family if given a chance.
I've said it before. The house needs to defund the fbi and cia immediately.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:58 pm to deeprig9
What sticks out to me most is they charged a new document that looks to be from the initial production in January 2022. Which apparently is the Iran document that Trump references in the Meadows memoir interview. I'd like to know the story behind this.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:01 pm to Marcus Aurelius
quote:
Did he bleachbit it?
Naw, BleachBit and hammers are approved evidence mitigating tools.....if you're a Groomer in good standing.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:16 pm to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Wait, he tried to delete the security system in his private house?
Yes, thats how desperate they are
His next indictment will be for using cash rather than a credit card at gas stations, to try to hide his travels
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:20 pm to Bass Tiger
Again I don’t think a trump did any of this. But:
If he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds
Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video
And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation
That would not be good for him at all. It would be very bad.
(Again, I think he didn’t do any of this and it’s all bs)
If he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds
Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video
And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation
That would not be good for him at all. It would be very bad.
(Again, I think he didn’t do any of this and it’s all bs)
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:42 pm to jatilen
didn't see this thread when i started mine
Trumps handling of this matter is just stupid and has put his supporters in a bad spot.
Trumps handling of this matter is just stupid and has put his supporters in a bad spot.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:54 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
think he didn’t do any of this and it’s all bs
amusing.
quote:
If he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds
Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video
And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation
dude #4.
mighty techie saves democracy.
i hope he gets witness protection.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:57 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds
Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video
And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation
That would not be good for him at all. It would be very bad.
It is worse than that. Trump had received a grand jury subpoena for the security footage. At that point it was absolutely illegal to try to delete it.
But it is weird that all they have are allegations that Nauta went to MAL to ask the IT guy about deleting the footage, but he couldn't.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:16 pm to GumboPot
quote:
So this is just an addendum to the original MAL indictment?
Pretty much. It is a "superseding indictment" that incorporates everything from the first indictment and adds quite a bit more, such as..
An additional codefendant;
Way more factual allegations about Trump failing to comply with requests and subpoenae regarding the documents;
Factual allegations of Trump showing the Iran document in Bedminster, and showing another classified document to a PAC representative; and
Additional counts relating to concealment, false statements, attempted destruction, yada yada.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 12:13 am to jamboybarry
quote:
But deleting your classified governmental emails is a ok
Deleting your classified government emails that are subject of a subpoena is something only demprogs can do with the permission of the dem supporters in the DOJ.
DOJ is about 90% dems according to Newt.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 7:47 am to Decatur
quote:
What sticks out to me most
This is very important.
Everyone. Pay attention. The progressive Biden voter is going to grace us with greatness.
Back to top

0





