Started By
Message

re: Trump charged with trying to delete Mar-a-Lago surveillance footage in new indictment

Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7895 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:26 pm to
We live in a country where good people keep saying that the police or military would protect us when the time came.

Face reality, every one working in some government job would screw you and your family if given a chance.

I've said it before. The house needs to defund the fbi and cia immediately.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31672 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:58 pm to
What sticks out to me most is they charged a new document that looks to be from the initial production in January 2022. Which apparently is the Iran document that Trump references in the Meadows memoir interview. I'd like to know the story behind this.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53682 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Did he bleachbit it?



Naw, BleachBit and hammers are approved evidence mitigating tools.....if you're a Groomer in good standing.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 9:02 pm
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33358 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Wait, he tried to delete the security system in his private house?

Yes, thats how desperate they are

His next indictment will be for using cash rather than a credit card at gas stations, to try to hide his travels
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127840 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:20 pm to
Again I don’t think a trump did any of this. But:

If he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds

Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video

And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation


That would not be good for him at all. It would be very bad.

(Again, I think he didn’t do any of this and it’s all bs)
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:42 pm to
didn't see this thread when i started mine

Trumps handling of this matter is just stupid and has put his supporters in a bad spot.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

think he didn’t do any of this and it’s all bs


amusing.

quote:

If he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds

Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video

And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation


dude #4.
mighty techie saves democracy.
i hope he gets witness protection.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

he was sent a Preserve Letter by the Feds

Then expressly directed and colluded with people to delete video

And those people testify that he did this for the purpose of obfuscating an investigation


That would not be good for him at all. It would be very bad.


It is worse than that. Trump had received a grand jury subpoena for the security footage. At that point it was absolutely illegal to try to delete it.

But it is weird that all they have are allegations that Nauta went to MAL to ask the IT guy about deleting the footage, but he couldn't.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

So this is just an addendum to the original MAL indictment?


Pretty much. It is a "superseding indictment" that incorporates everything from the first indictment and adds quite a bit more, such as..

An additional codefendant;

Way more factual allegations about Trump failing to comply with requests and subpoenae regarding the documents;

Factual allegations of Trump showing the Iran document in Bedminster, and showing another classified document to a PAC representative; and

Additional counts relating to concealment, false statements, attempted destruction, yada yada.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25063 posts
Posted on 7/28/23 at 12:13 am to
quote:

But deleting your classified governmental emails is a ok


Deleting your classified government emails that are subject of a subpoena is something only demprogs can do with the permission of the dem supporters in the DOJ.

DOJ is about 90% dems according to Newt.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154572 posts
Posted on 7/28/23 at 7:47 am to
quote:

What sticks out to me most



This is very important.


Everyone. Pay attention. The progressive Biden voter is going to grace us with greatness.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram