- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump campaign advisor George Papadopolous plead guilty on making false statements to FBI
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:56 pm to Kyrie Eleison
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:56 pm to Kyrie Eleison
and there is an email from May 4 where she's still trying to set up the meeting 
and another from May 13
and he's still trying to set it up into at least August of 2016
and another from May 13
and he's still trying to set it up into at least August of 2016
0
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
why was the indictment-plea of Pap unsealed today? was there some timeframe that forced it? i can't imagine that if he was still participating that they'd put it out there into the public like this, although i could be wrong
Sounds like Mueller may have reached the end, and this is all he got out of it
Unless he's now going after the Podestas
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:57 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Dayuuuum
JK complete coincidence
the "Campaign Supervisor" responded "make the trip [], if it is feasible."
...
on August 15
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:58 pm to League Champs
quote:
Sounds like Mueller may have reached the end, and this is all he got out of it
Unless he's now going after the Podestas
yeah i think he's done with Pap, Manafort, and Gates
i don't get this "Pap is cooperating" stuff. it just doesn't make sense
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:03 pm to Decatur
quote:
Wondering if Papadopolous is a cooperating witness now.
"now"?...lol.
he's referred to by the DOJ as a "proactive cooperator." that's a specific term of art that we prosecutors use.
it means at some point he wore a wire.
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:04 pm to Kyrie Eleison
quote:
a term of art that we prosecutors use.
why would they unseal his indictment/plea today, if he's this major cooperator? what advantage does that bring, on today of all days?
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
Let's be real for one minute..
Dude was trying to dig up dirt on Clinton. He was trying to get it from Russians. Higher-ups in the campaign knew it. They made efforts to keep DT's name out of it. The Trump campaign ended up meeting with Russians for exactly the reason dude was working on.
Now, collusion isn't a crime
But that is certainly collusion
So all of the cries about the SC don't matter. There's collusion, and he's investigating it, and it will continue for a while.
Dude was trying to dig up dirt on Clinton. He was trying to get it from Russians. Higher-ups in the campaign knew it. They made efforts to keep DT's name out of it. The Trump campaign ended up meeting with Russians for exactly the reason dude was working on.
Now, collusion isn't a crime
But that is certainly collusion
So all of the cries about the SC don't matter. There's collusion, and he's investigating it, and it will continue for a while.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
it's a message to the Executive branch that there's more coming (a lot more), and it's related to the original charge given the Special Counsel.
in other words, shite's about to get real.
in other words, shite's about to get real.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:07 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Dude was trying to dig up dirt on Clinton. He was trying to get it from Russians. Higher-ups in the campaign knew it. They made efforts to keep DT's name out of it. The Trump campaign ended up meeting with Russians for exactly the reason dude was working on.
but it appears to be completely independent of each other
quote:
Now, collusion isn't a crime
But that is certainly collusion
i mean even accepting all of your above as true, everyone was "colluding" with Russia. if it's not a crime, then what are we doing? if it is a crime, is everyone going to jail? i honestly don't care either way.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:08 pm to Kyrie Eleison
quote:
it's a message to the Executive branch that there's more coming (a lot more), and it's related to the original charge given the Special Counsel.
still doesn't make any sense, especially given that it has to share the spotlight with Manafort (which isn't related to Trump)
why not wait a week, or release the info a week prior? having it dropped the same day as Manafort doesn't make much sense unless there is some law requiring its release.
quote:
in other words, shite's about to get real.
even his indictment says the meeting he was trying to have, never happened
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I dunno. I'm just here for the party.
then what are we doing? if it is a crime, is everyone going to jail? i honestly don't care either way.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i mean even accepting all of your above as true, everyone was "colluding" with Russia. if it's not a crime, then what are we doing? if it is a crime, is everyone going to jail? i honestly don't care either way.
It's complete madness, Slo.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:45 pm to roadGator
quote:
I can think of a few. They may not admit it though.
We must find them......
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:57 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
I dunno. I'm just here for the party.
Sore loser lefties like you have been looking for a party ever since your big November 8, 2016 party was cancelled.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
still doesn't make any sense, especially given that it has to share the spotlight with Manafort (which isn't related to Trump) why not wait a week, or release the info a week prior? having it dropped the same day as Manafort doesn't make much sense unless there is some law requiring its release.
NBC News: Manafort is one of the unnamed officials in Papadopoulos document
So this is how they are connected. Mueller has Papadopolus' confession with emails including Manafort telling him to work with the Russians on Clinton dirt.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 2:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
NBC News: Manafort is one of the unnamed officials in Papadopoulos document So this is how they are connected. Mueller has Papadopolus' confession with emails including Manafort telling him to work with the Russians on Clinton dirt.
DC09 arriving is effectively the liberal white flag.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 3:02 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
DC09 arriving is effectively the liberal white flag.
I see you're just avoiding the facts once again.
Posted on 10/30/17 at 3:07 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
NBC News: Manafort is one of the unnamed officials in Papadopoulos document
So this is how they are connected. Mueller has Papadopolus' confession with emails including Manafort telling him to work with the Russians on Clinton dirt.
so we expect more indictments against Manfort? because what he was indicted for has literally nothing to do with Pap's case
do we think that the prosecutor is threatening Manafort when he already dropped like 10 charges on him today?
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 10/30/17 at 3:07 pm to Kyrie Eleison
quote:
it's a message to the Executive branch that there's more coming (a lot more), and it's related to the original charge given the Special Counsel.
in other words, shite's about to get real.
And what message did it send to Podesta, since he doesn't happen to be part of the Executive branch
I think you're about to be hugely surprised on who the shite is about to get real on
Posted on 10/30/17 at 3:13 pm to tigerinDC09
How would Papadopolus know that the “Professor” had substantial connections to Russian government officials?
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News