Started By
Message

re: Trump and Murdoch

Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7847 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:00 pm to
Sounds like a slam dunk. Can’t imagine anyway this will end differently.

Let’s bookmark it and find out!
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19350 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:04 pm to
Amazed that you can be this retarded.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90338 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:04 pm to
What settlement isn't a business decision?
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7847 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:10 pm to
That merger is being held up by the FCC, which is controlled by Trump. If that ain’t leverage for a settlement, I dunno what is.

Unless Trump has some similar leverage over WSJ (I suppose that’s possible) you’re not doing yourself any favors conflating the two.

Especially after WSJ saw what happened to CBS and said yeah we’re doing it anyway…
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90338 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:19 pm to
Lol well I guess we will see.
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
3341 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

That merger is being held up by the FCC, which is controlled by Trump. If that ain’t leverage for a settlement, I dunno what is.

Unless Trump has some similar leverage over WSJ (I suppose that’s possible) you’re not doing yourself any favors conflating the two.

Especially after WSJ saw what happened to CBS and said yeah we’re doing it anyway…


So, you think Trump used his authority to force a settlement and would have lost? What magic leverage did he have on ABC?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90338 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:20 pm to
Yeah he is blackmailing them. Lol
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143711 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:21 pm to
He mostly did it to settle a bet between Nashville Tider and Violent Hip Swivel.

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23879 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:22 pm to
Discovery will take longer than Rupert's life.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7847 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:29 pm to
Are you talking about Stephanopolous stepping on his own dick in that live interview? He fricked up for sure.

Pretty different situation IMO (live, on air for all of us to see and hear) but if you want to think they’re all the same, be my guest.

I guess I could see a world where enough Fox viewers revolt, maybe that’s the Trump leverage on RM & WSJ?

Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7847 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:39 pm to
No, he can’t force cbs to settle (16mil) but he absolutely can block/delay/drag out their merger (8bil) for a long time via the fcc, if not indefinitely.

Pretend you’re the CEO of cbs, even if you thought you’d win that case, would you really risk a 16m settlement getting in the way of an 8b merger? That’s the point.

On the other hand, If you’re really arguing Trump can’t get the FCC (run by Trump appointees) to do what he wants, I dunno what to tell you man.
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 10:41 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89557 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:42 pm to
His DIL worked for the clintons while his son was in charge of fox.

It’s one big club.

Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
3341 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a slam dunk. Can’t imagine anyway this will end differently.

Let’s bookmark it and find out!



Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19350 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:18 pm to
The WSJ will subside a large wing of Trump's library. It's inevitable.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
49652 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Murdoch has never liked Trump.


Murdoch's sons are even worse than he is. In fact Rupert went to court in an attempt to change his will so that a 3rd son would control his business interests rather than the other 2 sons who are left-wing nutjobs.

Funny thing is, I don't think the court would let him make the change. I always thought anybody could make changes to their own will.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34131 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

They didn’t run the story unless they knew on good authority it would hold up to legitimate legal scrutiny.

Now do FoxNews (another Murdoch business) and Dominion?


Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23882 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:44 pm to




Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39389 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

You don’t have to like the WSJ but they’re not stupid. They didn’t run the story unless they knew on good authority it would hold up to legitimate legal scrutiny.


Zealots aren't reasonable people.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6260 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Funny thing is, I don't think the court would let him make the change. I always thought anybody could make changes to their own will.


His issues in changing the inheritance structure is because its not a will, its in a irrevocable trust he already established

As far as MSM goes, Murdoch is not bad (he is still a fricker). Its a shame Fox is almost certain to become another NBC once he passes though, his kids (outside of the 1 son), have already said they plan on making it less "partisan"
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 9:35 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36551 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:36 pm to
They can make it another NBC going into it with the full knowledge that they’re about to start nosediving in ratings and losing money, I suppose…..just like NBC.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram