Started By
Message

re: Trump Admin tells Boasberg they are no longer playing his game

Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:43 pm to
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9452 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:43 pm to
quote:


Piss on this judge and his kind. These terrorist are just that. And if that ain’t enough, they are also here illegally. They have NO rights to do a damn thing. That includes legal representation.


no....they are actually there to make sure that the executive is doing things within the law. You just don't like it when it's pointed out how the executive is outside of the law and the constitution
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79433 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:43 pm to
The court can also determine if the president’s actions fall within the Act.
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9452 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

The court can also determine if the president’s actions fall within the Act.


Correct. It's simply a check to make sure the act was applied properly. If the trump admin did things right then it shouldnt be an issue at all. If they don't like the ruling they can appeal.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

You won’t say what “properly invoked” means


Neither did the Supreme Court. That’s the judge’s discretion part. I shouldn’t have to spell this out for you. Please point me to the portion of the ruling that states the judge determines whether the information is a states secret. TIA.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20205 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

no....they are actually there to make sure that the executive is doing things within the law. You just don't like it when it's pointed out how the executive is outside of the law and the constitution


Nope, nope, nope….this law has been on the book for over 2 centuries and has withstood judicial review buddy. This country, and people like you, have been brainwashed to think this judicial review is typical. Do you know the percentage of nationwide TROs under Trumps administration over the past 100 years? It’s not because his policies are outside the norm either!
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20205 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Correct. It's simply a check to make sure the act was applied properly. If the trump admin did things right then it shouldnt be an issue at all. If they don't like the ruling they can appeal.


You realize that is the administration wanted to really cause an uproar that they could shop a friendly judge (like the Dems do) and sue back to get the TRO lifted. That’s basically how stupid it is that a district court judge can stop everything in their tracks and hold shite up until the Supreme Court can rule.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79433 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

You realize that is the administration wanted to really cause an uproar that they could shop a friendly judge (like the Dems do) and sue back to get the TRO lifted.


Who would they sue?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22731 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Who would they sue?

I agree with you. They should just ignore the idiot.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

You realize that is the administration wanted to really cause an uproar that they could shop a friendly judge (like the Dems do) and sue back to get the TRO lifted.
Someone has never read the FRCP
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 7:15 pm
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Thats not completely true. It is subject to questions regarding constitutionality . You can't just misapply the act and then hid behind that wording.
Only SCOTUS can review the application in regards to constitutionality. Not a lower court. So not subject to review or injunctions of any lower court.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram