Started By
Message

re: True or False: In a world with no billionaires

Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:09 pm to
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11458 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

If you let mob rule dictate what you can have and keep you quickly go from targeting billionaires to millionaires, to straight up socialism/communism quickly.


What's the end result of communism? Wealth and power concentrated in the hands of a few.

What's the end result of our current system? Wealth and power concentrated in the hands of a few.

The end result is the same, but we got there through "the right way," so hooray I guess.

No one is calling for socialism or communism, but the absolutists refuse to acknowledge history - when the wealth disparity reaches a certain inflection point, bad things happen. Society experiences unrest.

It's not a crazy thought to analyze history and the current situation and come to the conclusion that a slight tweak to the current system might be beneficial.

The problem is that so many people think that if you are not 100% for unfettered capitalism, which always results in crony capitalism, then you are 100% headed to communism.

There is a balance that can be achieved to uplift the general working population while still enjoying personal freedoms. But whenever anyone makes such a suggestion, conservatives immediately label them as a socialist. There's a purity test for everything, and it blinds people from seeing more effective solutions.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14037 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

I do worry about growing wealth inequality


Why?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14037 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:53 pm to
quote:


What's the end result of our current system?


The highest standard of living, comfort, convenience, life expectancy, and health care ever known on this planet.
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 4:59 pm
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14037 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

No one is calling for socialism or communism, but the absolutists refuse to acknowledge history - when the wealth disparity reaches a certain inflection point, bad things happen.


Can you give me an example?

And to be clear, you're claiming a causal relationship, right?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14037 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

The top 1% of households owned 31.7% of all U.S. wealth in the third quarter of 2025, the highest share on record since the Federal Reserve began tracking household wealth in 1989. That share has increased even as wealth growth for the rest of the population has stalled or slowed, the data shows.


Again, so what?

Poor people today—even with all that wealth disparity—live better, more comfortable and healthy lives than middle class people 70 years ago and kings 200 years ago.

And our current system is what produced that outcome.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89273 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

billionaires hoard money


Point and laugh at this man.

He clearly thinks most, if not all, billionaires are completely liquid.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89273 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I do worry about growing wealth inequality


It’s not a zero sum game. Wealth is not finite.
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5483 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Wait what… wealth is relative to the societal situation… it has always been haves and have-not



Absolutely right. But when you look at the proportions, things have changed drastically. 200+ years ago, there was a filthy rich king, there were the rich nobles, and then a circle of friend, generals, and suckups that were rich. If you had a country of perhaps the size of France (21m at 1700 year) there were perhaps 1,000 fabulously wealthy, 1m middle class, 10m working class (as in can almost cover rent and food most months), and maybe 10m destitute and starving.

As the means of creating wealth and doing business increased, those proportions have changed to see a huge middle class, a working class with ability to have multiple cars and travel, and a much larger rich class.

Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16740 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

You think taking his money is going to benefit you in any way?


No, but it will enrich DC politicians.

Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
1769 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 8:52 pm to
I’d rather have a thousand millionaires than one billionaire.
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
6180 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 9:25 pm to
We don't need billionaires, but we need the opportunity to become a billionaire. If personal wealth was capped at say 500 million, where would Elon's future earnings go, 100% tax? Super risky endeavors that he didn't care if they were successful? Trust funds for his 13 kids so that he wasn't a billionaire, but each of his kids were?
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
6180 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

billionaires hoard money


They only time hoarding money is a net drain on the populace is if they keep cash in their mattress. If you have a mortgage on your house, someone needed to put money in a bank to be available to lend to you.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22804 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

I’d rather have a thousand millionaires than one billionaire.

Here's the question you should be asking yourself -

Would you rather have a thousand billionaires and 25 million millionaires, or zero billionaires and 10 million millionaires?
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 9:47 pm
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
18022 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

they are the ones supplying the jobs


Small businesses employ more employees than any other employment sector. Not billionaires.
Posted by Lou
Modesto, CA
Member since Aug 2005
8860 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 12:02 am to
Ethiopia has no billionaires. Maybe it would look like that.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
20441 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 12:30 am to
quote:

False. Especially if we assume that it would increase the overall wealth of the classes below them.




Making one man poor does not make another one rich. This is about as dumb a statement as one can make.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram