- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/29/23 at 7:03 pm to Decatur
You’re such a dishonest frick face.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 7:06 pm to MrLSU
we are on the verge of war. You can't be reasonable with unreasonable people.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 7:45 pm to Devon_Stack
quote:
Devon_Stack
The regressive frick boys need to go back to DU.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 7:58 pm to Rebel
quote:
we are on the verge of war. You can't be reasonable with unreasonable people.
Just here to remind everyone that these are the same people pushing for nationalized digital currencies.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:02 pm to Decatur
quote:
I don' think that's what it means.
It’s exactly what it means. How can you not see it? Do you agree with excluding people from commerce because they have a certain political belief?
I certainly hope not. This is the stuff that collapses society
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:41 pm to Decatur
As usual Decatur, you make a statement and then retract from debate. That is your right, of course, but why?
I rarely agree with things you say. I could go on about that. But, this is where I think the biggest difference lies between our thought patterns.
If this was happening to you, I would defend you. I would call out this in Justice and say it is wrong, no matter who was the person or group harming you. Would you do the same?
I have my doubts. And that is exactly what is destroying this country. We have reached a point where common sense is thrown out so that political points can be won. But at what cost?
In my opinion we are headed towards very bleak times in this country because we are not being led by reasonable people that reject this type of foolishness.
I rarely agree with things you say. I could go on about that. But, this is where I think the biggest difference lies between our thought patterns.
If this was happening to you, I would defend you. I would call out this in Justice and say it is wrong, no matter who was the person or group harming you. Would you do the same?
I have my doubts. And that is exactly what is destroying this country. We have reached a point where common sense is thrown out so that political points can be won. But at what cost?
In my opinion we are headed towards very bleak times in this country because we are not being led by reasonable people that reject this type of foolishness.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:46 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
As usual Decatur, you make a statement and then retract from debate.
I went to dinner.
Do you have any idea why he mentions this "publicly exposed person" phrase? I listened to the interview and he said that the banks told him it was for "commercial reasons". Just trying to understand what he was getting at with that.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:47 pm to Devon_Stack
quote:
"We don't need government regulation telling them what to do or how to run their business"
EU interference is the cause of this you tard.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:52 pm to Decatur
Lexis Nexis Definition of Politically Explosed Person "PEP"
In order to ensure your organization fully complies with financial crime compliance regulations, it is essential that you and your team are aware of who or what a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) could potentially be, in order to identify them and carry out enhanced due diligence procedures.
Providing a definitive list of who could be classed as a PEP is difficult, as the criteria is so broad; international definitions vary and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is frequently issuing updated recommendations.
In basic terms, a Politically Exposed Person is someone who, through their prominent position or influence, is more susceptible to being involved in bribery or corruption.
In order to ensure your organization fully complies with financial crime compliance regulations, it is essential that you and your team are aware of who or what a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) could potentially be, in order to identify them and carry out enhanced due diligence procedures.
Providing a definitive list of who could be classed as a PEP is difficult, as the criteria is so broad; international definitions vary and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is frequently issuing updated recommendations.
In basic terms, a Politically Exposed Person is someone who, through their prominent position or influence, is more susceptible to being involved in bribery or corruption.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 8:55 pm to Devon_Stack
quote:
"conservatives"
Posted on 6/29/23 at 9:32 pm to jrobic4
Dems want the same thing here
Posted on 6/29/23 at 9:53 pm to Decatur
He discussed it in the Twitter video. Rewatch it and you should easily understand that this is a BS rule that is being used politically.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 9:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
Just trying to understand what he was getting at with that.
He is getting at he can't do any banking due to his political beliefs.
He is being punished because he believes in personal responsibility. He is being punished because he doesn't believe in open borders. He is being punished because he doesn't believe in mothers killing children in the womb.
You are being disingenuous.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 9:58 pm to MrLSU
quote:
In basic terms, a Politically Exposed Person is someone who, through their prominent position or influence, is more susceptible to being involved in bribery or corruption.
Yes. Now, have all politicians in the UK been giving walking papers from their bank and not allowed to bank at all now?
Or, is it just Nigel?
And why is that? Politics
Posted on 6/29/23 at 10:06 pm to Decatur
quote:
Curious what others think.
It means that left doesn’t like what he is saying, so they are using the banks to ostracize him.
It is a tactic the leftist filth in this country dream about deploying.
I have no doubt that you would support similar measures here.
Posted on 6/29/23 at 10:22 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Rewatch it and you should easily understand that this is a BS rule that is being used politically.
I’ve seen the definition of PEP, at least a generic definition. What’s the rule here though?
Posted on 6/30/23 at 2:42 am to Devon_Stack
You don't get it do you, you stupid frick.
Posted on 6/30/23 at 2:46 am to thermal9221
You don't know who he is, yet you call someone weirdo for calling you out, you're a dumbass.
Posted on 6/30/23 at 5:29 am to The Baker
quote:
Conservatives better hope they don’t get their wish with banning crypto currencies…
Democrats are the ones trying to ban crypto
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News