Started By
Message
locked post

Todays political climate proves my hypothesis that we entered WW2 on the wrong side

Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:06 pm
Posted by Draco Malfoy
Member since Mar 2024
2858 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:06 pm
Communism, bolshevism, socialism, whatever you want to call it is the epitome of evil. We should have remained completely neutral in WW2 and let Europe to its own devices. The Nazis would have eradicated communism then eventually imploded.

Look at Europe now. Look at the Left here in our country. Patton was right. Lindbergh was right
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 10:07 pm
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
12576 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Patton was right. Lindbergh was right

One thing is not like the other…
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
41553 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:11 pm to
War started over the sanctity of Poland’s sovereignty

War ended with Poland occupied by the Soviet Union

Wow, what a swell war we had
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
24582 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:11 pm to
The problem with your argument is many. We hardly had a military and if we stay out we never build it. Then Germany takes over that part of world and could easily invade here afterwards. Or Hitler gets the bomb and blackmails us to surrender. And don’t forget about Japan they were allies of Germany but made enemies of us.
Posted by Draco Malfoy
Member since Mar 2024
2858 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

War started over the sanctity of Poland’s sovereignty War ended with Poland occupied by the Soviet Union


I’ve never thought of it this way and damn my mind is blown
Posted by Draco Malfoy
Member since Mar 2024
2858 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

could easily invade here afterwards.


Easily cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade?
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
3997 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:14 pm to
Japan attacked us and was an ally of Germany. Did we have many alternative options?
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89101 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:14 pm to
had the nazis been able to put all their forces on the eastern front they beat the russians. hell they gave them a run early anyway kicking their arse in operation barbarosa for awhile. it all went to shite after battle of stalingrad.

shoulda told nazis do not put anybody in africa or western europe go beat the commies. then take them out after they suffer heavy losses taking out the commies.

Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154170 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:15 pm to
The discovery of America enriched the West, then the Industrial Revolution furthered empowered them. Thus for 400+ yrs they were blind to the real threat.

Now we are in the middle of the most important historical event since Columbus: the Muslim infiltration of the West.

Soon we must decide if we will fight as at Tours & Vienna, or if we will surrender.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15435 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

And don’t forget about Japan


Should have let the Japanese smoke China
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 10:20 pm
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
41553 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Then Germany takes over that part of world


Germany having the responsibility of Europe rather than us would have been an incredible blessing for us.

The only argument to justify eliminating them is the Holocaust, and while that is indeed a good reason, I’m not convinced they would have carried it out had they not been cornered and desperate (which was only possible due to our propping up the allies, and our eventual invasion).
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:18 pm to
Shut the frick up. Patton said that we should have kept marching to Moscow, not that we should have joined the Nazis.

frick off, Tard!
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
30619 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Todays political climate proves my hypothesis that we entered WW2 on the wrong side



Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
895 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:19 pm to
Germany declared war on the US. That pretty much set which side we would be on.

What we shouldn't have done is allied with the USSR, and we also shouldn't have sent 90% of our resources to Europe. We should have concentrated on Japan. However, the Navy that defeated Japan was the Navy that our congress approved in 1940, it just took five years to build it, so in the meantime we could have supplied weapons to Europe but not troops, and made the US very wealthy.

One other thing to note is that Mexico and most of the Central and South American countries entered the war on the side of the Allies on Dec. 7 or Dec. 8 1941. Some did so even before we declared war on Japan on Dec. 8. It was a different world then.
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 10:22 pm
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42011 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Nazis would have eradicated communism then eventually imploded.




Not so sure on them beating Russia
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89101 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Soon we must decide if we will fight as at Tours & Vienna, or if we will surrender.


i have been saying this since 9-11.

yup charles martel saved france.

polish general jan sobieski saved europe at the gates of vienna.

with the spanish reconquista thrown in also. jews living in spain hated the king and queen of spain and bankrolled the muzzie invaders. dumbasses.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

had the nazis been able to put all their forces on the eastern front they beat the russians. hell they gave them a run early anyway kicking their arse in operation barbarosa for awhile. it all went to shite after battle of stalingrad.

shoulda told nazis do not put anybody in africa or western europe go beat the commies. then take them out after they suffer heavy losses taking out the commies.


Fat Bastard, we’re on fine terms now, but come the frick on. Regardless of my ideology even if I personally was a Nazi, the Nazis would have killed me. They are evil. Stop defending them for frick’s sake.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
41553 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Not so sure on them beating Russia


Russia would have been finished in 1942 if not for the United States providing half of the supplies
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
24582 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Easily cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade?


Have you ever looked at our military pre war? And if we stay out we never have any urgency to build it up. Our factories are not making tanks and planes and ships. We never create the nuclear bomb. Meanwhile Germany would have used every asset of Europe including prisoner labor to build ships

Don’t forget without us England is toast. And the German subs rule the waters allowing invasion once they build ships (pus would have other nations ships).

In June 1939, which was three months before England declared war on Germany, "the roughly 180,000-man U.S. Army ranked 19th in the world--smaller than Portugal’s!"

Some 10 million men entered military service during World War II, most of them volunteers

Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89101 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:21 pm to
US manufacturing saved the brits and euros asses during WW2

then we rebuilt their arse with the marshall plan.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram