- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:00 pm to boosiebadazz
It will obviously be fast tracked to SCOTUS. Everyone should be able to see this coming. Ray Charles can see it coming.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:08 pm to Friscodog
quote:
Can someone please call a vote of no confidence in Thune and challenge him for Majority Leader of Senate?
PLEASE!!!!!!!
There has to be at least 5 who have the balls to do it.
If not, we are screwed regardless...
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:18 pm to BoarEd
Funny. It would have been the same outcome for the SAVE Act if the dems had control of the Senate.
Makes you wonder…
Makes you wonder…
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:19 pm to Sharlo
They all know that they benefit from cheating. Rs and Ds alike.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:32 pm to Jbird
.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:56 pm to BoarEd
But if it’s something he could do via EO all along, why did he need Congress?
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:57 pm to boosiebadazz
I'd like to get in on this one but what are yall arguing about?
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:00 pm to GRTiger
BoarEd says Trump can sign an EO to do the same thing as the SAVE Act. I asked why he pitty-pattied with Congress for a year if that’s the case.
I also asked that if/when the EO gets struck down if he’s going to call the judge an activist.
I also asked that if/when the EO gets struck down if he’s going to call the judge an activist.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:02 pm to boosiebadazz
I know where I land here but I would like to hear Ed before I deliver my judgement.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:06 pm to boosiebadazz
I’m not Ed, but the reason is to codify it in law rather than an EO that will be struck down by a judge and thrown to the courts. We have a majority in congress but for some reason our party doesn’t want to pass it and it was explicitly a campaign item Trump ran on to secure American elections. It’s mind blowing that people are against voter id after the last two presidential elections.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:09 pm to DeBoar
quote:
I’m not Ed, but the reason is to codify it in law rather than an EO that will be struck down by a judge and thrown to the courts
Because it has to emanate in Congress. The President can’t just EO whatever he wants.
quote:
We have a majority in congress but for some reason our party doesn’t want to pass it and it was explicitly a campaign item Trump ran on to secure American elections. It’s mind blowing that people are against voter id after the last two presidential elections.
That’s a political issue the President needs to solve via political channels, not trying to end-around the Constitution via EO.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:34 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
BoarEd says Trump can sign an EO to do the same thing as the SAVE Act.
I'm just telling you what he has said he's gonna frickin do. I don't care if you don't like it.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:39 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Because it has to emanate in Congress. The President can’t just EO whatever he wants.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:46 pm to DeBoar
Sending it to the SCOTUS isn't necessarily a bad call. The 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendments all discuss citizens having the right to vote. Having the highest court in the land weigh in on what that entails insofar as making sure only citizens vote isn't a bad idea. Although obviously, it would be ideal if the Congress would do their frickin job and codify it.
But again, Trump has already said that if they won't do it, he will. Folks like Boosie can bitch and moan about it, or try to turn it into an argument, but it's frickin pointless. It's happening whether his bitch arse likes it or not.
But again, Trump has already said that if they won't do it, he will. Folks like Boosie can bitch and moan about it, or try to turn it into an argument, but it's frickin pointless. It's happening whether his bitch arse likes it or not.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:51 pm to BoarEd
I think they’d fight that it’s the states rights since that’s been the argument. I would like to get it clarified that federal elections should be under the purview of the federal government. They also need to sort out the timing of results as California is beyond ridiculous.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 12:04 am to DeBoar
quote:
I think they’d fight that it’s the states rights since that’s been the argument
It would be the first time the left has ever argued for state's rights that I'm aware of. And again, it doesn't matter. This is the route Trump said he will go if the Congress doesn't pass it. I'm ready for the rubber to meet the road. Let's put the cards on the table.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 12:44 am to BoarEd
Recess appointments proceed now?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News