- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is yet more proof that the 2020 election was stolen
Posted on 12/19/23 at 10:53 pm to the808bass
Posted on 12/19/23 at 10:53 pm to the808bass
quote:
His argument is “if Trump was demolished in the 2020 election and lost Colorado by a ton of legitimate votes, there’s no reason to remove him from the Colorado ballot.” It’s not the worst argument.
Ballot harvesting doesn’t produce 20 point swings. This argument would make more sense if they tried it in a state where cheating probably made a difference, like Georgia. Or better yet, a state he won and will win again, then it’s a difference maker.
All this move does in a state like Colorado is confirm that people there hate him enough there that they’re ok with it. It’s politically feasible there, it wouldn’t be in Georgia or Florida.
2
Posted on 12/19/23 at 11:15 pm to Flats
quote:
Ballot harvesting doesn’t produce 20 point swings
Not sure what 20 point swing you’re referring to but in 2016 HRC barely squeaked by Trump when you consider Gary Johnson taking a good deal from Trump. HRC win by 5% which was exactly how much Johnson got.
In other words, CO was probably not as Blue as Dems would like us to believe.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 11:31 pm to Robin Masters
Sfp and boosie are ok with cheating as long as it keeps trump out of office
Posted on 12/20/23 at 4:27 am to Flats
quote:
All this move does in a state like Colorado is confirm that people there hate him enough there that they’re ok with it. It’s politically feasible there, it wouldn’t be in Georgia or Florida.
They’re not going to just do lawfare in states where it’s “politically feasible.”
Fraud can do whatever you want, if you’re committed to it. 20 point swings are possible. I’m not suggesting that Trump actually won Colorado last time. I’m suggesting you are underestimating the commitment to win at all costs from the Marxists and their fraud capabilities.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 4:28 am to Walt OReilly
quote:
Sfp and boosie are ok with cheating
They’re ok with it as long as the cool kids are ok with it. It doesn’t have much to do with Trump for them.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 4:46 am to Robin Masters
So unpopular , he got 10 million more votes than he did when beating Hillary.
Let that sink in.
Let that sink in.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 6:09 am to SouthEasternKaiju
So unpopular, he received more votes than any GOP candidate in history.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 6:13 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 12/20/23 at 7:57 am to the808bass
quote:
They’re not going to just do lawfare in states where it’s “politically feasible.”
I didn't claim they would, I'm talking about trying to take him off the ballot. You think they'll do that in Florida or Georgia? I don't. I don't think it'll work even in Colorado, but they feel safe trying it there.
quote:
Fraud can do whatever you want, if you’re committed to it. 20 point swings are possible.
There are practical limits to ballot harvesting, and they probably nudged up against them last time with an unprecedented set of circumstances. If they could whip out a 20 point swing whenever they felt like it the GOP would control nothing, ever. Reagan/Mondale was a 20 point victory.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:11 am to blueboxer1119
quote:
So unpopular, he received more votes than any GOP candidate in history.
So unpopular, he received more votes against than any candidate, GOP or otherwise, in history.
Although I'd add that "popular" isn't really the correct term here, and it implies a large margin. We're still a closely divided country so he's still about as popular as he is unpopular. The vote totals you're talking about come from him being polarizing, not popular or unpopular. Polarizing people drive turnout, and you guys just want to focus on the pro-Trump turnout but it doesn't work that way. Turnout cuts both ways.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:19 am to Robin Masters
quote:
They stole it in 2020
quote:
and they are trying again
Why wouldn't they, when they have faced no ramifications or consequences for doing so in 2020?
Word is finally starting to actually get out that there was most definitely outcome-affecting fraud in 2020 that even the general public is finally seeing and admitting, but these people that are just now seeing it will just think, "Well, the cat is out of the bag now, so there's no way they'll risk trying to do that again because they can't get away with it this time."
Ignorance has destroyed this nation. Frogs cheering for the bath water to get warmer, faster.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 1:17 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Word is finally starting to actually get out that there was most definitely outcome-affecting fraud in 2020 that even the general public is finally seeing and admitting, but these people that are just now seeing it will just think, "Well, the cat is out of the bag now, so there's no way they'll risk trying to do that again because they can't get away with it this time."
Ignorance has destroyed this nation. Frogs cheering for the bath water to get warmer, faster.
On local 990am it was announced that about 20% have admitted that they were involved in some type of voter fraud in the last election, which in numbers amounts to over 13,000,000 which was way more than enough to turn the election.
Which was reported 8 days ago.
LINK
It's also likely that there were more than that number involved who would never admit to it.
The Brookings Institute says it's all lies.
LINK
Of course it's just coincidence that Brookings, like Aspen and others, is another "tentacle" of Tavistock.
No word from them and no admission that they fed opposition research lies to Danchenko while he worked for FusionGPS and Glenn Simpson who actually contracted with Chris Steele for his "dossier."
But for the Repubs, this is all coming out 3 years later - so convenient. But it's likely what they wanted.
As goes fraud, were Orleans not in a red state, our over 70,000 illegitimate names on the burgeoning nearly bursting voter rolls that Registrar Sandra Wilson has no intention of addressing could swing just about every statewide election. But would only be done for the benefit of leftist candidates.
Sandra would have to be prodded by higher-ups in State government.
But not by the new Secretary of State Nancy Landry; she has already been quoted as believing that everything is just fine with the rolls.
But when Jeff Landry was approached regarding doing something about the voter rolls, his answer was to the effect, "That's a federal issue." Huh?
If the two Landrys are listening - Jeff and Nancy and Liz Murrill - just to refresh their memories if needed:
Orleans has a population of about 377,000.
In keeping with the national average, it should have around 193,000 registered voters.
It has 266,000 registered voters.
Even if this populace is more civic-minded than the rest of the country, the figures bear close scrutiny because they just don't work, no matter the level of enthusiasm and civic participation.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 1:40 pm to David_DJS
This is not to suggest that any of Stalinist Show trials will result in Trump going to jail, but no matter what he'll be able to run.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/run-president-prison-ask-smithsonian-180974594/
quote:
Q: Has anyone ever run for president while in prison?
— L. M. Frank | Los Angeles
Eugene V. Debs was in an Atlanta penitentiary, serving a ten-year sentence, when he lost the 1920 presidential election. Two years earlier, Debs, a labor leader, had spoken out against America’s involvement in World War I. He was convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917, after the prosecution argued that his antiwar speech obstructed military enrollment. The 1920 loss didn’t come as a surprise to Debs, who had run four times before. His fifth and final run, promoted with a campaign button that read “For President Convict No. 9653,” brought him nearly one million votes, says Claire Jerry, curator of political history at the National Museum of American History. President Harding commuted his sentence in December 1921.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/run-president-prison-ask-smithsonian-180974594/
Posted on 12/20/23 at 1:46 pm to Auburn1968
the Trump card about to be played,SCOTUS
Posted on 12/20/23 at 3:42 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
u groomer filth
I’m sure you will get over this. But this misplaced anger isn’t gonna help. You have my pity as well.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 3:49 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
I’m not seeing it.
Besides, democrats don’t leave things up to the voters. They seize power by any means necessary.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 3:50 pm to Robin Masters
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News