- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why millennials are unhappy
Posted on 4/5/22 at 4:29 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 4/5/22 at 4:29 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Let's apply that 3.45x to some of these amounts from 1970, and see how we are doing.
Why? That is a terrible way to analyze any of this. I'm not reading through all 21 pages, but i'm hopeful they all point out the stupidity of this logic as well.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 4:36 pm to Zach
quote:
3. As teenagers in HS we always looked for MW jobs that involved more pleasant working conditions. My brother got a job scrubbing the inside of oil tanks. I got a job in radio. I won.
First summer job was cutting grass on a fence row with a sling blade, and baling hay. The next summer I painted the interiors of apartments in a housing project. No AC, but it was out of the sun, I didn’t think life could get any better.
Posted on 4/5/22 at 5:07 pm to EA6B
quote:
I didn’t think life could get any better.
We got married early.
MsNC dropped out of school (she had a full ride at Tulane) to support me, and worked as a doctor's receptionist for my first years of MedSchool.
Then she went back to school, got an LSU scholly, and her finance/accounting degrees.
Throughout we rigorously stuck to our personal budget where even an extra $10 per month was huge. As with you EA6B, we didn’t think life could get any better.
In terms of our happiness living $2$ in our 600sq ft apt, I'm not sure we were that far off. Would a millennial feel the same? Probably not. The millennial would be embarrassed about messaging any of the above would send to his/her friends.
This post was edited on 4/5/22 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:27 am to LSUFanHouston
i hate how these threads turn into minimum wage debates
i almost think the fight for 15 and whatnot is a psyop
i almost think the fight for 15 and whatnot is a psyop
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 8:36 am
Posted on 4/6/22 at 8:38 am to rebelrouser
The cost of living has gone up, whereas wages have not. This is a legitimate issue that has been caused by government.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 9:28 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Some of my best times in life, were when I was poor as isht. Not that I'd want to do it again, but, I'd be pizzed if someone denied me the experiences I had. At least now in retrospect.
Throughout we rigorously stuck to our personal budget where even an extra $10 per month was huge. As with you EA6B, we didn’t think life could get any better.
Hard days. But very satisfying in the end.
quote:One of the interesting things is we see today is many successful people do not consider themselves successful. (See my posts earlier in this thread).
In terms of our happiness living $2$ in our 600sq ft apt, I'm not sure we were that far off. Would a millennial feel the same? Probably not. The millennial would be embarrassed about messaging any of the above would send to his/her friends.
I think that's because they had such an easy time--they don't feel accomplished.
Some of the loudest whiners are college educated.
I'm sorry but if you've had the opportunity to get a college education and call yourself "oppressed" you're a clown. You had the chance to assemble all the tools you need to be successful.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 9:42 am to LSUFanHouston
That is about right.
First job out of college, (72) I started at $10,900.
First house was about $21,000.
First job out of college, (72) I started at $10,900.
First house was about $21,000.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 10:19 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Marxist-socialists refer to an expanding CEO-BurgerFipper wage gap as problematic. Capitalists refer to compensating the CEO of a rapidly expanding company at an increasingly lower-rate per location as SUCCESS!
two can play this...
300 of those CEO's get together to buy the majority of congressmen and women to do their bidding and screw everyone while they get richer and richer... In a perfect world people making millions would pay their employees more, but we don't live in that world, because people aren't perfect... I'm a capitalist and a republican. but a corporate oligarchy will trample rights every bit as fast as an overstepping government.. just look at covid mandates... what im talking about is evening out the power, more balance... last time i checked that was a conservative idea.. I suggest you read the book partnership economics... which is also faith based... 10 ultra rich people should not be steering the world as they see fit... Im talking about Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett etc... this is also one of the reasons why Teddy Roosevelt is prob one of the most underrated presidents.. He broke up Standard Oil... look how much wealth was created by breaking up that company.- You got Chevron, Exxon, Mobil... many companies were formed from that break up... We need more companies broken up... especially big tech.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 10:40 am to TigerFan55555
quote:Then the problem is congressmen and women, not "the rich". Great argument that government shouldn't have so much power.
300 of those CEO's get together to buy the majority of congressmen and women to do their bidding and screw everyone while they get richer and richer...
Posted on 4/6/22 at 10:42 am to TigerFan55555
again, why do these threads, and american discourse in general, always devolve into talk about minimum wage vs inflation and CEO pay? no one who matters gives a frick about minimum wage.
however, housing, education, healthcare, etc costs are extremely high relative to median wages and it's a valid problem that's not getting any better... and "move to nebraska" is not a macro solution.
however, housing, education, healthcare, etc costs are extremely high relative to median wages and it's a valid problem that's not getting any better... and "move to nebraska" is not a macro solution.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:02 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Then the problem is congressmen and women, not "the rich".
It takes a Million dollars to run for congress for the media and voters to believe youre a "Viable" candidate... how the hell do you think someone can raise a million dollars?.. the Rich get their people elected and keep them there after theyre elected... i said balance. Congress needs Campaign finance limits and term limits, one doesnt do a damn thing without the other.. Buisnesses need oversight, otherwise they can control whos elected and whos not.. They can also crush competition if they get too big... im all for the free market, until there is a massive unfair playing field. then it needs to be re-balanced.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:06 am to LSUFanHouston
Milk is a racket. In the 20's guys like Capone wanted in on it. The markup was ridiculous. In Louisiana you pay a premium for milk because of the subsidy provided by the state for local dairy farmers.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:10 am to TigerFan55555
quote:If government didn't have the power to determine their success, they'd not be interested. Do you think an billionaires are funding the Bunkie mayoral candidates? Of course not. No power.
It takes a Million dollars to run for congress for the media and voters to believe youre a "Viable" candidate... how the hell do you think someone can raise a million dollars?.. the Rich get their people elected and keep them there after theyre elected...
quote:Yea. Saying you're "for the free market" as long as no one is successful within it, means you aren't really for the free market. And as long as you empower government to destroy businesses-- you guarantee those businesses will do everything they can to protect their business. If government was trying to destroy your life, you'd do the same.
im all for the free market, until there is a massive unfair playing field
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 11:12 am
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:13 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
however, housing, education, healthcare, etc costs are extremely high relative to median wages and it's a valid problem that's not getting any better... and "move to nebraska" is not a macro solution.
because they are enamored with "minimum wage" isn't supposed to be a permanent job... which, I agree with, that's an entry level job for young people to learn how to work...
What I have a problem with is CEO's making millions and billions and the person making 60k a year doesn't get jack shite... not everyone can move up to CEOs and many times you gotta know someone to move up (or be a diversity hire now), ... I get tired of seeing it. then some idiot says "work harder" or move to another company" like, bitch i work 90 hour weeks working two jobs and own my own business, don't talk to me about hard work... not when i have to pay rising cost of everything else you just mentioned... healthcare/housing/etc.. you shouldn't have to work 90 hour weeks just to live... while some fricker walks into a CEO role and is instantly set for life... frick that... and Im a republican...
there is nothing wrong with setting up the tax code to incentivize companies to pay their workers more and pay less in taxes... we incentivize shite all the time... hell the democrats incentivize people to sit on their arse and make babies.... the wage gap is a damn problem...
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:17 am to TigerFan55555
quote:So why not become your own CEO? Start your company and make it successful if it's so easy and the CEO's role has no value. SHould be easy. What's stopping you?
What I have a problem with is CEO's making millions and billions and the person making 60k a year doesn't get jack shite... not everyone can move up to CEOs.. while some fricker walks into a CEO role and is instantly set for life
quote:You do realize that salary is 100% deductible as an expense, yes?
there is nothing wrong with setting up the tax code to incentivize companies to pay their workers more and pay less in taxes...
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 11:19 am
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:21 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
there is nothing wrong with setting up the tax code to incentivize companies to pay their workers more and pay less in taxes.
And when the cost of goods continue to rise you’ll be complaining that your new salary isn’t enough.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:23 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
If government didn't have the power to determine their success, they'd not be interested. Do you think an billionaires are funding the Bunkie mayoral candidates? Of course not. No power.
youre out of your mind, Soros gave a prosecuter (many) millions of dollars just to let criminals back out on the streets... millionaires fund candidates at all levels...
quote:
Yea. Saying you're "for the free market" as long as no one is successful within it,
so someone makes a million dollars profit and theyre "not successful"? whatever dude..
quote:
empower government to destroy businesses-
the government controls everything, it always has. ours just used to be elected... now, theyre installed...
Ive said nothing about controlling outcomes or picking winners and losers. Ive said balance out the power...
youre way of thinking JEff Bezos will run the world in 4 years... you have to have balance and the vision to see where someone may get too powerful and get in front of it... kinda like i said 15 years ago that the mergers of CBS/Viacom and ABC/Disney should have never been allowed. they were trying to consolidate power and they did. now we have a media controlled by the left.... You have nothing but woke CEOs now... look at how many CEOs resigned right before Covid...hundreds, thousands.. They all knew
you get hung up on your ideals and you don't even realize your enemy is using them against you... that's the difference between you and me... Pat Buchannan and Ross Perot were right 20+ years ago...
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:29 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:These threads are the personification of marxism - and nothing else.
i hate how these threads turn into minimum wage debates
CRT techique with pure totalitarian tyranny is the goal.
Full blown marxism supporters:
TigerOnTheMNountain
CarRamrod
Esquire
more to come
GreatLakesiger24
This post was edited on 4/6/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:35 am to LSUFanHouston
My age group is unhappy because they're losers brought up by losers, raising losers.
It's pretty simple.
It's pretty simple.
Posted on 4/6/22 at 11:41 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
CRT techique with pure totalitarian tyranny is the goal.
CRT isnt even the main problem in education but thats all republicans are focusing on... if you just fixed the system CRT and SEL would be gone in 5 minutes. REpublicans are so stupid they will pass a bill banning CRT and the Dems will just rename it and keep going. Fix the system Accountability/Finance/Curricula/diploma system and you never have to worry about that crap again...
God, now i know what Ross Perot and PAt Buchannan felt like watching a republicans support a globalist Bush and cheering him on only to know everything thats about to happen and feel powerless to do anything about... god i hate knowing everything...
Popular
Back to top



0







