Started By
Message

re: This is what vice presidents and generals in the United States Armed Forces look like!

Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8518 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:32 pm to
Damn Hank, that was solid. Keep hope alive.
Posted by ArmyAUguyofDallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Jun 2020
316 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:34 pm to
quote:


I've seen infantrymen who never left the TOC earn CIBs.


NO doubt, I can't remember which one but there were more awards/medals given out in either Just Cause (Panama) or Fury (Grenada)
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Of course no one has actually pointed out why they’re unqualified. Besides them being women.


Richardson is legit... Don't know the other lady, so no clue as to her qualifications...

Face it, these are political appointments like every other GO, especially 4-Stars at this level...

The only issue I have with it is the obvious photo-op for Biden and the fact that Kamala is being spotlighted when she sucked her way to the top and these other ladies probably earned their appointments...
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Firing missiles from a bird and being on the ground during a firefight is two VERY different forms of combat.
For clarity she flew assault, not attack back in the day. I work the medical side of the business. How it started really does not matter. You all come in the door bleeding, one way or another. Much respect to all of my brothers and sisters who put themselves in harms way.

Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27356 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Do any of you know ANYTHING about these two officers, other than their sex?


I’m, that’s not a gimme.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

For clarity she flew assault, not attack back in the day.
For more clarity still, she was landing a bird in a hot zone and dropping troops under fire, versus standing off and firing missiles from a distance.

Right?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

I’m, that’s not a gimme.
No, but it IS tacky.
Posted by TopFlightSecurity
Watertown, NY
Member since Dec 2018
1318 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:23 pm to
Politics aside, Gen. Richardson is an insanely competent and efficient leader. She isn't the one to label as a token promotion.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:23 pm to
Assault is UH-60. Land troops and equipment.

Attack is AH-64. Provide fire support from the air.

My terminology is not as precise because I am thirty years removed from being an infantry NCO. I am a medical service corps officer now.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68212 posts
Posted on 3/11/21 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Politics aside, Gen. Richardson is an insanely competent and efficient leader. She isn't the one to label as a token promotion
That sounds like good news.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram